s.VI Narratives, Ch.23 Criminal/Enemy
This chapter argues that the development of the international law of aggression has served to destabilize a dominant narrative based on the distinction between criminal and enemy. The criminal/enemy dyad has long been central to the western legal tradition. By attending to how rival traditions of legal theory have understood the dyad, the chapter illustrates how the criminalization of aggression marks one of the most distinctive developments in the history of international criminal law. This development, however, has proven problematic, as the criminalization of aggression has worked to deconstruct the traditional boundary between criminal and enemy, volatizing the very distinction between war and policing. The criminalization of aggression marks, then, something distinct from simply a growth of international law; it signals a fundamental shift that has left the relations between jus ad bellum and jus in bello in an uncertain state.