A cut-free sequent system for Grzegorczyk logic, with an application to the Gödel–McKinsey–Tarski embedding

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Dyckhoff ◽  
Sara Negri
Author(s):  
Paweł Płaczek

Bilinear Logic of Lambek [10] amounts to Noncommutative MALL of Abrusci [1]. Lambek [10] proves the cut–elimination theorem for a onesided (in fact, left-sided) sequent system for this logic. Here we prove an analogous result for the nonassociative version of this logic. Like Lambek [10], we consider a left-sided system, but the result also holds for its right-sided version, by a natural symmetry. The treatment of nonassociative sequent systems involves some subtleties, not appearing in associative logics. We also prove the PTIME complexity of the multiplicative fragment of NBL.


2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1/2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Buszkowski

In [5] we study Nonassociative Lambek Calculus (NL) augmented with De Morgan negation, satisfying the double negation and contraposition laws. This logic, introduced by de Grooté and Lamarche [10], is called Classical Non-Associative Lambek Calculus (CNL). Here we study a weaker logic InNL, i.e. NL with two involutive negations. We present a one-sided sequent system for InNL, admitting cut elimination. We also prove that InNL is PTIME.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Ilić ◽  
Branislav Boričić

Abstract In Ilić and Boričić (2014, Log. J. IGPL, 22, 673–695), the right-handed cut-free sequent calculus $GRW$ for the contraction-less relevant logic $RW$ is defined. In this paper, we show that the enlargement of the system $GRW$ with the structural rule of intensional contraction (WI) presents the sequent system for the principal relevant logic $R$ but the rule of cut cannot be eliminated in $GRW+$(WI).


Studia Logica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajeev Goré ◽  
Revantha Ramanayake

2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 673-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gabbay

AbstractWe build on an existing a term-sequent logic for the λ-calculus. We formulate a general sequent system that fully integrates αβη-reductions between untyped λ-terms into first order logic.We prove a cut-elimination result and then offer an application of cut-elimination by giving a notion of uniform proof for λ-terms. We suggest how this allows us to view the calculus of untyped αβ-reductions as a logic programming language (as well as a functional programming language, as it is traditionally seen).


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Borisavljević

Abstract In derivations of a sequent system, $\mathcal{L}\mathcal{J}$, and a natural deduction system, $\mathcal{N}\mathcal{J}$, the trails of formulae and the subformula property based on these trails will be defined. The derivations of $\mathcal{N}\mathcal{J}$ and $\mathcal{L}\mathcal{J}$ will be connected by the map $g$, and it will be proved the following: an $\mathcal{N}\mathcal{J}$-derivation is normal $\Longleftrightarrow $ it has the subformula property based on trails $\Longleftrightarrow $ its $g$-image in $\mathcal{L}\mathcal{J}$ is without maximum cuts $\Longrightarrow $ that $g$-image has the subformula property based on trails. In $\mathcal{L}\mathcal{J}$-derivations, another type of cuts, sub-cuts, will be introduced, and it will be proved the following: all cuts of an $\mathcal{L}\mathcal{J}$-derivation are sub-cuts $\Longleftrightarrow $ it has the subformula property based on trails.


Studia Logica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Golińska-Pilarek
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Tomasz Kowalski
Keyword(s):  

A sequent system is used to give alternative proofs of two well known properties of free lattices: Whitman’s condition and semidistributivity. It demonstrates usefulness of such proof systems outside logic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document