scholarly journals Coalition logic with individual, distributed and common knowledge1

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1041-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ågotnes ◽  
Natasha Alechina

Abstract Coalition logic is currently one of the most popular logics for multi-agent systems. While logics combining coalitional and epistemic operators have received considerable attention, completeness results for epistemic extensions of coalition logic have so far been missing. In this paper we provide several such results and proofs. We prove completeness for epistemic coalition logic with common knowledge, with distributed knowledge, and with both common and distributed knowledge, respectively. Furthermore, we completely characterise the complexity of the satisfiability problem for each of the three logics. We also study logics with interaction axioms connecting coalitional ability and knowledge.

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 659-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDRÉS CORDÓN FRANCO ◽  
HANS VAN DITMARSCH ◽  
ANGEL NEPOMUCENO

AbstractIn van Benthem (2008), van Benthem proposes a dynamic consequence relation defined as ${\psi _1}, \ldots ,{\psi _n}{ \models ^d}\phi \,{\rm{iff}}{ \models ^{pa}}[{\psi _1}] \ldots [{\psi _n}]\phi ,$ where the latter denotes consequence in public announcement logic, a dynamic epistemic logic. In this paper we investigate the structural properties of a conditional dynamic consequence relation $\models _{\rm{\Gamma }}^d$ extending van Benthem’s proposal. It takes into account a set of background conditions Γ, inspired by Makinson (2003) wherein Makinson calls this reasoning ‘modulo’ a set Γ. In the presence of common knowledge, conditional dynamic consequence is definable from (unconditional) dynamic consequence. An open question is whether dynamic consequence is compact. We further investigate a dynamic consequence relation for soft instead of hard announcements. Surprisingly, it shares many properties with (hard) dynamic consequence. Dynamic consequence relations provide a novel perspective on reasoning about protocols in multi-agent systems.


Author(s):  
Cheng-Gang Bian ◽  
◽  
Wen Cao ◽  
Gunnar Hartvigsen

ViSe2 l is an expert consulting system which employs software agents to manage distributed knowledge sources. These individual software agents solve users’ problems either by themselves or via cooperation. The efficiency of cooperation plays a serious role in Distributed Problem Solving (DPS) and Multi-Agent Systems (MAS). We have focused on the development of a twin-base approach for agents to model the capabilities of each other, and thus achieve efficient cooperation. The current version of the ViSe2 implementation is an experimental model of an agent-based expert system. Compared with other cooperation approaches in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI) area, the results received so far indicate that the ViSe2 agents serve their users in an efficient cooperation manner.


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingliang Chen ◽  
Kaile Su ◽  
Yong Hu ◽  
Guiwu Hu

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 115-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARTUR S. d'AVILA GARCEZ ◽  
LUÍS C. LAMB ◽  
KRYSIA BRODA ◽  
DOV M. GABBAY

Neural-Symbolic Systems concern the integration of the symbolic and connectionist paradigms of Artificial Intelligence. Distributed knowledge representation is traditionally seen under a symbolic perspective. In this paper, we show how neural networks can represent distributed symbolic knowledge, acting as multi-agent systems with learning capability (a key feature of neural networks). We apply the framework of Connectionist Modal Logics to well-known testbeds for distributed knowledge representation formalisms, namely the muddy children and the wise men puzzles. Finally, we sketch a full solution to these problems by extending our approach to deal with knowledge evolution over time.


Author(s):  
Jeremy Kong ◽  
Alessio Lomuscio

We define the logic LDLK, a formalism for specifying multi-agent systems. LDLK extends LDL with epistemic modalities, including common knowledge, for reasoning about the evolution of knowledge states of the agents in the system. We study the complexity of verifying a multi-agent system against LDLK specifications and show this to be in PSPACE. We give an algorithm for the practical verification of multi-agent systems specified in LDLK. We show that the model checking algorithm, based on alternating-automata and nFA, is amenable to symbolic implementation on OBDDs. We introduce MCMAS LDLK , an extension of the open-source model checker MCMAS, implementing the algorithm and discuss the experimental results obtained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document