Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Author(s):  
Jenna L. Walters

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neuropathic pain condition classified as type 1 and type 2. The two classifications are distinguished by the presence of documented nerve injury in CRPS type 2. The symptoms of CRPS, including cold, blue, and painful extremities, are believed to occur from vasoconstriction caused by sympathetic dysfunction. Treatment in CRPS focuses on targeting neuropathic and sympathetically maintained pain. Traditional antineuropathic pain medications include membrane stabilizers and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Corticosteroids and nonsteroidals target the inflammatory process present in the initial stages of CRPS. Bone resorption has been treated with calcium-modulating drugs. Interventional therapies include sympathetic blockade of the affected extremity, spinal cord stimulation, and intrathecal drug delivery. All these therapies have been implemented in an effort to facilitate functional restoration of the affected limb. Physical and occupational therapies have demonstrated some of the most significant improvements in pain, mobility, and function.

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars K. Lunden ◽  
Inge P. Kleggetveit ◽  
Ellen Jørum

Abstract Background and aims Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a serious and disabling chronic pain condition, usually occurring in a limb. There are two main types, CRPS 1 with no definite nerve lesion and CRPS 2 with an identified nerve lesion. CRPS 1 and 2 may occur following an injury (frequently following fractures), surgery or without known cause. An early diagnosis and start of adequate treatment is considered desirable for patients with CRPS. From the clinical experience of the principal investigator, it became apparent that CRPS often remained undiagnosed and that the clinical conditions of many patients seemed to be worsened following orthopedic surgery subsequent to the initial eliciting event. The aim of the present retrospective study of 55 patients, all diagnosed with either CRPS 1 or 2, was to evaluate the time from injury until diagnosis of CRPS and the effect on pain of orthopedic surgical intervention subsequent to the original injury/surgery. Methods Clinical symptoms with an emphasis on pain were assessed by going through the patients’ records and by information given during the investigation at Oslo University Hospital, where the patients also were examined clinically and with EMG/neurography. Alteration in pain was evaluated in 27 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery subsequent to the eliciting injury. Results Of a total of 55 patients, 28 women and 27 men (mean age 38.7 (SD 12.3), 38 patients were diagnosed with CRPS type 1, and 17 with CRPS type 2. Mean time before diagnosis was confirmed was 3.9 years (SD1.42, range 6 months-10 years). The eliciting injuries for both CRPS type 1 and type 2 were fractures, squeeze injuries, blunt injuries, stretch accidents and surgery. A total of 27 patients (14 men and 13 women) were operated from one to 12 times at a later stage (from 6 months to several years) following the initial injury or any primary operation because of fracture. A total of 22 patients reported a worsening of pain following secondary surgical events, while four patients found no alteration and one patient experienced an improvement of pain. None of the 22 patients reporting worsening, were diagnosed with CRPS prior to surgery, while retrospectively, a certain or probable diagnosis of CRPS had been present in 17/22 (77%) patients before their first post-injury surgical event. Conclusions and implications A mean time delay of 3.9 years before diagnosis of CRPS is unacceptable. A lack of attention to more subtle signs of autonomic dysfunction may be an important contributing factor for the missing CRPS diagnosis, in particular serious in patients reporting worsening of pain following subsequent orthopedic surgery. It is strongly recommended to consider the diagnosis of CRPS in all patients with a long-lasting pain condition. We emphasize that the present report is not meant as criticism to orthopedic surgical practice, but as a discussion for a hopefully increased awareness and understanding of this disabling pain condition.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (suppl_4) ◽  
pp. A222-A228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolfe Birch

Abstract Forty-eight cases of causalgia are described. The syndrome was caused by missile injury in 33 patients. There was a major arterial injury in 22 patients. Sympathetic block followed by sympathectomy abolished the pain in 11 of the first 14 patients in the series. Causalgia was cured by correcting the lesion of the nerve and of the adjacent axial artery in the subsequent 32 patients. The concept of complex regional pain syndrome Type 1 and Type 2 is challenged.


2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-3, 9-12
Author(s):  
Robert J. Barth ◽  
Tom W. Bohr

Abstract From the previous issue, this article continues a discussion of the potentially confusing aspects of the diagnostic formulation for complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1) proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), the relevance of these issues for a proposed future protocol, and recommendations for clinical practice. IASP is working to resolve the contradictions in its approach to CRPS-1 diagnosis, but it continues to include the following criterion: “[c]ontinuing pain, which is disproportionate to any inciting event.” This language only perpetuates existing issues with current definitions, specifically the overlap between the IASP criteria for CRPS-1 and somatoform disorders, overlap with the guidelines for malingering, and self-contradiction with respect to the suggestion of injury-relatedness. The authors propose to overcome the last of these by revising the criterion: “[c]omplaints of pain in the absence of any identifiable injury that could credibly account for the complaints.” Similarly, the overlap with somatoform disorders could be reworded: “The possibility of a somatoform disorder has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a somatoform scenario.” The overlap with malingering could be addressed in this manner: “The possibility of malingering has been thoroughly assessed, with the results of that assessment failing to produce any consistencies with a malingering scenario.” The article concludes with six recommendations, and a sidebar discusses rating impairment for CRPS-1 (with explicit instructions not to use the pain chapter for this purpose).


2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 213
Author(s):  
Tae Kyu Park ◽  
Kyung Ream Han ◽  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Young Joo Lee ◽  
Chan Kim

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Yasin Demir ◽  
Ümüt Güzelküçük ◽  
Serdar Kesikburun ◽  
Berke Aras ◽  
Mehmet Ali Taşkaynatan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131
Author(s):  
Davide Gatti ◽  
Angelo Fassio ◽  
Francesco Bertoldo

Pain Medicine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1388-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrid G. L. Fischer ◽  
Susan Collins ◽  
Sabine Boogaard ◽  
Stephan A. Loer ◽  
Wouter W. A. Zuurmond ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document