Headache

Author(s):  
Christopher H. Hawkes ◽  
Kapil D. Sethi ◽  
Thomas R. Swift

This chapter enumerates various features that are reassuring and do not point to serious disease. Several Red Flags are given that indicate the need for investigation. Clues for cluster headache, orthostatic headache, and several other headache syndromes are mentioned. Also listed are a few specific headaches that respond to indomethacin.

Author(s):  
Christopher H. Hawkes ◽  
Kapil D. Sethi ◽  
Thomas R. Swift

This chapter enumerates features that are reassuring and do not point to serious disease, such as carotid artery tenderness, slow evolution of symptoms as in hemisensory or hemiparetic migraine, sensory or motor symptoms on the same side as the headache, and age of symptom onset. Several Red Flags are given that indicate the need for investigation, such as first or worst headache, cough headache, morning headache, coital headache, thunderclap headache, continuous headache in an elderly person, medication overuse headache, and CADASIL syndrome. Clues for cluster headache, orthostatic headache, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and several other headache syndromes are mentioned. Also listed are a few specific headaches that respond to indomethacin.


2020 ◽  
pp. 4406-4414
Author(s):  
Carlo Ammendolia ◽  
Danielle Southerst

Over 70% of people in industrialized countries suffer from low back pain at some time, and it is one of the main reasons for visits to physicians. Risk factors include heavy physical work, smoking, stress, depression, and job dissatisfaction. In more than 90% of cases the exact anatomical source of back pain cannot be determined, and the preferred diagnostic label is ‘non-specific low back pain’. Investigation should be restricted to patients with red flags and clinical suspicion of serious disease, with magnetic resonance imaging the best imaging modality for the diagnosis of lumbar disorders. In the absence of red flags, patients with acute low back pain should receive non pharmacological care as first treatment option including reassurance, advise to remain active, massage and spinal manipulation followed by non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and muscle relaxants if necessary.


2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
John Edmeads

Cluster headache causes great misery because of the severity, frequency and repetitiveness of its attacks, and the fear (justified in a few sufferers) that the attacks will respond to nothing and will never cease. For most people with cluster headaches there is effective treatment, both for the acute attacks (subcutaneous sumatriptan, injected dihydroergotamine and oxygen inhalation) and for prophylaxis (verapamil, valproate, ergotamine, methysergide, lithium carbonate and corticosteroids). For the 10% of suffers who respond to no medications, or have to discontinue them because of serious adverse effects, surgical ablation of the trigeminal root or nervus intermedius is a last resort that helps only some. Correct diagnosis is an essential prelude to an appropriate treatment. Serious disease such as carotid dissection, and aneurysm may occasionally mimic cluster headache, but seldom perfectly enough to confuse a careful clinician. In terms of sorting out the diagnosis, the recently recognized relatives of cluster headache -- chronic and episodic paroxysmal hemicrania, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing syndrome -- are more problematic. These are important to recognize because they do not respond to 'cluster treatment', but the paroxysmal hemicranias respond to indomethacin, whereas the cluster headache does not. A more distant family member, hemicrania continua, is usually, but not always, responsive to indomethacin and sometimes bears a passing resemblance to cluster headache. An unrelated entity, hypnic headache, has confused a few clinicians who did not bear in mind that a detailed history is the key to headache diagnosis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18
Author(s):  
Andrea Bell ◽  
K. Todd Houston

To ensure optimal auditory development for the acquisition of spoken language, children with hearing loss require early diagnosis, effective ongoing audiological management, well fit and maintained hearing technology, and appropriate family-centered early intervention. When these elements are in place, children with hearing loss can achieve developmental and communicative outcomes that are comparable to their hearing peers. However, for these outcomes to occur, clinicians—early interventionists, speech-language pathologists, and pediatric audiologists—must participate in a dynamic process that requires careful monitoring of countless variables that could impact the child's skill acquisition. This paper addresses some of these variables or “red flags,” which often are indicators of both minor and major issues that clinicians may encounter when delivering services to young children with hearing loss and their families.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Kate Romanow
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document