headache diagnosis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

139
(FIVE YEARS 22)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefine Lund ◽  
Amalie Berring-Uldum ◽  
Merve Colak ◽  
Nanette Marinette Monique Debes

Abstract Background More than half of children and adolescents have experienced headache within the last 3 months. Several risk factors for headache have been identified, including obesity and lack of sleep. The association between screen time and headache in children and adolescents is sparsely investigated. The aim of this study was to assess this association and evaluate if it varied according to headache diagnosis. Method This cross-sectional study was performed at the tertiary pediatric outpatient clinic for headache at Herlev University Hospital. A total of 139 participants who answered a questionnaire on lifestyle factors and their daily living were included. Diagnoses of migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) were made according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3. Children with both migraine and TTH were allocated to a mixed headache group. We differentiated between total, leisure, and school-related screen time. Results The mean age was 13.20 ± 3.38 years and 53.2% were girls. Note that 25.2% were diagnosed with migraine without aura, 23.0% migraine with aura, 28.1% TTH, 15.8% mixed headache, and 7.9% had an unclassified headache diagnosis at the time of inclusion. There was no statistically significant difference in screen time across the five headache groups. An association between screen time and headache frequency was found in children with migraine with aura. Conclusion In this study, we investigated the association between screen time and headache in children and adolescents. More screen time was associated with more frequent headaches in children with migraine with aura. Future prospective studies are needed to determine the causality of this association.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Ruttledge ◽  
Gregor Broessner ◽  
Astrid Gendolla ◽  
Els Hollanders

Abstract Background: There is an unmet need for the correct diagnosis of primary headache disorders, such as migraine, in primary care. Misdiagnosis is associated with suboptimal management of patients, and it is now widely accepted internationally that better diagnostic support is needed for general practitioners (GPs). In this study, we describe the development of a short, patient-directed questionnaire and supporting documents that aim to help with the diagnosis of headache disorders in primary care. We have also prepared patient feedback material and collected preliminary input from patients, but the main aim of this report is to invite comment and debate on the use of the questionnaire in real-life clinical practice.Methods: This questionnaire was developed over 18 months using the clinical experience of the authors, current literature review and the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD), 3rd edition, for migraine, tension-type headache, cluster headache and medication-overuse headache. The questionnaire and two supporting documents will hopefully assist the GP to make a correct diagnosis. A patient survey was used to gather feedback from a small number of patients, and based on these comments, the questionnaire and the supporting documents were modified and updated.Results: Feedback gathering was attempted in Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Ireland and Spain, but was only possible in Austria due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions. From the 18 patients who participated, 17 responded about how easy or difficult the questionnaire was to complete, with 14/17 (82%) being able to complete the questionnaire easily on their own. Overall, the patients found the questionnaire averagely helpful in reminding them of and communicating their headache triggers, symptoms and behaviour changes; on a scale of 1–5, with 1 being very helpful and 5 being not helpful at all, the mean scores were 2.8 and 2.7 (n=18), respectively. Conclusions: This questionnaire and associated documents were developed with a view to helping GPs to make an accurate headache diagnosis quickly in primary care. Following feedback from patients, updates have been made, including changes to reduce the time it takes to complete the questionnaire. Next steps include wider validation and feedback from primary care physicians.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Viola Obermeier ◽  
Monika Murawski ◽  
Florian Heinen ◽  
Mirjam N. Landgraf ◽  
Andreas Straube ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Health care costs of migraine constitute a major issue in health economics. Several publications analyzed health care costs for adult migraine patients, based on questionnaires or secondary (health insurance) data. Although migraine often starts already in primary school age, data on migraine related costs in children is scarce. In this paper we aimed to assess the migraine-related health care costs in 6 to 11 year old children in Germany. Methods Using claims data of a large German health insurer (BARMER), overall annual health care costs of 6 to 11 year old children with a diagnosis of migraine in 2017 (n = 2597) were compared to a control group of 6 to 11 year old children without a headache diagnosis between 2013 and 2017 (n = 306,926). The association of migraine and costs was modeled by generalized linear regression (Gamma regression) with adjustment for sex, age and comorbidities. Results Children with migraine caused considerably higher annual per capita health care costs than children without a headache diagnosis (migraine group: € 1018, control group: € 618). Excess costs directly related to migraine amounted to € 115. The remaining excess costs were related to comorbidities, which were more frequent in the migraine group. Mental and behavioural disorders constituted the most expensive comorbidity, accounting for € 105 of the € 400 annual excess costs in the migraine group. Conclusion 6 to 11 year old children with a migraine diagnosis cause significant direct and comorbidity related excess costs in the German health care system.


2021 ◽  
pp. 44-50
Author(s):  
Ligia Barros Oliveira ◽  
Jessica Guimarães ◽  
Danilo Jorge da Silva ◽  
Mauro Eduardo Jurno

BackgroundHeadache is a common symptom that affects a significant portion of the general population. It constitutes a challenge for diagnosis in urgency and emergency care services, due to headache’s clinical variability and diverse possible etiologies, besides the limited time and resources of these facilities. Because of this insufficiency and the potential severity associated with the condition, headaches generate considerable expenditures to health systems, related to both diagnostic discrimination and treatment.ObjectiveEvaluating the diagnostic resources used on headache patients care, as well as its Public Health Relevanceand relation to cost in an Emergency and Urgency Care unit.MethodsCross-section study analyzing 450 medical records of patients with headache complaints in the time frame from January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Patients were categorized according to the type of headache (primary and secondary), specialized evaluation, complementary exams used in the diagnosis, hospital observation time, and the final expenditure in each patient’s care.ResultsThe total estimated expenditures related to headache care equaled US$90,855.60 (average US$201.90 per patient). 38.9% of cases corresponded to primary headaches and 31.1% to secondary headaches. 30% of cases could not be classified. The resources utilized for secondary headaches diagnosis differed significantly from those used in primary headache diagnosis. However, the final expenditures were similar to both groups.ConclusionThe socio-economic impact caused by headaches is unquestionable. It is a highly frequent symptom and both its etiological distinction and adequate treatment require solid evaluation. Due to the resources spent in its evaluation and monitoring, headaches can be considered a public health problem. Therefore, this study suggests that resources should be allocated in the health education and professional training for the proper conduction of these patients, so that they may benefit from an optimized treatment of theircondition without overwhelming the health system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 839
Author(s):  
Anne Thiele ◽  
Sebastian Strauß ◽  
Anselm Angermaier ◽  
Lara Klehr ◽  
Luise Bartsch ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Headache disorders are among the most disabling medical conditions but the supply with experienced providers is outpaced by the demand for service. It is unclear to what extent particularly patients in rural regions are affected by limited access to comprehensive care. Furthermore, it is unknown what role general practitioners (GPs) play in headache care. (2) Methods: First-time consultations to a specialised headache clinic at a tertiary care centre were asked to participate. Their socio-demographic background, general and headache-specific medical history, disability and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Additionally, 176 GPs in neighbouring districts were contacted regarding headache management. (3) Results: We assessed 162 patients with first-time consultations (age 46.1 ± 17.0 years, 78.1% female), who suffered from migraine (72%), tension type, cluster and secondary headaches (each 5–10%). About 50% of patients received a new headache-diagnosis and 60% had treatment inconsistent with national guidelines. QoL was significantly worse in all domains compared to the general population. About 75% of GPs see headache patients at least several times per week, and mostly treat them by themself. (4) Conclusions: More than every second headache patient was neither correctly diagnosed nor received guideline adherent treatment. Headache-related disability is inferior to what is expected from previous studies. Access to specialised health care is more limited in rural than in urban regions in Germany and GPs request more training.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Russo ◽  
Marcello Silvestro ◽  
Laura Vanore ◽  
Raffaella Capasso ◽  
Mattia Siciliano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since the pioneering reports of the so-called leonine face in cluster headache (CH) patients, cranial and facial features of these patients have been poorly investigated with conflicting results. We aimed to investigate whether abnormalities in craniometric measurements could characterize male CH patients and represent reliable and reproducible diagnostic biomarkers able to identify CH patients. Methods Brain CT images were recorded between 2018 and 2020 in 24 male patients with CH and in 24 matched healthy controls (HC). Then, craniometric measurements were obtained, and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves analyses were used to identify the craniometric abnormalities able to distinguish CH patients from HC. Results Logistic regression analyses showed that frontal bone height and facial width were able to discriminate, one independently from the other, CH patients from HC with an overall accuracy of 77%. The optimal cutoff score in detecting the probable presence of CH was 11.50 cm for frontal bone height and 13.30 cm for facial width. Discussion In the present study we found, for the first time by means of brain 3D computed tomography approach, abnormal craniometric measurements in CH patients when compared with HC. The absence of differences in smoke and alcohol intake suggests that the observed craniometric abnormalities may represent a specific feature of CH patients. Conclusion The craniometric evaluation by means of brain 3D computed tomography could represent a widespread, noninvasive, and accurate tool to support CH diagnosis to avoid frequent misdiagnosis or delay in the diagnostic process.


Author(s):  
Craig Moore ◽  
Stephney Whillier ◽  
Martha Funabashi ◽  
Diana De Carvalho ◽  
Jon Adams ◽  
...  

Objective To explore the self-perceived preparedness and clinical proficiency in headache diagnosis and management of Australian chiropractic students in senior years of study. Methods Australian chiropractic students in the 4th (n = 134) and 5th year (n = 122) of 2 chiropractic university programs were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional survey. Descriptive analyses were conducted for all variables. Post hoc analyses were performed using simple linear regression to evaluate the relationship between self-perceived preparedness and correctness of headache diagnosis and management scores. Results Australian chiropractic students in senior years demonstrated moderate overall levels of self-perceived preparedness and proficiency in their ability to diagnose and manage headache disorders. Final-year students had a slightly higher self-perceived preparedness and proficiency in headache diagnosis and management compared to those students in the 4th year of study. There was no relationship between self-perceived preparedness and correctness of headache diagnosis and management for either 4th- or 5th-year chiropractic students. Conclusion Our findings suggest that there may be gaps in graduate chiropractic student confidence and proficiency in headache diagnosis and management. These findings call for further research to explore graduate chiropractic student preparedness and proficiency in the diagnosis and management of headache disorders.


2021 ◽  
pp. 088307382098841
Author(s):  
Jacob Genizi ◽  
Vera Bugdnoskya ◽  
Amer Aboud ◽  
Idan Segal ◽  
Nurit Assaf ◽  
...  

Introduction: The International Headache Society criteria were written in order to help physicians establish a headache diagnosis. However, sometimes children with headache do not seem to fit any diagnosis. The purpose of our study was to assess the application of the criteria in a clinical setting. Methods: Medical records of children referred for primary headache to the pediatric neurology clinic at Bnai Zion Medical Center from 2008 to 2017 were assessed. Results: A total of 989 patients (range 6-18 years; 53% female) were assessed at our neurology clinic. Twenty-four percent (n = 241) were diagnosed with tension-type headache, 26% (n = 256) with migraine, and 4.5% (45) with mixed headache. In 41.5% (410), we were unable to reach a specific diagnosis. No differences in gender or age were found between the groups. Children in the migraine group used more analgesic treatments to stop the headache attacks compared with the tension-type headache group (50% vs 38%, P = .001). Patients diagnosed with tension-type headache reported having more emotional difficulties ( P = .001). No significant differences were found in headache characteristics (ie, location, sidedness, character), frequency, or intensity between the younger children (ages 6-11) and the adolescents (ages 12-18) within either the tension-type headache or migraine groups. Conclusions: Retrospective application of International Headache Society criteria in a large cohort of children with headaches failed to diagnose a specific type of headache in 41.5% of children. Migraine and tension-type headache were equally prevalent, and both constituted a major burden on our patients’ everyday lives. We found no major differences in frequency, intensity, and characteristics of pain between younger children and adolescents.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 251581632110299
Author(s):  
Heiko Pohl ◽  
Andreas R Gantenbein ◽  
Peter S Sandor ◽  
Jean Schoenen ◽  
Colette Andrée

Background: Cluster headache cannot be cured, and not all attacks can be aborted or prevented. Nevertheless, therapeutic guidelines focus solely on the attacks and ignore reverberations of the disorder on patients’ lives. However, it is likely that not only pain reduces patients’ quality of life (QoL). Objective: To investigate whether the interictal burden independently influence the QoL of subjects suffering from cluster headache. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we asked patients with a self-reported cluster headache diagnosis to answer a modified EUROLIGHT questionnaire that included the EURO-HIS QoL scale. We built a generalised linear model and included the QoL as the dependent variable. Independent variables comprised both the ictal and the interictal burden. Results: The data of 625 participants entered the analysis. Several aspects of the interictal burden independently reduced the QoL. Among them were fear of pain, self-concealment, and private life difficulties due to the disorder. Conclusion: Both the ictal and the interictal burden of cluster headache independently reduce patients’ QoL. We advocate adopting a more holistic approach to cluster headache management extending the focus towards the afflicted person and their QoL, which would generate novel therapeutic goals and strategies, complementary to treating and preventing cluster headache attacks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document