Commentary: “Save the Nerve”: Technical Nuances for Hearing Preservation and Restoration in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adesh Shrivastava ◽  
Suresh Nair
Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Haines ◽  
Samuel Levine ◽  
Scott Turner

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 749-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gautam U. Mehta ◽  
Gregory P. Lekovic

Although most widely known as the birthplace of neuro-otology, the House Clinic in Los Angeles has been the site of several major contributions to the field of neurosurgery. From the beginning of the formation of the Otologic Medical Group in 1958 (later renamed the House Ear Clinic), these contributions have been largely due to the innovative and collaborative work of neurosurgeon William E. Hitselberger, MD, and neuro-otologist William F. House, MD, DDS. Together they were responsible for the development and widespread adoption of the team approach to skull-base surgery. Specific neurosurgical advances accomplished at the House Clinic have included the first application of the operative microscope to neurosurgery, the application of middle fossa and translabyrinthine approaches for vestibular schwannoma, and the development of combined petrosal, retrolabyrinthine, and other alternative petrosal approaches and of hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. The auditory brainstem implant, invented at the House Clinic in 1979, was the first ever successful application of central nervous system neuromodulation for restoration of function. Technological innovations at the House Clinic have also advanced neurosurgery. These include the first video transmission of microsurgery, the first suction irrigator, the first debulking instrument for tumors, and the House-Urban retractor for middle fossa surgery.


1995 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 374-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Sanna ◽  
Sandeep Karmarkar ◽  
Mauro Landolfi

AbstractThis study reviews 57 papers dealing with the issue of hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery published in otolaryngologic and neurosurgical literature between theyears 1977 and 1994. The authors', in this review, have made an attempt to verify whether the claims of hearing preservation are real, whether there is a price to be paid in terms of morbidity and whether there are univocal criteria for reporting results. The review shows that there is a wide disarray in reporting hearing results and the claims of hearing preservation are often unreal and misleading. On retabulating the results of a few series according to the minimal prerequisites for normal hearing (PTA ≤3O dB and SDS ≥70 per cent) and according to other various commonly reported criteria, it became evident that rates of hearing preservation differeda lot depending upon criteria. While any measurable hearing could be preserved in many cases, only a few had normal hearing preserved.


Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5441-5447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Ho Han ◽  
Dong Gyu Kim ◽  
Hyun-Tai Chung ◽  
Sun Ha Paek ◽  
Chul-Kee Park ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. V8
Author(s):  
Julia Shawarba ◽  
Cand Med ◽  
Matthias Tomschik ◽  
Karl Roessler

Facial and cochlear nerve preservation in large vestibular schwannomas is a major challenge. Bimanual pincers or plate-knife dissection techniques have been described as crucial for nerve preservation. The authors demonstrate a recently applied diamond knife dissection technique to peel the nerves from the tumor capsule. This technique minimizes the nerve trauma significantly, and complete resection of a large vestibular schwannoma without any facial nerve palsy and hearing preservation is possible. The authors illustrate this technique during surgery of a 2.6-cm vestibular schwannoma in a 27-year-old male patient resulting in normal facial function and preserved hearing postoperatively. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2021.7.FOCVID21104


2018 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 563-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Akakpo ◽  
William J. Riggs ◽  
Michael S. Harris ◽  
Edward E Dodson

Objectives: To describe a case of inadvertent hearing preservation following a classical translabyrinthine resection of a vestibular schwannoma of the internal auditory canal in an otherwise healthy patient. Methods: Herein, we describe the case of an otherwise healthy patient who underwent resection of an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma via a translabyrinthine approach. Furthermore, as part of an ongoing study aimed at characterizing hearing changes due to intraoperative events, cochlear hair cell and nerve activity were monitored using electrocochleography throughout surgery. Unexpectedly, the patient maintained serviceable hearing following surgery. As a result, we are able to provide electrophysiologic evidence of cochlear hair cell activity at various stages of this surgery. Results: Hair cell responses across tested frequencies were detectable prior to and following completion of the translabyrinthine procedure. Neural integrity of the auditory division of cranial nerve VIII was maintained throughout. Lastly, postoperative audiometric testing supported the patient’s subjective assertion of serviceable hearing in the surgical ear. Conclusion: Our results suggest that some degree of hair cell and neural integrity can be maintained throughout the course of the translabyrinthine approach, and if preservation of the auditory division of cranial nerve VIII is feasible, a functional amount of hearing preservation is attainable.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kareem O. Tawfik ◽  
Thomas H. Alexander ◽  
Joe Saliba ◽  
Yin Ren ◽  
Bill Mastrodimos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document