Melody, Memory, and Engagement in Alzheimer’s Disease

2019 ◽  
pp. 67-87
Author(s):  
Ashley D. Vanstone ◽  
Lola L. Cuddy

What are the personal and clinical implications of preserved memory for music in dementia? In light of this question, a framework is proposed for integrating basic and clinical research findings and for case formulation and theory building in music-based interventions. Elaborating on the Comprehensive Process Model of Engagement, a proposal is made for music engagement as an inclusive concept that encompasses the variety of ways in which individuals involve themselves with musical stimuli. It is argued that instances of music engagement arise through the combined influence of person, stimulus, and environment attributes. Preserved memory for melodies is discussed as an attribute of the person with particular relevance to music engagement. This approach orients naturally toward considering individual differences and, as such, lends itself well to case-based research and clinical case formulation.

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie Solomon ◽  
David Hessl ◽  
Sufen Chiu ◽  
Emily Olsen ◽  
Robert L. Hendren

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolph F. Wagner

Summary: Clinical case formulation within the research program subjective theories is based on a constructivistic point of view. The relevance of the subjective constructions was first postulated by Kelly (1955) in his personal construct theory. In his model of “man the scientist” Kelly shows the core assumption of a parallelism between naive and scientific theories. Kelly's model was elaborated within the research program subjective theories (RPST). This article shows the clinical case formulation within the RPST with examples of patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis and from chronic back pain. The RPST proposes a two-phase model for the research process of communicative and explanatory validation. In the phase of communicative validation, we are asking whether patients hold subjective theories about their diseases. In the phase of explanatory validation, we are asking whether these theories influence their behavior during illness. The results of the phase of communicative validation reveal that these patients do indeed have differentiated theories about their illnesses and recognize the potential of these ideas to influence the course of their illness. In the phase of explanatory validation, it was also possible to test these subjective theories empirically: Patients view their illnesses realistically and reveal rationally guided coping behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document