Golden Gettier

Author(s):  
Fred Dretske

Gettier constructed his well-known examples by assuming two things: (1) that the justification needed to know is the kind one can have for a false proposition; and (2) justificational closure— that justification is transmitted through known implication. I think both assumptions are false. Although I have elsewhere disputed (2), I will set that topic aside here. In this chapter I will, instead, challenge (1) by showing that if you accept (2), or any reasonable approximation to (2), you cannot accept (1). The justification needed to know must be conclusive, the kind of justification one cannot have for a false proposition.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil Diesendruck

The tendency to essentialize social groups is universal, and arises early in development. This tendency is associated with negative intergroup attitudes and behaviors, and has thus encouraged the search for remedies for the emergence of essentialism. In this vein, great attention has been devoted to uncovering the cognitive foundations of essentialism. In this chapter, I suggest that attention should also be turned towards the motivational foundations of essentialism. I propose that considerations of power and group identity, but especially a “need to belong”, may encourage children’s essentialization of social groups. Namely, from a young age, children are keen to feel members of a group, and that their membership is secure and exclusive. Essentialism is the conceptual gadget that satisfies these feelings. And to the extent that groups are defined by what they do, this motivated essentialism also impels children to be adamant about the maintenance of unique group behaviors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document