Article 41 Monitoring of approved codes of conduct

Author(s):  
Irene Kamara

Article 24 (Responsibility of the controller) (see too recitals 74–77, 83); Article 35 (Data protection impact assessment) (see too recital 84); Article 40 (Codes of conduct); Article 46 (Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards) (see too recitals 108–109); Article 57 (Tasks); Article 58 (Powers); Article 64 (Opinion of the Board); Article 70 (Tasks of the Board); Article 83 (General conditions for imposing administrative fines) (see too recitals 150–151); Article 93 (Committee procedure).

Author(s):  
Christopher Docksey

Article 5 (Principles relating to processing of personal data) (see too recital 39); Article 25 (Data protection by design and by default) (see too recital 78); Article 30 (Records of processing activities) (see too recital 82); Article 32 (Security of processing) (see too recital 83); Article 35 (Data protection impact assessment) (see too recitals 84 and 89–93); Articles 37–39 (Data protection officer) (see too recital 97); Articles 40–41 (Codes of conduct) (see too recitals 98–99); Articles 42–43 (Certification) (see too recital 100); Article 47 (Binding corporate rules) (see also recitals 108 and 110); Article 83 (General conditions for imposing administrative fines) (see too recitals 148 and 150–151).


Author(s):  
Irene Kamara

Article 24 (Responsibility of the controller) (see too recitals 74–77 and 83); Article 35 (Data protection impact assessment) (see too recital 84); Article 41 (Monitoring of approved codes of conduct); Article 46 (Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards) (see too recitals 108–109); Article 57 (Tasks); Article 58 (Powers); Article 64 (Opinion of the Board); Article 70 (Tasks of the Board); Article 83 (General conditions for imposing administrative fines) (see too recitals 150–151); Article 93 (Committee procedure).


Author(s):  
Waltraut Kotschy

Article 13 (Information to be provided where personal data are collected from the data subject); Article 14 (Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject); Article 15 (Right of access by the data subject); Article 24 (Responsibility of the controller); Article 32 (Security of processing); Article 35 (Data protection impact assessment); Article 37 (Designation of a data protection officer); Article 49 (Derogations for specific situations concerning transborder data flows); Article 83 (General conditions for imposing administrative fines)


Author(s):  
Eleni Kosta

Article 24 (Responsibility of controller); Article 25 (Data protection by design and by default); Article 32 (Security of processing); Article 36 (Prior consultation) (see too recitals 94–95); Article 39 (Tasks of data protection officer); Article 40 (Codes of conduct); Article 63 (Consistency mechanism); Article 64 (Opinions of EDPB).


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Dimitra Georgiou ◽  
Costas Lambrinoudakis

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) harmonizes personal data protection laws across the European Union, affecting all sectors including the healthcare industry. For processing operations that pose a high risk for data subjects, a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is mandatory from May 2018. Taking into account the criticality of the process and the importance of its results, for the protection of the patients’ health data, as well as the complexity involved and the lack of past experience in applying such methodologies in healthcare environments, this paper presents the main steps of a DPIA study and provides guidelines on how to carry them out effectively. To this respect, the Privacy Impact Assessment, Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (PIA-CNIL) methodology has been employed, which is also compliant with the privacy impact assessment tasks described in ISO/IEC 29134:2017. The work presented in this paper focuses on the first two steps of the DPIA methodology and more specifically on the identification of the Purposes of Processing and of the data categories involved in each of them, as well as on the evaluation of the organization’s GDPR compliance level and of the gaps (Gap Analysis) that must be filled-in. The main contribution of this work is the identification of the main organizational and legal requirements that must be fulfilled by the health care organization. This research sets the legal grounds for data processing, according to the GDPR and is highly relevant to any processing of personal data, as it helps to structure the process, as well as be aware of data protection issues and the relevant legislation.


Author(s):  
Dimitri Van Landuyt ◽  
Laurens Sion ◽  
Pierre Dewitte ◽  
Wouter Joosen

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Bock ◽  
Christian Ricardo Kühne ◽  
Rainer Mühlhoff ◽  
Měto R. Ost ◽  
Jörg Pohle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document