Translating Tribal Values

Author(s):  
Theresa Pasqual

Tribal governments in the Southwest employ a number of individuals to help with the preservation of tribal values and places. In this chapter, Theresa Pasqual, former director of Acoma Pueblo’s Historic Preservation Office and an Acoma tribal member, talks about her professional pathway, how Acoma has worked with other tribes to protect traditional cultural properties (TCPs), the challenges that tribes face in implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and how tribal values can be incorporated into the preservation process. Based on her long experience, she emphasizes the importance of stewardship, listening, and collaboration—with the latter including collaboration between tribes as well as with archaeologists, anthropologists, and historians. She also provides insights into the process for the recent successful nomination of Mount Taylor to the New Mexico Register of Cultural Historic Properties, the largest such property currently on the register.

1982 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-13

C. R. McGimsey, III, director of the Arkansas Archeological Survey, traces the changes in archeology within the past ten years in the Autumn issue of Early Man. McGimsey relates the developments which led to the passage of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, two pieces of legislation which helped revolutionize the discipline. Archeology changed from a totally academic endeavor to one with significant segments involved in either research or administration, or some combination of any two or all thsee. Even private archeological consulting firms are found today. In addition, the decade saw the emergence of the concepts of public archeology and a conservation ethic.


1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Gail Thompson

Proposed construction and development projects that require Federal permits are subject to review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, which requires that the Federal decision-maker take into account the project's potential effects on cultural resources listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Over the years and especially after 1990 when the National Park Service released Bulletin 38, Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs), Section 106 review has increased the consideration of designating TCPs and consultation with the Indian tribal organizations that value them. Bulletin 38 defines TCPs as places that have been historically important in maintaining the cultural identify of a community.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document