scholarly journals Uncertainty Shocks as Second-Moment News Shocks

2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Berger ◽  
Ian Dew-Becker ◽  
Stefano Giglio

AbstractWe provide evidence on the relationship between aggregate uncertainty and the macroeconomy. Identifying uncertainty shocks using methods from the news shocks literature, the analysis finds that innovations in realized stock market volatility are robustly followed by contractions, while shocks to forward-looking uncertainty have no significant effect on the economy. Moreover, investors have historically paid large premia to hedge shocks to realized but not implied volatility. A model in which fundamental shocks are skewed left can match those facts. Aggregate volatility matters, but it is the realization of volatility, rather than uncertainty about the future, that has been associated with declines.

SAGE Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824401986417
Author(s):  
Imlak Shaikh

Given that political events have substantial effect on new economic policies and economic performance of the country, this article aims to examine the behavior of the investors’ sentiment in terms of implied volatility index trailed by the U.S. presidential elections. The study empirically tests whether the presidential elections in 2012/2016 do contain the important market inclusive information to explain the expected stock market volatility. The findings indicate that investors’ concern was distracted around the presidential elections window, albeit the market performed identically in both the presidential election years. The significant fall in the implied volatility level (post-election period) is the calm before the storm, just wait and watch. The positive estimate uncovers the fact that investor worries were higher before the election day. In particular, the significant estimate of the presidential election debate shows that investors do regard the minutes of the presidential election debates in their portfolio selection. At the two elections era, on the candidacy of both the parties, the empirical result speaks marginally contrasting outcomes and falsifies the presidential election cycle hypothesis of past 29 U.S. election years. Empirical estimates conclude that the presidential elections in 2012/2016 have a strong, significant relationship with investor’s sentiment and stock market performance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 07-14
Author(s):  
Muhammad Bilal Saeed ◽  
◽  
Arshad Hassan ◽  

This study is aimed to explore the relationship between country rating and volatility of Karachi Stock Exchange for the period 1999 to 2012. This study employs daily data of country ratings and stock market returns to investigate influence of rating on volatility of market. Univariate Asymmetric GARCH model is used to explore the relationship and results reveal that country rating has a significant role in explaining volatility in Karachi Stock Exchange.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document