Bradley, Dr John Richard, (born 28 March 1958), Consultant Physician and Nephrologist, since 1994, and Director of Research and Development, since 1999, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Fellow and Director of Studies in Medicine, Trinity Hall, Cambridge, since 2001

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S74-S74
Author(s):  
Arnaud G L’Huillier ◽  
Chiara Mardegan ◽  
Samuel Cordey ◽  
Fanny Luterbacher ◽  
Sebastien Papis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Fever without source (FWS) is defined as a fever in which an extensive history and clinical examination fail to identify a cause. Although the vast majority of children with FWS have a self-limited viral infection, up to 10–25% have a serious bacterial infection (SBI). Therefore, many children require invasive diagnostic tests, hospital admission, and empirical administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The aim of this study was to assess the respective role of Human enterovirus (HEV), human parechovirus (HPeV), adenovirus (ADV) and herpesvirus type 6 (HHV6) viremia in children <3 years old presenting with FWS. Methods Prospective monocentric diagnostic study. Between November 2015 to December 2017, children <3 year olds with FWS had, in addition to the standardized institutional work-up for FWS, plasma tested by real-time (reverse-transcription) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for ADV, HHV6, HEV, and HPeV. Specimens with cycle threshold values <40 were considered positive. Quantification was performed on positive specimens for HEV, ADV, and HHV6 specimens when volume permitted. Results One hundred thirty-five patients had plasma PCR for ADV, HHV6, HEV, and HPeV. Male:female ratio was 1.45:1 and median age was 2.4 months (interquartile range 1.3–9.7). Among those, 47/135 (34.8%) had at least 1 virus detected in the plasma. More specifically, HEV was detected in 19 patients (14.1%), HHV6 in 15 (11.1%), HPeV in 8 (5.9%), and ADV in 7 (5.2%). Co-infection with 2 viruses was detected in 2 patients (ADV/HEV and ADV/HPeV). No patient with positive plasma PCR had a positive blood or CSF culture. Two patients with positive plasma PCR fulfilled American Academy of Pediatrics criteria for urinary tract infection. The first was HEV+ in plasma and CSF, midstream urine was positive for leukocytes and grew E. coli 106 CFU/mL, whereas the second was HHV6+ in plasma and catheter urine was positive leukocytes/nitrites and grew P. mirabilis 105 CFU/mL. Conclusion This epidemiological study highlights the frequent detection of active enteroviral, adenoviral, and HHV6 infections in plasma of children with FWS. Virus–virus and virus–bacteria co-infections are rare. Further studies are needed to establish causality between FWS and viremia. Disclosures A. G. L’Huillier, Gertrude Von Meissner foundation: Investigator, Research grant. Ernst and Lucie Schmidheiny foundation: Investigator, Research grant. Research and Development Grant, Geneva University Hospitals: Investigator, Research grant. L. Kaiser, Swiss National Funds: Investigator, Research grant. A. Galetto-Lacour, Gertrude Von Meissner foundation: Investigator, Research grant. Ernst and Lucie Schmidheiny foundation: Investigator, Research grant. Research and Development Grant, Geneva University Hospitals: Investigator, Research grant.


2021 ◽  
pp. postgradmedj-2021-141234
Author(s):  
Tagore Nakornchai ◽  
Elena Conci ◽  
Anke Hensiek ◽  
J William L Brown

BackgroundTelephone consultations are already employed in specific neurological settings. At Cambridge University Hospitals, the COVID-19 pandemic initially prompted almost all face-to-face appointments to be delivered by telephone, providing a uniquely unselected population to assess.ObjectivesWe explored patient and clinician experience of telephone consultations; and whether telephone consultations might be preferable for preidentifiable subgroups of patients after the pandemic.MethodsClinicians delivering neurological consultations converted to telephone between April and July 2020 were invited to complete a questionnaire following each consult (430 respondents) and the corresponding patients were subsequently surveyed (290 respondents). The questionnaires assessed clinician and patient goal achievement (and the reasons for any dissatisfaction). Clinicians also described consultation duration (in comparison to face to face) while patients detailed comparative convenience and preference.ResultsThe majority of clinicians (335/430, 78%) and patients (227/290, 78%) achieved their consultation goals by telephone, particularly during follow-up consultations (clinicians 272/329, 83%, patients 176/216, 81%) and in some disease subgroups (eg, seizures/epilepsy (clinicians 114/122 (93%), patients 71/81 (88%)). 95% of telephone consultations were estimated to take the same or less time than an equivalent face-to-face consultation. Most patients found telephone consultations convenient (69%) with 149/211 (71%) indicating they would like telephone or video consultations to play some role in their future follow-up.ConclusionTelephone consultations appear effective, convenient and popular in prespecified subgroups of neurological outpatients. Further work comparing telephone, video and face-to-face consultations across multiple centres is now needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document