scholarly journals Inheritance of Complete Resistance to Pearl Millet Downy Mildew

Plant Disease ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 791-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Singh ◽  
B. S. Talukdar

Inheritance of downy mildew (Sclerospora graminicola) resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) was studied in a cross involving DMRP (downy mildew resistant Pennisetum) 292 and DMSP (downy mildew susceptible Pennisetum) 23. DMRP 292, derived from IP 18292, and DMSP 23, derived from Tift 23DB, were made homozygous for downy mildew resistance-susceptibility by three generations of single plant selection followinginoculations with homogenized sporangial population of S. graminicola from the ICRISAT Asia Center. Potted seedlings of parental lines, F1, F2, and BC progenies were evaluated for their reactions to downy mildew following inoculation. The results show that complete resistance to downy mildew in DMRP 292 is controlled by a single dominant gene. Because of the simple mode of inheritance, resistance utilization from DMRP 292 is simple and straightforward. We designate this gene as Rsg1.

Plant Disease ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 1136-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandramani Raj ◽  
Rajan Sharma ◽  
B. Pushpavathi ◽  
S. K. Gupta ◽  
K. Radhika

Pearl millet downy mildew (DM), caused by Sclerospora graminicola, is of serious economic concern to pearl millet farmers in the major crop-growing areas of the world. To study the inheritance and allelic relationship among genes governing resistance to this disease, three DM-resistant pearl millet lines (834B, IP 18294-P1, and IP 18298-P1) and one susceptible line (81B) were selected on the basis of disease reaction under greenhouse conditions against two isolates of S. graminicola (Sg 526-1 and Sg 542-1). Three resistant parents were crossed with the susceptible parent to generate F1, F2, and backcross BC1P1 (susceptible parent × F1) and BC1P2 (resistant parent × F1) generations for inheritance study. To carry out a test for allelism, the three resistant parents were crossed with each other to generate F1 and F2 generations. The different generations of these crosses were screened for disease reaction against two isolates (Sg 526-1 and Sg 542-1) by artificial inoculation under greenhouse conditions. The segregation pattern of resistance in the F2 and corresponding backcross generations revealed that resistance to DM is controlled by a single dominant gene in 834B and IP 18294-P1 and by two dominant genes in IP 18298-P1. A test for allelism inferred that a single dominant gene for resistance in 834B is nonallelic to that which governs resistance in IP 18294-1, whereas one of the two dominant genes for DM resistance in IP 18298-P1 against the test isolates is allelic to the gene for DM resistance in 834B and a second gene is allelic to the resistance gene present in IP 18294-P1.


Plant Disease ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Thakur ◽  
K. N. Rai ◽  
V. P. Rao ◽  
A. S. Rao

Single-cross F1 hybrid cultivars based on cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterility (CMS) system have contributed significantly to increasing productivity of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Genetic resistance to downy mildew (Sclerospora graminicola) in parental lines is critical for successful commercial cultivation of a hybrid cultivar. In this study, 46 genetically diverse male-sterile lines (A-lines), including 42 test A-lines, four control A-lines, a commercial hybrid, and a highly susceptible line, were evaluated in disease nurseries at four diverse locations in India and compared with pathotype isolates from the same locations under greenhouse environments. Variability in downy mildew incidence (0 to 100%) due to genetic differences among lines, among pathotypes, and that due to line × pathotype interaction were all highly significant (P < 0.001). In the field experiment, eight of the 42 test A-lines, including 841A (control), that recorded ≤10% disease incidence, were identified as resistant compared with 84 to 100% incidence on the control susceptible line 7042S. Resistance in eight of these test A-lines (863A, ICMA 88004, -94333, -98222, -98111, -92777, and -96666) and 841A was confirmed against the four pathotypes in greenhouse experiments. Cluster analysis of downy mildew incidence data from field and greenhouse experiments, using the Euclidian distance, classified the 48 lines into four distinct groups with the above eight A-lines in the resistant group. These resistant A-lines would be useful in the development of F1 hybrids with stable resistance to diverse pathotypes of downy mildew in India.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 18-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Chandra Nayaka ◽  
H. Shekar Shetty ◽  
C.Tara Satyavathi ◽  
Rattan S. Yadav ◽  
P.B.Kavi Kishor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-113
Author(s):  
Sapna Jaiswal ◽  
Rajni S. Sasode ◽  
R.K. Pandya ◽  
Pramod Kumar Gupta

Author(s):  
S. M. Francis

Abstract A description is provided for Sclerospora graminicola. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: The two hosts on which this pathogen causes diseases of major economic importance are Pennisetum typhoides[Pennisetum glaucum] (syn. P. americanum) and Setaria italica. Also recorded on Echinochloa crusgalli, E. crusgalli var. fumentacea, Eleusine indica, Panicum miliaceum, Pennisetum leonis, Saccharum of ficinarum (by inoculation only), Setaria lutescens, S. magna, S. verticillata, S. viridis and Zea mexicana. The disease is very rare on Zea mays with only two confirmed reports, Melhus & Bliss (1928) in the USA and Kenneth (1966) in Israel. DISEASE: Graminicola downy mildew; green ear of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides[Pennisetum glaucum]). A biotrophic plant pathogen which invades and colonizes the growing points of young graminaceous plants causing systemic disease. The first leaf to show symptoms is yellowed in the basal portion with a distinct margin between the basal colonized portion and the non colonized distal portion. Leaves formed later show increasing amounts of disease until the entire leaf shows symptoms. Under suitable conditions sporangia form in great profusion on the under surface of the diseased leaf (and, when conditions are favourable, also on the upper surface) forming a conspicuous and characteristic white 'down'. Occasionally discrete local lesions have been observed on otherwise healthy leaves in highly susceptible cultivars in W. Africa. The most distinctive appearance of the disease on pearl millet is, however, the transformation of the inflorescences to vegetative structures with various leaf-like protrusions which vary greatly in size and number from very few on an almost normal inflorescence to complete replacement of the inflorescence by small leafy shoots. As diseased organs mature they become necrotic and often contain oospores within the tissue. In pearl millet the leaves containing oospores do not shred. The areas containing oospores are a deep chocolate brown and usually appear as long stripes down the leaf. On Setaria the symptoms are similar to those observed on pearl millet except that shredding of the leaf tissue containing oospores occurs. In the phase of the disease described above the height of the infected plants differs little from that of healthy plants. Another and less frequent reaction is that the diseased plants are severely stunted, show a yellow mottle, with non-infected parts becoming a much darker green than in healthy plants; few sporangia are produced and no green ears for the plants generally do not head. This reaction is a characteristic response of certain host genotypes. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: CMI Map 431, ed. 2, 1979. Note that the pearl millet pathotype has not been reported from the Americas. TRANSMISSION: Initial infection is by oospores which may remain viable for up to 10 years (Nene & Singh, 1976). Later infection comes from sporangia developing on early diseased leaves and spread by wind and rain to newly developed tillers which are produced throughout the growth of the plant (Singh & Williams, 1980). Seed transmission occurs from oospores carried with, and on, seed and there are conflicting reports of transmission from mycelium carried within seed (Williams, 1980).


Crop Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios N. Vlachostergios ◽  
Anastasios S. Lithourgidis ◽  
Demetrios G. Roupakias

2002 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Yano ◽  
Ryo Ohsawa ◽  
Katsuei Yonezawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document