scholarly journals FURTHER STUDIES ON FACTORS INFLUENCING LIVER INJURY AND LIVER REPAIR

1950 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. S. RAVDIN ◽  
HARRY M. VARS
2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dafna Groeneveld ◽  
Holly Cline-Fedewa ◽  
Kevin S. Baker ◽  
Kurt J. Williams ◽  
Robert A. Roth ◽  
...  

HemaSphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
D. Groeneveld ◽  
H. Cline-Fedewa ◽  
K. Baker ◽  
K.J. Williams ◽  
R.A. Roth ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 096368972095022
Author(s):  
Alexander Hodge ◽  
Neil Andrewartha ◽  
Dinushka Lourensz ◽  
Robyn Strauss ◽  
Jeanne Correia ◽  
...  

Human amnion epithelial cells (hAECs) exert potent antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects when transplanted into preclinical models of tissue fibrosis. These effects are mediated in part via the secretion of soluble factors by hAECs which modulate signaling pathways and affect cell types involved in inflammation and fibrosis. Based on these reports, we hypothesized that these soluble factors may also support liver regeneration during chronic liver injury. To test this, we characterized the effect of both hAECs and hAEC-conditioned medium (CM) on liver repair in a mouse model of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced fibrosis. Liver repair was assessed by liver fibrosis, hepatocyte proliferation, and the liver progenitor cell (LPC) response. We found that the administration of hAECs or hAEC-CM reduced liver injury and fibrosis, sustained hepatocyte proliferation, and reduced LPC numbers during chronic liver injury. Additionally, we undertook in vitro studies to document both the cell–cell and paracrine-mediated effects of hAECs on LPCs by investigating the effects of co-culturing the LPCs and hAECs and hAEC-CM on LPCs. We found little change in LPCs co-cultured with hAECs. In contrast, hAEC-CM enhances LPC proliferation and differentiation. These findings suggest that paracrine factors secreted by hAECs enhance liver repair by reducing fibrosis while promoting regeneration during chronic liver injury.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
San-Qiang Li ◽  
Dong-Mei Wang ◽  
You-Ju Shu ◽  
Xue-Dong Wan ◽  
Zheng-Shun Xu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumisato Otaka ◽  
Yoshiya Ito ◽  
Shuji Nakamoto ◽  
Nobuyuki Nishizawa ◽  
Tetsuya Hyodo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yoshiya Ito ◽  
Fumisato Otaka ◽  
Takuya Goto ◽  
Kanako Hosono ◽  
Ko Hatanako ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 1984 (19) ◽  
pp. 22-24
Author(s):  
K. TERAO ◽  
N. MOROOKA ◽  
E. ITO ◽  
T. TATSUNO

2013 ◽  
Vol 305 (12) ◽  
pp. G881-G890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanhua Xie ◽  
Anna Mae Diehl

The outcome of liver injury is determined by the success of repair. Liver repair involves replacement of damaged liver tissue with healthy liver epithelial cells (including both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes) and reconstruction of normal liver structure and function. Current dogma posits that replication of surviving mature hepatocytes and cholangiocytes drives the regeneration of liver epithelium after injury, whereas failure of liver repair commonly leads to fibrosis, a scarring condition in which hepatic stellate cells, the main liver-resident mesenchymal cells, play the major role. The present review discusses other mechanisms that might be responsible for the regeneration of new liver epithelial cells and outgrowth of matrix-producing mesenchymal cells during hepatic injury. This theory proposes that, during liver injury, some epithelial cells undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), acquire myofibroblastic phenotypes/features, and contribute to fibrogenesis, whereas certain mesenchymal cells (namely hepatic stellate cells and stellate cell-derived myofibroblasts) undergo mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET), revert to epithelial cells, and ultimately differentiate into either hepatocytes or cholangiocytes. Although this theory is highly controversial, it suggests that the balance between EMT and MET modulates the outcome of liver injury. This review summarizes recent advances that support or refute the concept that certain types of liver cells are capable of phenotype transition (i.e., EMT and MET) during both culture conditions and chronic liver injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document