scholarly journals Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Prelingual Deafness. Part I. Clinical Results

2004 ◽  
Vol 114 (9) ◽  
pp. 1536-1540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su Wooi Teoh ◽  
David B. Pisoni ◽  
Richard T. Miyamoto
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 418-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tova Most ◽  
Hadas Shrem ◽  
Ilana Duvdevani

1993 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 647-651
Author(s):  
Juichi Ito ◽  
Junji Sakakihara ◽  
Akira Takagi ◽  
Michio Kawano

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 4270-4276
Author(s):  
Yubo Ma ◽  
Xianfeng Bai ◽  
Fei Qi

Objective. The purpose of the study was to investigate the application effect of unilateral cochlear implantation combined with contralateral hearing aids on the hearing and speech rehabilitation in prelingual deafness children. Methods. In this study, a total of 78 children with severe or extremely severe sensorineural prelingual deafness admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were selected and divided into control group (n=39) and experimental group (n=39), according to the random number table. Among them, the children patients in the control group received dominant training after unilateral cochlear implantation, while the children patients in the experimental group received cochlear implantation combined with contralateral hearing aids; after that, the hearing and speech rehabilitation outcomes of the prelingual deafness children in both groups were compared and analyzed. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in the auditory thresholds of the children patients undergoing cochlear implantation between the two groups, while the auditory thresholds of contralateral ears of the children patients in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The recognition rates of the initials, finals, tones and disyllables of the children patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the CPA and SIR scores of the children patients in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Conclusions. Unilateral cochlear implantation combined with contralateral hearing aids can promote the hearing and speech rehabilitation in prelingual deafness children, with better clinical effect than the single unilateral cochlear implantation, and cochlear implantation have no interference in the work of contralateral hearing aids; therefore, this joint treatment method is worthy of wide application and promotion.


2003 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Am Mylanus ◽  
Paul Van Den Broek

2009 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
>Wolfgang Gstoettner ◽  
Silke Helbig ◽  
Claudia Settevendemie ◽  
Uwe Baumann ◽  
Jens Wagenblast ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
EFN Di Martino ◽  
H Jakob von ◽  
R Hinder ◽  
A Chatzakos

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 233121652110021
Author(s):  
Monika Matusiak ◽  
Dominika OzieRbło ◽  
Anita Obrycka ◽  
Monika Ołdak ◽  
Leszek Kaczmarek ◽  
...  

Genetic biomarkers of neuroplasticity in deaf children treated with cochlear implantation (CI) might facilitate their clinical management, especially giving them better chances of developing proficient spoken language. We investigated whether carrying certain variants of the genes encoding matrix metalloproteinase MMP9 and neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF), involved in synaptic plasticity, can be taken as prognostic markers of how well auditory skills might be acquired. Association analysis of functional MMP9 rs3918242 and BDNF rs6265 variants and the child’s auditory development measured at CI activation and 1, 5, 9, 14, and 24 months post CI activation with LittlEARS Questionnaire (LEAQ) was conducted in a group of 100 children diagnosed with DFNB1-related deafness, unilaterally implanted before the age of 2 years. Statistical analysis in the subgroup implanted after 1 year of life ( n = 53) showed significant association between MMP9 rs3918242 and LEAQ scores at 1 month ( p = .01), at 5 months ( p = .01), at 9 months ( p = .01), and at 24 months ( p = .01) after CI activation. No significant associations in the subgroup implanted before 1 year of life were observed. No significant associations between the BDNF rs6265 and LEAQ score were found. Multiple regression analysis ( R2 = .73) in the subgroup implanted after 1 year of life revealed that MMP9 rs3918242 was a significant predictor of treatment outcome. In conclusion, C/C rs3918242 MMP9 predisposes their deaf carriers to better CI outcomes, especially when implanted after the first birthday, than carriers of C/T rs3918242 MMP9.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document