Vascular Malformations Presenting as Spinal Cord Neoplasms

Neurosurgery ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 194???198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Montine ◽  
J. Conor O??Keane ◽  
Thomas A. Eskin ◽  
Felice Giangaspero ◽  
Linda Gray ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Montine ◽  
Conor J. OʼKeane ◽  
Thomas A. Eskin ◽  
Felice Giangaspero ◽  
Linda Gray ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 3147-3152
Author(s):  
Helen J. Zhang ◽  
Nicole Silva ◽  
Elena Solli ◽  
Amanda C. Ayala ◽  
Luke Tomycz ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-105
Author(s):  
P. Tabrizi ◽  
R.P. Spetzler

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A Sansur ◽  
Nader Pouratian ◽  
Aaron S Dumont ◽  
David Schiff ◽  
Christopher I Shaffrey ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Pascal Jabbour ◽  
James Harrop ◽  
Mario Zanaty

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 604-612
Author(s):  
Philippe Gailloud

Book chapters and journal articles dealing with spinal cord vascular malformations often reference Otto Hebold and Julius Gaupp, but frequently misrepresent the observations published by the two German authors in the late 19th century. The purpose of this paper is to provide a better appreciation of these important contributions based on abridged translations of original documents set in their historical context, notably regarding the landmark works of Brasch, Raymond and Cestan, and Lindenmann. It is concluded that Gaupp offered the first reliable description of a perimedullary arteriovenous fistula while the lesion reported by Hebold was not a spinal vascular malformation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. E1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward H. Oldfield

From the earliest observations of spinal vascular malformations, successful management has been challenging. Initially the challenges were diagnosing, understanding, and treating these lesions. They were originally considered all to be the same, or at least to be a single general type, of disease. With the introduction of selective spinal arteriography in the 1960s and more recently with the introduction and widespread use of MR imaging, the initial challenge of diagnosing spinal vascular malformations was overcome, and significant progress has been made in understanding their anatomy as well as the pathophysiology that underlies the myelopathy commonly associated with them. The anatomical features defined by selective arteriography and the observations permitted with the operating microscope ultimately led to distinctions between the major categories of the vascular lesions affecting the spinal cord; these distinctions were based on the lesions' anatomy, epidemiology, and the mechanism of spinal cord injury.


1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Matsumaru ◽  
S. Pongpech ◽  
J. Laothamas ◽  
H. Alvarez ◽  
G. Rodesch ◽  
...  

We describe 19 (16.0%) multiple vascular malformations (AVMs) in 119 spinal cord arteriovenous malformations (SCAVMs). The associated lesions were eight vertebral vascular malformations, two cutaneous, four limbs, four radicular AVMs, three bifocal SCAVMs; one patient had a bifocal cord lesion associated with vertebral and limb localisations. Various syndromic associations were seen: nine Cobb, two Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber, one Parkes Weber. An additional subgroup of unclassified associations is constituted by seven cases with bifocal intradural uni or multimetamerk lesions. In our SCAVMs series, the incidence of multiple vascular lesions is high, in particular multifocal intradural malformations. Metameric distribution is the most frequent type of multiplicity. Identification of the myelomeric level involved in SCAVM allows segmental link between various lesions of mesodermal or neural crest origin to be discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document