Spinal Cord Mapping as an Adjunct for Resection of Intramedullary Tumors: Surgical Technique with Case Illustrations

Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1199-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa ◽  
Mittul Gulati ◽  
Russell Lyon ◽  
Nalin Gupta ◽  
Charles Yingling
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Electromyographic Activity ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Tracts ◽  
Stimulation Of

Abstract OBJECTIVE Resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors may result in transient or permanent neurological deficits. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials are commonly used to limit complications. We used both antidromically elicited SSEPs for planning the myelotomy site and direct mapping of spinal cord tracts during tumor resection to reduce the risk of neurological deficits and increase the extent of tumor resection. METHODS In two patients, 3 and 12 years of age, with tumors of the thoracic and cervical spinal cord, respectively, antidromically elicited SSEPs were evoked by stimulation of the dorsal columns and were recorded with subdermal electrodes placed at the medial malleoli bilaterally. Intramedullary spinal cord mapping was performed by stimulating the resection cavity with a handheld Ojemann stimulator (Radionics, Burlington, MA). In addition to visual observation, subdermal needle electrodes inserted into the abductor pollicis brevis-flexor digiti minimi manus, tibialis anterior-gastrocnemius, and abductor halluces-abductor digiti minimi pedis muscles bilaterally recorded responses that identified motor pathways. RESULTS The midline of the spinal cord was anatomically identified by visualizing branches of the dorsal medullary vein penetrating the median sulcus. Antidromic responses were obtained by stimulation at 1-mm intervals on either side of the midline, and the region where no response was elicited was selected for the myelotomy. The anatomic and electrical midlines did not precisely overlap. Stimulation of abnormal tissue within the tumor did not elicit electromyographic activity. Approaching the periphery of the tumor, stimulation at 1 mA elicited an electromyographic response before normal spinal cord was visualized. Restimulation at lower currents by use of 0.25-mA increments identified the descending motor tracts adjacent to the tumor. After tumor resection, the tracts were restimulated to confirm functional integrity. Both patients were discharged within 2 weeks of surgery with minimal neurological deficits. CONCLUSION Antidromically elicited SSEPs were important in determining the midline of a distorted cord for placement of the myelotomy incision. Mapping spinal cord motor tracts with direct spinal cord stimulation and electromyographic recording facilitated the extent of surgical resection.

Dorsal Column Mapping via Phase Reversal Method

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Nair ◽  
Vishakhadatta M. Kumaraswamy ◽  
Diana Braver ◽  
Ronan D. Kilbride ◽  
Lawrence F. Borges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Reliable Technique ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Phase Reversal

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Safe resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors can be challenging, because they often alter the cord anatomy. Identification of neurophysiologically viable dorsal columns (DCs) and of neurophysiologically inert tissue, eg, median raphe (MR), as a safe incision site is crucial for avoiding postoperative neurological deficits. We present our experience with and improvements made to our previously described technique of DC mapping, successfully applied in a series of 12 cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new, safe, and reliable technique for intraoperative DC mapping. METHODS: The right and left DCs were stimulated by using a bipolar electric stimulator and the triggered somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the scalp. Phase reversal and amplitude changes of somatosensory evoked potentials were used to neurophysiologically identify the laterality of DCs, the inert MR, as well as other safe incision sites. RESULTS: The MR location was neurophysiologically confirmed in all patients in whom this structure was first visually identified as well as in those in whom it was not, with 1 exception. DCs were identified in all patients, regardless of whether they could be visually identified. In 3 cases, negative mapping with the use of this method enabled the surgeon to reliably identify additional inert tissue for incision. None of the patients had postoperative worsening of the DC function. CONCLUSION: Our revised technique is safe and reliable, and it can be easily incorporated into routine intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection. It provides crucial information to the neurosurgeon to prevent postoperative neurological deficits.

The Initial Use of Free-running Electromyography to Detect Early Motor Tract Injury during Resection of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Lesions

2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (suppl_4) ◽  
pp. ONS-299-ONS-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley A. Skinner ◽  
Mahmoud Nagib ◽  
Thomas A. Bergman ◽  
Robert E. Maxwell ◽  
Gaspar Msangi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Spinal Cord Lesions ◽  
Blood Pressure Elevation ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Free Running

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The resection of intramedullary spinal cord lesions (ISCLs) can be complicated by neurological deficits. Neuromonitoring has been used to reduce intraoperative risk. We have used somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and muscle-derived transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (myogenic TCE-MEPs) to monitor ISCL removal. We report our retrospective experience with the addition of free-running electromyography (EMG). METHODS: Thirteen patients underwent 14 monitored ISCL excisions. Anesthesia was maintained with minimal inhalant to reduce motoneuron suppression and enhance the myogenic TCE-MEPs. Free-running EMG was examined in the four limbs for evidence of abnormal bursts, prolonged tonic discharge, or sudden electrical silence. Warning of an electromyographic abnormality or myogenic TCE-MEP loss prompted interventions, including blood pressure elevation, a pause in surgery, a wake-up test, or termination of surgery. Pre- and postoperative neurological examinations determined the incidence of new deficits. RESULTS: The combined use of free-running EMG and myogenic TCE-MEPs detected all eight patients with a new motor deficit after surgery; there was one false-positive report. In three of the eight true-positive cases, an electromyographic abnormality immediately anticipated loss of the myogenic TCE-MEPs. Two patients with abnormal EMGs but unchanged myogenic TCE-MEPs experienced mild postoperative worsening of motor deficits; myogenic TCE-MEPs alone would have generated false-negative reports in these cases. CONCLUSION: During resection of ISCLs, free-running EMG can supplement motor tract monitoring by TCE-MEPs. Segmental and suprasegmental elicitation of neurotonic discharges can be observed in four-limb EMG. Abnormal electromyographic bursts, tonic discharge, or abrupt electromyographic silence may anticipate myogenic TCE-MEP loss and predict a postoperative motor deficit.

scholarly journals High-resolution direct microstimulation mapping of spinal cord motor pathways during resection of an intramedullary tumor

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Gandhi ◽  
Corinne M. Curtis ◽  
Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Intramedullary Tumor ◽  
Intramedullary Tumors ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Supratentorial Gliomas ◽  
Microsurgical Techniques

Despite the use of advanced microsurgical techniques, resection of intramedullary tumors may result in significant postoperative deficits because of the vicinity or invasion of important functional tracts. Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials has been used previously to limit such complications. Electromyography offers an opportunity for the surgeon to map the eloquent tissue associated with the tumor using intraoperative motor fiber stimulation. Similar to the use of cortical simulation in the resection of supratentorial gliomas, this technique can potentially advance the safety of intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection. The authors describe the use of intraoperative motor fiber tract stimulation to map the corticospinal tracts associated with an intramedullary tumor. This technique led to protection of these tracts during resection of the tumor.

The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials during Surgery for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors

Neurosurgery ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1327-1336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobu Morota ◽  
Vedran Deletis ◽  
Shlomi Constantini ◽  
Markus Kofler ◽  
Henry Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumors ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord

Objective assessment of cervical spinal cord injury levels by transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potentials

2006 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Shields ◽  
Yi Ping Zhang ◽  
Lisa B.E. Shields ◽  
Darlene A. Burke ◽  
Steven D. Glassman
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Cord Injury

Transvertebral Transposition of the Spinal Cord for Recovery of Motor Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials After Acute Paraplegia During Kyphoscoliosis Surgery: Technique Note, Case Reports and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Chen ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Bingjin Wang ◽  
Lingwei Zhu ◽  
Yong Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Acute Paraplegia

Abstract Background: Neurological impairment during spinal deformity surgery was the most serious complication. When confronting intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alerts, various surgical management methods such as the release of implants and decompression of the spinal cord are always performed. Transvertebral transposition of the spinal cord is rarely performed, and its role in the management of acute paraplegia is seldom reported.Methods: The authors present two patients with kyphoscoliosis experienced intraoperatively or postoperatively neurological deficits and abnormal neurological monitoring was detected during correction surgery. Acute paraplegia was confirmed by a wake-up test. Subsequent spinal cord transposition was performed. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring motor evoked potentials (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) was performed to detect the changes during the process.Results: After transvertebral transposition of the spinal cord, the MEPs and SEPs were significantly improved in both patients during surgery. The spinal cord function was restored postoperatively and recovered to normal at the final follow-up in two patients. Conclusions： This case demonstrated that instead of decreasing the correction ratio of kyphoscoliosis, transvertebral transposition of the spinal cord under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring could be an effective therapeutic strategy for acute spinal cord dysfunction caused by deformity correction surgeries.

Incidence of ischemic complications and technical nuances of arteries protection for insular gliomas resection.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zonggang Hou ◽  
Zhenxing Huang ◽  
Zhenye Li ◽  
Gen Li ◽  
Yaokai Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Diffusion Weighted Imaging ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Acute Ischemia ◽  
Critical Ischemia ◽  
Diffusion Weighted ◽  
Ischemic Complications

Abstract Insular gliomas remain surgically challenge due to their complex anatomical position and microvascular supply. The incidence of ischemic complications is a risk that should not be ignored. The goal of this study was to analyze the incidence of ischemia and its risk factors, and also describe a single surgeon's arteries protection experience of insular gliomas resection. The authors studied 75 consecutive cases of insular gliomas that underwent transcortical tumor resection in their division. Analysis included pre- and postoperative demographic, clinical, radiological including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), as well as intraoperative neurophysiology data, and functional outcomes. Strategies such as “Residual Triangle”, “Basal Ganglia Reconstruction” and “Sculpting Technique” were used to protect lateral lenticulostriate arteries and main branches of M2 for maximal tumor resection according to the different classification of Berger-Sinai. Postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging showed acute ischemia in 44 patients, only 9 of whom developed new motor deficits. Flat inner edge (OR 0.144 95% CI 0.024, 0.876), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (<50%) (OR 18.182, 95% CI 3.311, 100.00) were determined to have significant associations with postoperative Critical Ischemia, which located in the posterior limb of the internal capsule or corona radiata. For insular gliomas resection, the protection of main branches of MCA is important. Insular gliomas resection might be with high incidence of ischemia uncovered by DWI which not always result in neurological deficits. Their own strategies maybe the feasible technical nuances allow the surgeon to achieve a thorough and safe resection. Motor evoked potentials is essential for its resection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document