Changes in Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials during Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Resection Correlate with Postoperative Motor Function

Neurosurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Function ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials

scholarly journals High-resolution direct microstimulation mapping of spinal cord motor pathways during resection of an intramedullary tumor

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Gandhi ◽  
Corinne M. Curtis ◽  
Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Intramedullary Tumor ◽  
Intramedullary Tumors ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Supratentorial Gliomas ◽  
Microsurgical Techniques

Despite the use of advanced microsurgical techniques, resection of intramedullary tumors may result in significant postoperative deficits because of the vicinity or invasion of important functional tracts. Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials has been used previously to limit such complications. Electromyography offers an opportunity for the surgeon to map the eloquent tissue associated with the tumor using intraoperative motor fiber stimulation. Similar to the use of cortical simulation in the resection of supratentorial gliomas, this technique can potentially advance the safety of intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection. The authors describe the use of intraoperative motor fiber tract stimulation to map the corticospinal tracts associated with an intramedullary tumor. This technique led to protection of these tracts during resection of the tumor.

scholarly journals Intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (Suppl1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Mari L. Groves ◽  
Patricia L. Zadnik ◽  
Pablo F. Recinos ◽  
Violette Renard ◽  
George I. Jallo
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
High Definition ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor

The authors present a case of a 27-year-old patient who presented with spastic gait and worsening difficulty walking over a 6 month period. Spinal MR imaging revealed a heterogeneously enhancing intramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) with associated syrinx in the cervical spine. The lesion was resected through posterior en bloc laminotomy, durotomy, and microscopic resection of the intramedullary component followed by laminoplasty reconstruction. Surgical resections with a goal of gross total resection can significantly improve overall survival and progression free survival in patients with low-grade IMSCT. The procedure is presented in an edited, high-definition format with accompanying narrative. The video can be found here: http://youtu.be/Ui9bn82PtP8.

Spinal Cord Monitoring

2016 ◽  
pp. 798-832
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Strommen ◽  
Andrea J. Boon
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Neurophysiological Monitoring ◽  
Spinal Root ◽  
Compound Muscle Action Potentials ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is a valuable tool to preserve spinal cord and spinal root integrity during surgical procedures. A monitoring plan may include somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), compound muscle action potentials (CMAP), and electromyography (EMG). Such monitoring is individualized depending on the preoperative clinical deficit, the structures most at risk, and the surgical and anesthesia plan. The most common use of these techniques is in primary spine disease, where the spinal cord pathways will typically be monitored with both MEP and SEP. In cervical or lumbar spine surgeries, EMG monitoring will help protect the nerve root either during decompression or during pedicle screw placement. Monitoring during spinal cord tumor resection or vascular procedures (such as aortic aneurysm repair) not only helps prevent deficit, but also allows the surgeon to proceed with confidence and not unnecessarily terminate the procedure.

Dorsal Column Mapping for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor Resection Decreases Dorsal Column Dysfunction

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankit Indravadan Mehta ◽  
Cindy A. Mohrhaus ◽  
Aatif M. Husain ◽  
Isaac O. Karikari ◽  
Betsy Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor

Dorsal Column Mapping via Phase Reversal Method

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh Nair ◽  
Vishakhadatta M. Kumaraswamy ◽  
Diana Braver ◽  
Ronan D. Kilbride ◽  
Lawrence F. Borges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Somatosensory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Reliable Technique ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Phase Reversal

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Safe resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors can be challenging, because they often alter the cord anatomy. Identification of neurophysiologically viable dorsal columns (DCs) and of neurophysiologically inert tissue, eg, median raphe (MR), as a safe incision site is crucial for avoiding postoperative neurological deficits. We present our experience with and improvements made to our previously described technique of DC mapping, successfully applied in a series of 12 cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new, safe, and reliable technique for intraoperative DC mapping. METHODS: The right and left DCs were stimulated by using a bipolar electric stimulator and the triggered somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the scalp. Phase reversal and amplitude changes of somatosensory evoked potentials were used to neurophysiologically identify the laterality of DCs, the inert MR, as well as other safe incision sites. RESULTS: The MR location was neurophysiologically confirmed in all patients in whom this structure was first visually identified as well as in those in whom it was not, with 1 exception. DCs were identified in all patients, regardless of whether they could be visually identified. In 3 cases, negative mapping with the use of this method enabled the surgeon to reliably identify additional inert tissue for incision. None of the patients had postoperative worsening of the DC function. CONCLUSION: Our revised technique is safe and reliable, and it can be easily incorporated into routine intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection. It provides crucial information to the neurosurgeon to prevent postoperative neurological deficits.

scholarly journals Resection of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor under Awake Anesthesia: A Novel Approach to Minimize Postoperative Motor Deficits

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
Ahsan Ali Khan ◽  
Lukui Chen ◽  
Xiaoyuan Guo ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
Guojian Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Spinal Cord Tumors ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord ◽  
Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Sensory Evoked

Objective To observe advantages and disadvantages of the resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumor under awake anesthesia. Methods Two patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumor underwent resection under awake anesthesia and followed up post-operatibely for any motor deficits. Results Patients who underwent tumor resection under awake (AAA) anesthesia combined with intraoperative NPM had no motor deficits postoperatively. More accurate and nondelayed responses were observed in the awake cycle of anesthesia and helped guide surgery, thus avoiding injuries to the spinal cord. Conclusion Intramedullary spinal cord tumors are not common, but only gross total resection (GTR) can provide complete remission of symptoms and progression-free survival. However, GTR sometimes results in motor function deficits postoperatively, particularly when the cervical cord is involved, and especially if surgery is done under general anesthesia with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (NPM) alone, because of delayed sensory evoked potential and motor evoked potential responses. We present two cases that underwent GTR of cervical intramedullary spinal cord tumors under an asleep-awake-asleep (AAA) cycle of anesthesia, combined with intraoperative NPM in which no postoperative motor deficits were observed on 6-months follow up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document