Impact of Intraoral Soft-Tissue Reconstruction on the Development of Quality of Life after Ablative Surgery in Patients with Oral Cancer

Abstract Background:Open and closed fractures can be associated with posttraumatic or postoperative soft tissue defects caused by initial trauma, operative procedures or infections. This study evaluated the outcomes of postoperative qualities ofpatients with open or closed lower leg fractures,related softtissue defects, and subsequent flap coverage.Methods:We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study in a level 1 trauma center. We analyzed thepatients treated fromJanuary 2012 through December 2017 and recorded demographics, treatment, and outcome data.The outcome data were measured via patient-reported Foot and Ankle Outcomes Scores (FAOS) and EQ-5D-5L scores.Results: We included 22 patients with complicated fractures (11 open and 11 closed) and subsequent softtissue defects and flap coverages. The mean follow-up time was 41.2 months. Twenty-onepatients developed infections, and necrosis at the site of surgery manifested in all closed fractures. Therefore, all patients needed soft tissue reconstructions. Preoperatively, 16patients underwent arterial examinations via angiography and sixunderwent ultrasound examinations of the venous system. Ten patients had complications involving the flaps due to ischemia and consequent necrosis. The mean EQ-5D index was 0.62 ± 0.27, EQ-5DVAS score was 57.7 ± 20.2. The mean FAOS was 60.7 ± 22.2; in particular,quality of life was 32.3± 28.8. The rate of returning to work in our patient groupwas 37.5% after one year.Conclusions:Distal tibial fracturesoften require revisions and soft tissue reconstruction. The evaluated patient population had poor outcomes in terms of function, quality of life and return to work. Our results imply that the severity of associated soft tissue damage with many revision operations and flap complications lead to a poorer outcome with respect to patients without flap ischemia.

Download Full-text

Central perforated VRAM flap and neurostimulated levator augmentation for functional and aesthetical reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision in cancer

Technology and Health Care ◽

10.3233/thc-213021 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Silvia Bernuth ◽

Michael Jakubietz ◽

Christoph Isbert ◽

Joachim Reibetanz ◽

Rainer Meffert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Interdisciplinary Collaboration ◽

Life Quality ◽

Objective Evaluation ◽

Abdominoperineal Excision ◽

Soft Tissue Coverage ◽

Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽

Sphincter Function

BACKGROUND: Preservation of quality of life regarding fecal continence after abdominoperineal excision (APE) in cancer is challenging. Simultaneous soft tissue coverage and restoration of continence mechanism can be provided through an interdisciplinary collaboration of colorectal and plastic reconstructive surgery. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of surgical procedure and outcome combining soft tissue reconstruction using a central perforated vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM), implementing a perineostoma and restoring anorectal angle augmenting the levator ani by neurostimulated graciloplasty. METHODS: 14 Patients underwent APE due to cancer. In all patients coverage was achieved by pedicled VRAM and simultaneous pull-through descendostomy (perineostoma). 10 of those patients received a levator augmentation additionally. Postoperative complications, functional measures of continence as well as quality of life were obtained. RESULTS: Perineal minor complication rate was 43% without need of surgical intervention. All but one VRAM survived. Continence measures and disease specific life quality showed a good preservation of continence in most patients. CONCLUSION: The results present a complex therapy option accomplished by a collaboration of two highly specialized partners (visceral and plastic surgery) after total loss of the sphincter function and consecutive fecal insufficiency after APE.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of tissue reconstruction in distal lower leg fractures: a retrospective cohort study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-26620/v4 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Emrah Aydogan ◽

Stefan Langer ◽

Christoph Josten ◽

Johannes Maria Karl Fakler ◽

Ralf Henkelmann

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Lower Leg ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Soft Tissue Defects ◽

Tissue Reconstruction ◽

Closed Fractures ◽

The Mean ◽

Tissue Defects

Abstract Background: Open and closed fractures can be associated with posttraumatic or postoperative soft tissue defects caused by initial trauma, operative procedures, or infections. This study evaluated the postoperative outcomes in patients with open or closed lower leg fractures, related soft tissue defects, and subsequent flap coverage.Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study in a level 1 trauma center. We analyzed the patients treated from January 2012 through December 2017 and recorded demographics, treatment, and outcome data. The outcome data were measured via patient-reported Foot and Ankle Outcomes Scores (FAOS) and EQ-5D-5L scores.Results: We included 22 patients with complicated fractures (11 open and 11 closed) and subsequent soft tissue defects and flap coverages. The mean follow-up time was 41.2 months. Twenty-one patients developed infections, and necrosis at the site of surgery manifested in all closed fractures. Therefore, all patients needed soft tissue reconstructions. Preoperatively, 16 patients underwent arterial examinations via angiography and six underwent ultrasound examinations of the venous system. Ten patients had complications involving the flaps due to ischemia and consequent necrosis. The mean EQ-5D index was 0.62 ± 0.27, and EQ-5D VAS score was 57.7 ± 20.2. The mean FAOS was 60.7 ± 22.2; in particular, quality of life was 32.3 ± 28.8. The rate of returning to work in our patient group was 37.5% after one year.Conclusions: Distal tibial fractures often require revisions and soft tissue reconstruction. The evaluated patient population had poor outcomes in terms of function, quality of life, and return to work. Furthermore, patients suffering from flap ischemia have worse outcomes than those without flap ischemia.

Download Full-text

Chest Wall Reconstruction Following Tumor

10.2310/ps.10048 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Farooq Shahzad ◽

Evan Matros

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Chest Wall ◽

Free Flaps ◽

Chest Wall Reconstruction ◽

Chest Wall Tumor ◽

Soft Tissue Coverage ◽

Soft Tissue Reconstruction ◽

Pedicled Flaps ◽

Ablative Surgery ◽

Tissue Reconstruction

Plastic surgeons are typically called upon to reconstruct the chest wall in four situations: oncologic resection, infections, trauma and osteoradionecrosis. In this chapter we will discuss post-oncologic reconstruction. Chest wall reconstruction following tumor resection is typically performed at the same setting as the ablative surgery; this results in quicker patient recovery and overall better outcomes. The reconstruction should be planned with the ablative surgeon so that an assessment can be made of the extent of resection and available donor sites for reconstruction. The major components of reconstruction are 1) skeletal support and 2) soft tissue coverage. Skeletal support is indicated if the defect is >5 cm, 4 or more ribs are removed or more than 2/3rd of the sternum is resected. Prosthetic mesh is most commonly used. Soft tissue reconstruction is performed with regional pedicled flaps in the vast majority of cases. Free flaps are used when regional flaps are not sufficient (large defects) or not available. This review contains 11 figures, 3 tables, and 49 references. Keywords: chest wall, tumor, skeletal reconstruction, soft tissue reconstruction, mesh, acellular dermal matrix, titanium osteosynthesis systems, resorbable plates, pedicled flaps, free flaps

Download Full-text

Outcomes of tissue reconstruction in distal lower leg fractures: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-020-03827-9 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Emrah Aydogan ◽

Stefan Langer ◽

Christoph Josten ◽

Johannes Karl Maria Fakler ◽

Ralf Henkelmann

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Lower Leg ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Soft Tissue Defects ◽

Tissue Reconstruction ◽

Closed Fractures ◽

The Mean ◽

Tissue Defects

Abstract Background Open and closed fractures can be associated with posttraumatic or postoperative soft tissue defects caused by initial trauma, operative procedures, or infections. This study evaluated the postoperative outcomes in patients with open or closed lower leg fractures, related soft tissue defects, and subsequent flap coverage. Methods We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study in a level 1 trauma center. We analyzed the patients treated from January 2012 through December 2017 and recorded demographics, treatment, and outcome data. The outcome data were measured via patient-reported Foot and Ankle Outcomes Scores (FAOS) and EQ-5D-5L scores. Results We included 22 patients with complicated fractures (11 open and 11 closed) and subsequent soft tissue defects and flap coverages. The mean follow-up time was 41.2 months. Twenty-one patients developed infections, and necrosis at the site of surgery manifested in all closed fractures. Therefore, all patients needed soft tissue reconstructions. Preoperatively, 16 patients underwent arterial examinations via angiography and six underwent ultrasound examinations of the venous system. Ten patients had complications involving the flaps due to ischemia and consequent necrosis. The mean EQ-5D index was 0.62 ± 0.27, and EQ-5D VAS score was 57.7 ± 20.2. The mean FAOS was 60.7 ± 22.2; in particular, quality of life was 32.3 ± 28.8. The rate of returning to work in our patient group was 37.5% after 1 year. Conclusions Distal tibial fractures often require revisions and soft tissue reconstruction. The evaluated patient population had poor outcomes in terms of function, quality of life, and return to work. Furthermore, patients suffering from flap ischemia have worse outcomes than those without flap ischemia.

Download Full-text