Ulnar Nerve Instability

1977 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. LAZARO III
Author(s):  
I. Zaltz ◽  
P. M. Waters ◽  
J. R. Kasser

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas L. Matzon ◽  
Kevin F. Lutsky ◽  
C. Edward Hoffler ◽  
Nayoung Kim ◽  
Mitchell Maltenfort ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 168-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent DeGeorge ◽  
Sanjeev Kakar

Background We designed a survey to ascertain the current perspectives of hand surgeons on the evaluation and management of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow. The secondary aim was to assess the concordance of hand surgeons on definitions of the terms “subluxated” and “dislocated” for classification of ulnar nerve instability. Methods A questionnaire, including demographic practice variables, cubital tunnel practice patterns, preoperative imaging and electrodiagnostic evaluation, and a series of standardized intraoperative photographs of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow were developed and distributed to the current American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) membership. Results A total of 690 (26.8%) members completed the survey; 84.2% of respondents indicated that they evaluate for ulnar nerve instability preoperatively with clinical examination, whereas only 6.1% indicated they routinely obtained dynamic ultrasound. Respondents indicated that the factors most strongly influencing their decision to proceed with anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve were subluxation on physical examination (89.6%), history consistent with ulnar nerve subluxation (85.8%), and muscle atrophy (43.2%). On review of clinical photographs, respondents demonstrated varying degrees of agreement on the terms “subluxated” or “dislocated” and recommendations for ulnar nerve transposition at intermediate degrees of ulnar nerve instability. Conclusion ASSH members routinely evaluate for ulnar nerve instability with history and clinical examination without uniform use of preoperative ultrasound, and nearly half of the time the decision to transpose the ulnar nerve is made intraoperatively. Definitions for the degree of ulnar nerve instability at the elbow are not uniformly agreed upon, and further development of a classification system may be warranted to standardize treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Ho Kwak ◽  
Seung-Jun Lee ◽  
Jung Yun Bae ◽  
Hee Seok Jeong ◽  
Sang Woo Kang ◽  
...  

Osborne’s modified decompression involves repairing Osborne’s ligament beneath the ulnar nerve after simple decompression for idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. In this retrospective interrupted time series, 31 patients underwent modified simple decompression and 20 patients underwent conventional simple decompression. In the modified simple decompression group, the ulnar nerve length was measured at operation in full elbow flexion and extension before and after repair of Osborne’s ligament. Ulnar nerve instability during elbow motion was measured using ultrasonography before operation and at 12 months after operation. In patients treated by modified simple decompression, the ulnar nerve length in full elbow flexion reduced significantly after repair of Osborne’s ligament. At 12 months after surgery, the grade of ulnar nerve instability was lower in the modified simple decompression group than in the conventional simple decompression group. The clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups at 24 months after operation. Level of evidence: III


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey M. Cornelson ◽  
Roberta Sclocco ◽  
Norman W. Kettner

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. e141-e146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Ho Kang ◽  
Byung-Euk Joo ◽  
Ki Hoon Kim ◽  
Byung Kyu Park ◽  
Jaehyung Cha ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document