Cervical Spine Motion in the Sagittal Plane II

Spine ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 467-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. van Mameren ◽  
H. Sanches ◽  
J. Beursgens ◽  
J. Drukker
1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Sawin ◽  
Michael M. Todd ◽  
Vincent C. Traynelis ◽  
Stella B. Farrell ◽  
Antoine Nader ◽  
...  

Background Cervical spine kinetics during airway manipulation are poorly understood. This study was undertaken to quantify the extent and distribution of segmental cervical motion produced by direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation in human subjects without cervical abnormality. Methods Ten patients without clinical or radiographic evidence of cervical spine abnormality underwent laryngoscopy using a #3 Macintosh blade while under general anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. Cervical motion was recorded with continuous lateral fluoroscopy. The intubation sequence was divided into distinct stages and the corresponding fluoroscopic images were digitized. Segmental motion, occiput through C5, was calculated for each stage using the digitized data. Results During exposure and laryngoscope blade insertion, minimal displacement of the skull base and rostral cervical vertebral bodies was observed. Visualization of the larynx created superior rotation of the occiput and C1 in the sagittal plane, and mild inferior rotation of C3-C5. C2 maintained nearneutral posture. This pattern of displacement resulted in extension at each motion segment, with the most significant motion produced at the occipitoatlantal and atlantoaxial joints (mean = 6.8 degrees and 4.7 degrees, respectively). Intubation created slight additional superior rotation at the occiput and C1, without substantial alteration in the posture of C2-C5. After laryngoscope removal, position trended toward baseline at all levels, although exact neutral posture was not regained. Conclusions This investigation quantifies the behavior of the normal cervical spine during direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade. With this maneuver, the vast majority of cervical motion is produced at the occipitoatlantal and atlantoaxial joints. The subaxial cervical segments (C2-C5) are displaced only minimally. This study establishes a highly reliable and reproducible method for analyzing cervical motion in real time.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith A. Petschauer ◽  
Randy Schmitz ◽  
Diane L. Gill

Abstract Context: Proper management of cervical spine injuries in men's lacrosse players depends in part upon the ability of the helmet to immobilize the head. Objective: To determine if properly and improperly fitted lacrosse helmets provide adequate stabilization of the head in the spine-boarded athlete. Design: Crossover study. Setting: Sports medicine research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Eighteen healthy collegiate men's lacrosse players. Intervention(s): Participants were asked to move their heads through 3 planes of motion after being secured to a spine board under 3 helmet conditions. Main Outcome Measure(s): Change in range of motion in the cervical spine was calculated for the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes for both head-to-thorax and helmet-to-thorax range of motion in all 3 helmet conditions (properly fitted, improperly fitted, and no helmet). Results: Head-to-thorax range of motion with the properly fitted and improperly fitted helmets was greater than in the no-helmet condition (P < .0001). In the sagittal plane, range of motion was greater with the improperly fitted helmet than with the properly fitted helmet. No difference was observed in helmet-to-thorax range of motion between properly and improperly fitted helmet conditions. Head-to-thorax range of motion was greater than helmet-to-thorax range of motion in all 3 planes (P < .0001). Conclusions: Cervical spine motion was minimized the most in the no-helmet condition, indicating that in lacrosse players, unlike football players, the helmet may need to be removed before stabilization.


1982 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 959-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dimnet ◽  
A. Pasquet ◽  
M.H. Krag ◽  
M.M. Panjabi

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 1369-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Kelly ◽  
Nephi A. Zufelt ◽  
Elizabeth J. Sander ◽  
Denis J. DiAngelo

1988 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 769-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Moroney ◽  
Albert B. Schultz ◽  
James A.A. Miller ◽  
Gunnar B.J. Andersson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document