Preservation of the human pancreas before islet isolation using a two-layer (UW solution???perfluorochemical) cold storage method1

2002 ◽  
pp. 1809-1811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan R. T. Lakey ◽  
Toshiaki Tsujimura ◽  
A. M. James Shapiro ◽  
Yoshikazu Kuroda
1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold H. Contractor ◽  
Paul R. V. Johnson ◽  
David R. Chadwick ◽  
Gavin S. M. Robertson ◽  
Nicholas J. M. London

University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is used extensively as a cold storage solution during the procurement and transport of the pancreas prior to islet isolation. However, it has been observed that UW inhibits the collagenase digestion phase of human but not porcine islet isolation, resulting in poor islet yields and islets of poor viability. The aim of this study was, therefore, to confirm this species difference and to determine which components of UW are responsible for the inhibition in the human. In the initial experiment, blocks of human and porcine pancreas (n = 7) were incubated in test tubes containing collagenase at a concentration of 4 mg/mL at 37°C dissolved in 4 mL of either Hanks' solution or UW. Every 5 min the tubes were manually shaken and the degree of tissue dissociation scored on a scale of + and +++. Our results confirm the inhibition of collagenase digestion in the human but not the pig. Using the same methodology, we then investigated the components of UW that were causing the observed inhibition in the human pancreas (n = 7). This time the collagenase was dissolved in individual or combinations of UW components. Using Hank's as a control, the results were then expressed as a median ratio. The components found to be most inhibitory were magnesium, the Na+/K+ ratio, hydroxyethyl starch (HES), and adenosine. Allopurinol in combination with either lactobionate or glutathione was markedly inhibitory (i.e., median ratio 1.8 and 1.9, respectively). The most inhibitory solution tested was a combination of the three components raffinose, glutathione, and lactobionate (median ratio 2.1). This combination was almost as inhibitory as UW itself (median ratio 2.7). These findings are essential for the development of effective cold-storage solutions for the human pancreas that do not inhibit the subsequent collagenase digestion phase of islet isolation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. S645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Tanioka ◽  
Y. Suzuki ◽  
T. Deai ◽  
K. Suzuki ◽  
I. Matsumoto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason B. Doppenberg ◽  
Marjolein Leemkuil ◽  
Marten A. Engelse ◽  
Christina Krikke ◽  
Eelco J.P. de Koning ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
NEVILLE V. JAMIESON ◽  
RALF SUNDBERG ◽  
SUSANNE LINDELL ◽  
KERSTIN CLAESSON ◽  
JON MOEN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Mingxiao Guo ◽  
Chunlei Lu ◽  
Ying Gao ◽  
Haifeng Zhang ◽  
Dongfeng Chen ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives. The intestinal mucosa is extremely sensitive to ischemia. Better intestinal preservation is the first step to improve the results of intestinal transplantation. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of cold Lifor solution on preservation of swine small bowel.Methods. Swine ileum segments (200 cm) were allotransplanted heterotopically after 9-hour cold storage with UW solution (group 1,n=6), with Lifor solution (group 2,n=6), or without storage (group 3,n=6), respectively. After cold storage, mucosal adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentrations and histopathologic analysis after preservation were performed. At day 7 after the transplantation, intestinal absorptive function was also observed.Results. After 9 h cold preservation, pathological changes, the content of ATP in the intestinal mucosa, and the intestinal absorptive function after transplantation in group 2 were similar to those of group 1.Conclusion. The effect of cold storage of swine small bowel with Lifor solution is similar to that of UW solution. It may provide additional rationale for further exploration of Lifor as an alternative preservation solution in small bowel transplantation.


1997 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Une ◽  
A. Atiya ◽  
S. Ohtsuka ◽  
S. Arita ◽  
T. Kawahara ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 577-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seikon Kin ◽  
Edic Stephanian ◽  
Paul Gores ◽  
Ken Shirabe ◽  
Tsuneo Tanaka ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yin ◽  
M.H. Booster ◽  
G.J. Vusse ◽  
J.G. Maessen ◽  
W.A. Buurman ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul T.R. van Suylichem ◽  
Jan-Erik H.M. van Deijnen ◽  
Gerrit H.J. Wolters ◽  
Reinout van Schilfgaarde

Because collagen is the major target in the enzymatic dissociation of the pancreas for islet isolation, we determined the amount of collagen and its distribution in a comparative study comprising normal pancreata of rat, dog, man, young pig, and adult pig. Collagen content was determined using a colorimetric method and its distribution was assessed in tissue sections stained with Sirius red. The collagen content is relatively low in the rat and adult pig pancreas, and the amount of collagen is relatively low in the septa of the rat and dog pancreas. Not the amount of collagen in the septa but collagen in the rest of the pancreas, mainly located between the acini, seems to determine the dissociation of the pancreatic tissue. This can be exemplified by the higher islet yields obtained from the adult vs. the young pig pancreas; the latter contains a higher total amount of collagen but a similar, relatively high, amount of collagen in the septa. A high amount of collagen surrounding the islets seems to be of secondary importance in islet isolations, because yields of the same magnitude are obtained from the canine and human pancreas containing a relatively low vs. high amount of collagen around the islets but a similar total collagen content. The rat pancreas contains both a low total amount of collagen and a high amount of collagen around the islets; therefore, the general experience that islet isolation procedures are effective in rats can be readily understood.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document