Are Public Health Services Available Where They Are Most Needed? An Examination of Local Health Department Services

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Mete ◽  
Joan P. Cioffi ◽  
Maureen Y. Lichtveld
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Bekemeier ◽  
Seungeun Park

Abstract Objective Standardized data regarding the distribution, quality, reach, and variation in public health services provided at the community level and in wide use across states and communities do not exist. This leaves a major gap in our nation’s understanding of the value of prevention activities and, in particular, the contributions of our government public health agencies charged with assuring community health promotion and protection. Public health and community leaders, therefore, are eager for accessible and comparable data regarding preventive services that can inform policy decisions about where to invest resources. Methods We used literature review and a practice-based approach, employing an iterative process to identify factors that facilitate data provision among public health practitioners. Results This paper describes the model, systematically developed by our research team and with input from practice partners, that guides our process toward maximizing the uptake and integration of these standardized measures into state and local data collection systems. Discussion The model we developed, using a dissemination and implementation science framework, is intended to foster greater interest in and accountability for data collection around local health department services and to facilitate spatial exploration and statistical analysis of local health department service distribution, change, and performance. Conclusion Our model is the first of its kind to thoroughly develop a means to guide research and practice in realizing the National Academy of Medicine’s recommendation for developing systems to measure and track state and local public health system contributions to population health.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-312
Author(s):  
Eko Setiawan ◽  
Y. Titik Haryati

Public health centers is a technical implementation unit of Local Health Department which is responsible for conducting health efforts forh the whole society and as a first-rate health services that directly reach the whole community to achieve a healthy and prosperous society.The purpose of this study is to determine the ability of Community Health Center in managing the resources and how wide the coverage range of the Community Health Centre in district of Semarang.This study using vaariable input and output.The input which is used is consisting of four variables, they are: the number of medical personnel, the number of non-medical personnel, financing sourced from regional government budget and the number of integrated service post.. While the outputvariables are the health services towards toddlers, the immunization coverage, the number of outpatient visits and coverage of births assisted by health personnel The data used was secondary data obtained from Local Health Department in district of Semarang, Central Bureau of Statistics and other sources.From the calculation of DEA, the results are, in 18 Community Health Centers are technically efficient and 8 Community Health Centers are technically inefficient.Unit public health centers that have efficient will be comparison for puskesmas that not efficient. For public health centers inefficient technically can improve efficiency value by raising output based on the calculation on DEA. Suggested the results of the efficiency with the dea can be used as an alternative to assess the efficiency of public health centers in kabupaten semarang regularly and as one input to assess, monitor and improved performance public health centers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joie D. Acosta ◽  
Lane Burgette ◽  
Anita Chandra ◽  
David P. Eisenman ◽  
Ingrid Gonzalez ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo summarize ways that networks of community-based organizations (CBO), in partnership with public health departments, contribute to community recovery from disaster.MethodsThe study was conducted using an online survey administered one and 2 years after Hurricane Sandy to the partnership networks of 369 CBO and the New York Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. The survey assessed the structure and durability of networks, how they were influenced by storm damage, and whether more connected networks were associated with better recovery outcomes.ResultsDuring response and recovery, CBOs provide an array of critical public health services often outside their usual scope. New CBO partnerships were formed to support recovery, particularly in severely impacted areas. CBOs that were more connected to other CBOs and were part of a long-term recovery committee reported greater impacts on the community; however, a partnership with the local health department was not associated with recovery impacts.ConclusionCBO partners are flexible in their scope of services, and CBO partnerships often emerge in areas with the greatest storm damage, and subsequently the greatest community needs. National policies will advance if they account for the dynamic and emergent nature of these partnerships and their contributions, and clarify the role of government partners. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:635–643)


1988 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 717-717
Author(s):  
H S Teitelbaum ◽  
J McLaughlin ◽  
L Barnaby ◽  
A Paskilas ◽  
S Helgerson ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin P. Wasserman ◽  
Nancy Rawding ◽  
John M. Aberle-Grasse

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document