Hemodynamic Effects of Spinal Anesthesia in the Elderly

1997 ◽  
Vol XLI (2) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
J. F. FAVAREL-GARRIGUES ◽  
F. SZTARK ◽  
M. E. PETITJEAN ◽  
M. Thicp?? ◽  
P. Lassi?? ◽  
...  
1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Favarel-Garrigues ◽  
F. Sztark ◽  
M. E. Petitjean ◽  
M. Thicoipe ◽  
P. Lassie ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Favarel-Garrigues ◽  
F. Sztark ◽  
M. E. Petitjean ◽  
M. Thicoipe ◽  
P. Lassie ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Ben-David ◽  
Roman Frankel ◽  
Tatianna Arzumonov ◽  
Yuri Marchevsky ◽  
Gershon Volpin

Background Spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in the elderly is associated with a high incidence of hypotension. The synergism between intrathecal opioids and local anesthetics may make it possible to achieve reliable spinal anesthesia with minimal hypotension using a minidose of local anesthetic. Methods Twenty patients aged > or = 70 yr undergoing surgical repair of hip fracture were randomized into two groups of 10 patients each. Group A received a spinal anesthetic of bupivacaine 4 mg plus fentanyl 20 microg, and group B received 10 mg bupivacaine. Hypotension was defined as a systolic pressure of < 90 mmHg or a 25% decrease in mean arterial pressure from baseline. Hypotension was treated with intravenous ephedrine boluses 5-10 mg up to a maximum 50 mg, and thereafter by phenylephrine boluses of 100-200 microg. Results All patients had satisfactory anesthesia. One of 10 patients in group A required ephedrine, a single dose of 5 mg. Nine of 10 patients in group B required vasopressor support of blood pressure. Group B patients required an average of 35 mg ephedrine, and two patients required phenylephrine. The lowest recorded systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures as fractions of the baseline pressures were, respectively, 81%, 84%, and 85% versus 64%, 69%, and 64% for group A versus group B. Conclusions A "minidose" of 4 mg bupivacaine in combination with 20 microg fentanyl provides spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in the elderly. The minidose combination caused dramatically less hypotension than 10 mg bupivacaine and nearly eliminated the need for vasopressor support of blood pressure.


Author(s):  
Florentino Fernandes Mendes ◽  
Gustavo Hennemann ◽  
Ana Luft ◽  
Carlos Farias ◽  
Sheila Braga

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-74
Author(s):  
Rohini Sigdel ◽  
Maya Lama ◽  
Sanish Gurung ◽  
Bishal Gurung ◽  
Anil Prasad Neupane ◽  
...  

Background: Several methods have been used to prevent post spinal hypotension including preloading, co-loading, use of vasopressors, placement of pelvic wedge, lumbar wedge and tilting of operating table in parturients undergoing cesarean section. We conducted a randomized controlled study to determine the hemodynamic effects of a standard pelvic wedge placed below the right hip immediately after the spinal block till the delivery of baby. Methods: One hundred consenting women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to wedge group (N=50) and control group (N=50). A standard wedge was placed under the right pelvis soon after spinal anesthesia till the delivery of baby in wedge group whereas the control group remained supine. Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure, heart rate, vasopressor consumption, other side effects like nausea, vomiting and neonatal outcome were also recorded. Results: The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was similar between groups (Wedge group 60% vs Control group 75.51%, p=0.125) before the birth of baby. The use of vasopressors (p=0.212), incidence of nausea (p=0.346) and Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes (p=0.629, p=0.442) were also not statistically significant. None of the patients had vomiting. Conclusion: In our study, the use of right pelvic wedge immediately after spinal anesthesia was not effective in preventing post spinal hypotension in elective cesarean section.


1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 706???709 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Darling ◽  
James M. Murray ◽  
A. Moira Hainsworth ◽  
Thomas R. Trinick

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document