scholarly journals Are Discharge Summaries Teachable? The Effects of a Discharge Summary Curriculum on the Quality of Discharge Summaries in an Internal Medicine Residency Program

2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. S5-S8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Myers ◽  
C Komal Jaipaul ◽  
Jennifer R. Kogan ◽  
Susan Krekun ◽  
Lisa M. Bellini ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-804
Author(s):  
Khalid Mohamed Ali Dousa ◽  
Mohammed Muneer ◽  
Ali Rahil ◽  
Ahmed Al-Mohammed ◽  
Dabia AlMohanadi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Morning report, a case-based conference that allows learners and teachers to interact and discuss patient care, is a standard educational feature of internal residency programs, as well as some other specialties. Objective Our intervention was aimed at enhancing the format for morning report in our internal medicine residency program in Doha, Qatar. Intervention In July 2011, we performed a needs assessment of the 115 residents in our internal medicine residency program, using a questionnaire. Resident input was analyzed and prioritized using the percentage of residents who agreed with a given recommendation for improving morning report. We translated the input into interventions that enhanced the format and content, and improved environmental factors surrounding morning report. We resurveyed residents using the questionnaire that was used for the needs assessment. Results Key changes to the format for morning report included improving organization, adding variety to the content, enhancing case selection and the quality of presentations, and introducing patient safety and quality improvement topics into discussions. This led to a morning report format that is resident-driven, and resident-led, and that produces resident-focused learning and quality improvement activities. Conclusions Our revised morning report format is a dynamic tool, and we will continue to tailor and modify it on an ongoing basis in response to participant feedback. We recommend a process of assessing and reassessing morning report for other programs that want to enhance resident interest and participation in clinical and safety-focused discussions.


Diagnosis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shwetha Iyer ◽  
Erin Goss ◽  
Casey Browder ◽  
Gerald Paccione ◽  
Julia Arnsten

Abstract Background Errors in medicine are common and often tied to diagnosis. Educating physicians about the science of cognitive decision-making, especially during medical school and residency when trainees are still forming clinical habits, may enhance awareness of individual cognitive biases and has the potential to reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient safety. Methods The authors aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a clinical reasoning curriculum for Internal Medicine residents. The authors developed and delivered a clinical reasoning curriculum to 47 PGY2 residents in an Internal Medicine Residency Program at a large urban hospital. The clinical reasoning curriculum consists of six to seven sessions with the specific aims of: (1) educating residents on cognitive steps and reasoning strategies used in clinical reasoning; (2) acknowledging the pitfalls of clinical reasoning and learning how cognitive biases can lead to clinical errors; (3) expanding differential diagnostic ability and developing illness scripts that incorporate discrete clinical prediction rules; and (4) providing opportunities for residents to reflect on their own clinical reasoning (also known as metacognition). Results Forty-seven PGY2 residents participated in the curriculum (2013–2016). Self-assessed comfort in recognizing and applying clinical reasoning skills increased in 15 of 15 domains (p < 0.05 for each). Resident mean scores on the knowledge assessment improved from 58% pre-curriculum to 81% post curriculum (p = 0.002). Conclusions A case vignette-based clinical reasoning curriculum can effectively increase residents’ knowledge of clinical reasoning concepts and improve residents’ self-assessed comfort in recognizing and applying clinical reasoning skills.


2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (11) ◽  
pp. 1665-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becky N. Lowry ◽  
Lisa M. Vansaghi ◽  
Sally K. Rigler ◽  
Steven W. Stites

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document