The Relationship Between Applicant Gender and Internal Medicine Residency Interview Scores

ABSTRACT Background Gender inequity is widespread in academic medicine, including in the promotion, academic recognition, and compensation of female faculty. Objective To assess whether these inequities extend to the GME intern selection process, this study examines differences in the interview scores assigned to male and female applicants at one large internal medicine residency program. Methods Subjects include 1399 applicants who completed 3099 interviews for internship positions for the Brigham and Women's Hospital internal medicine residency in Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) cycles 2015–2016, 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020. Unadjusted and multivariable linear regressions were used to assess the simultaneous effect of applicant gender, interviewer gender, and applicant academic characteristics on pre-interview, post-interview, and change in interview scores. Results Our analysis included 3027 interviews (97.7%) of 1359 applicants (97.1%). There were no statistically significant differences in the interview scores assigned to female versus male applicants. This was true across pre-interview scores (difference = 0.03, P = .61), post-interview scores (difference = 0.00, P = .98), and change in interview scores (difference = 0.01, P = .24) as well as when adjusting for the baseline academic characteristics of both male and female applicants. This was also true when analyzing individual application years, individual residency tracks, and accounting for the gender of the faculty interviewers. Conclusions The findings do not support the presence of gender inequity in the interview scores assigned to male and female applicants included in this study.

Effect of resident and assessor gender on entrustment-based observational assessment in an internal medicine residency program

Background: Implicit gender bias leads to differences in assessment. Studies examining gender differences in resident milestone assessment data demonstrate variable results. The purpose of this study was to determine if observational entrustment scores differ by resident and assessor gender in a program of assessment based on discrete, observable skills. Methods: We analyzed overall entrustment scores and entrustment scores by Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competency for 238 residents (49% female) from 396 assessors (38% female) in one internal medicine residency program from July 2012 to June 2019. We conducted analyses at 1-12 months, 1-36 months, 1-6 months, 7-12 months, and 31-36 months. We used linear mixed-effect models to assess the role of resident and assessor gender, with resident-specific and assessor-specific random effect to account for repeated measures. Results: Statistically significant interactions existed between resident and assessor gender for overall entrustment at 1-12 months (p < 0.001), 1-36 months (p< 0.001), 1-6 months (p<0.001), 7-12 months (p=0.04), and 31-36 months (p<0.001). However, group differences were not statistically significant. In several instances an interaction was significant between resident and assessor gender by ACGME core competency, but there were no statistically significant group differences for all competencies at any time point. When applicable, subsequent analysis of main effect of resident or assessor gender independently of one another revealed no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: No significant differences in entrustment scores were found based on resident or assessor gender in our large, robust entrustment-based program of assessment. Determining the reasons for our findings may help identify ways to mitigate gender bias in assessment.

Impact of reflective writings on learning of core competencies in medical residents

Introduction: Reflection is a critical component of learning and improvement. It remains unclear as to how it can be effectively developed. We studied the impact of reflective writing in promoting deep reflection in the context of learning Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies among residents in an Internal Medicine Residency programme. Methods: We used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design for this study in 2018. We analysed reflective writings for categories and frequencies of ACGME competencies covered and graded them for levels of reflection. We collected recently graduated residents’ perceptions of the value of reflective writings via individual semi-structured interviews. Results: We interviewed nine (out of 27) (33%) participants and analysed 35 reflective writings. 30 (86%) of the writings showed a deep level (grade A or B) of reflection. Participants reflected on all six ACGME competencies, especially ‘patient care’. Participants were reluctant to write but found benefits of increased understanding, self-awareness and ability to deal with similar future situations, facilitation of self-evaluation and emotional regulation. Supervisors’ guidance and feedback were lacking. Conclusion: We found that a reflective writing programme within an Internal Medicine Residency programme promoted deep reflection. Participants especially used self-reflection to enhance their skills in patient care. We recognised the important role of mentor guidance and feedback in enhancing reflective learning.