scholarly journals Novel Therapy Improves Survival in Elderly Head & Neck Cancer Patients

2022 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Mark L. Fuerst
2013 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. S99
Author(s):  
A. Duffton ◽  
R. Muirhead ◽  
M. Rizwanullah ◽  
C. Paterson ◽  
M. McJury ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S54-S55
Author(s):  
E. Van Weerd ◽  
J. Jacobs ◽  
S. Hutschemaekers ◽  
M. Kroesen ◽  
Y. Klaver ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S790-S791
Author(s):  
X. Ray ◽  
W. Sumner ◽  
L. Sutton ◽  
P. Sanghvi ◽  
I. Deichaite ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Studer ◽  
Claudia Linsenmeier ◽  
Oliver Riesterer ◽  
Yousef Najafi ◽  
Michelle Brown ◽  
...  

In Vivo ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 979-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUDITH BÜNTZEL ◽  
OLIVER MICKE ◽  
KLAUS KISTERS ◽  
JENS BÜNTZEL ◽  
RALPH MÜCKE

Author(s):  
N. Malik ◽  
M. Maganti ◽  
M. McQuestion ◽  
M.C. Tjong ◽  
D. Keilty ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21646-e21646
Author(s):  
Mary Pasquinelli ◽  
Sandra Obilade ◽  
David Rosenberg ◽  
Zane Deliu ◽  
Aakash Shah ◽  
...  

e21646 Background: Identifying and addressing depression, anxiety, and supportive care needs in cancer patients is an emerging standard of care. The Coleman Foundation “Patient Screening Questions for Supportive Care” tool was used with demographic and diagnostic data to investigate the relationships between screening scores. Methods: Lung/head/neck cancer patients at the University of Illinois Cancer Center were screened using the Coleman Foundation tool. This screening tool identified needs in several categories including Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4) scores; practical, family/caregiver, nutritional, treatment, physical, and spiritual/faith/religious concerns; levels of pain, fatigue, physical activity to quantitatively assess patient distress/supportive care needs. Scores were compared with age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, cancer type, and cancer stage. Linear regression was used for statistical analysis. Results: We performed initial screening on 164 lung/head/neck patients ages 36-88 (mean 61), with stages IA to IVC (May 2016 to Jan. 2017). Our findings are summarized in below. We found a 1oeffect that racial/ethnic minority status was significantly correlated with higher scores. We found that lung cancer was correlated with higher screening scores than head & neck on initial screen. Medicare insurance was correlated with significantly lower screening scores. Conclusions: Patients with lung/head/neck cancer have significant needs and concerns that go beyond merely treating their cancer. Our findings show that certain demographic groups have especially high burdens in some specific dimensions and that these specific concerns may be predicted based on diagnostic and demographic information. Thus, these findings serve to inform providers as to where and how to focus supportive care for these patient populations. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document