Does point-of-care ultrasound have patient-care advantages over ultrasound performed in the radiology department in the evaluation of deep venous thrombosis?

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Tim Ramer ◽  
Tanner Nissly
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120
Author(s):  
David Canty ◽  
Kavi Mufti ◽  
Lindsay Bridgford ◽  
André Denault

Global Heart ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Resa E. Lewiss ◽  
Nicole L. Kaban ◽  
Turandot Saul

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e244357
Author(s):  
Nilam J. Soni ◽  
Minh-Phuong T Le ◽  
Maria Inez Velez ◽  
Kevin C. Proud

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan-Ching Lien ◽  
Chih-Heng Chang ◽  
Kah-Meng Chong ◽  
Meng-Che Wu ◽  
Cheng-Yi Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) can serve as a valuable adjunct for patient care. This study aimed to investigate the clinical integration of PoCUS of the first post-graduate year (PGY-1) residents after a PoCUS curriculum.Methods: The prospective study was conducted at the emergency department (ED) of the National Taiwan University Hospital between July 2015 and October 2017. Every PGY-1 resident had one-month ED training and a PoCUS curriculum was implemented during the first week. The post-training objective structured clinical examination global ratings were obtained, as well as the sonographic examinations the residents performed on shifts. Four groups could be identified: group 1 performed PoCUS before and after the curriculum; group 2 performed only after the curriculum; group 3 performed only before the curriculum; the last did not perform any examinations.Results: 239 residents participated. The median global rating was 4 (interquartile ranges, 4-5). After the curriculum, an increasing number of residents integrated PoCUS into patient care (64 vs. 170, p=0.037) with acceptable image quality. No differences existed in the global ratings between 4 groups, however, nearly 30% of residents did not use PoCUS during their shifts. Group 1 performed more cases with better image quality and using ≥2 US applications (8/100 vs. 82/359, p=0.0009), compared with those before the curriculum. Comparing with those in groups 1 and 2, group 1 performed more cases (p<0.0001) with better image quality (p=0.03). “No suitable cases” (25/69), and “choosing other imaging priorities” (43/69) were the main feedbacks in groups 3 and 4.Conclusions: A short focused US training had an immediate positive impact on OSCE global ratings and integration of PoCUS of PGY-1 residents in the ED. The global ratings could not predict whether to use PoCUS in the ED practice. Although the working climate was designated to be friendly for utilizing US, a substantial percentage of residents did not use PoCUS. Further longitudinal studies would be needed for the sustained effects of the curriculum.Trial registration: NCT03738033.


CHEST Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 157 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Walter ◽  
Lewis Satterwhite ◽  
Kenneth E. Lyn-Kew

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garry Nixon ◽  
Katharina Blattner ◽  
Jill Muirhead ◽  
Ngaire Kerse

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the kidney and bladder are among the most commonly performed POCUS scans in rural New Zealand (NZ). AIM To determine the quality, safety and effect on patient care of POCUS of the kidney and bladder in rural NZ. METHODS Overall, 28 doctors in six NZ rural hospitals completed a questionnaire both before and after undertaking a POCUS scan over a 9-month period. The clinical records and saved ultrasound images were reviewed by a specialist panel. RESULTS The 28 participating doctors undertook 138 kidney and 60 bladder scans during the study. POCUS of the bladder as a test for urinary retention had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 88–100) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 93–100). POCUS of the kidney as a test for hydronephrosis had a sensitivity 90% (95% CI 74–96) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 89–98). The accuracy of other findings such as renal stones and bladder clot was lower. POCUS of the bladder appeared to have made a positive contribution to patient care in 92% of cases without evidence of harm. POCUS of the kidney benefited 93% of cases, although in three cases (2%), it may have had a negative effect on patient care. DISCUSSION POCUS as a test for urinary retention and hydronephrosis in the hands of rural doctors was technically straightforward, improved diagnostic certainty, increased discharges and overall had a positive effect on patient care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document