A systematic review of antithrombin concentrate use in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation of severe sepsis

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 521-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian J Wiedermann ◽  
Nicole C Kaneider
Platelets ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathies Appel Laursen ◽  
Julie Brogaard Larsen ◽  
Anne-Mette Hvas

2019 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 182-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Gando ◽  
Atsushi Shiraishi ◽  
Kazuma Yamakawa ◽  
Hiroshi Ogura ◽  
Daizoh Saitoh ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (9_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8S-28S ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrysoula Papageorgiou ◽  
Georges Jourdi ◽  
Eusebe Adjambri ◽  
Amanda Walborn ◽  
Priya Patel ◽  
...  

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is an acquired clinicobiological syndrome characterized by widespread activation of coagulation leading to fibrin deposition in the vasculature, organ dysfunction, consumption of clotting factors and platelets, and life-threatening hemorrhage. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is provoked by several underlying disorders (sepsis, cancer, trauma, and pregnancy complicated with eclampsia or other calamities). Treatment of the underlying disease and elimination of the trigger mechanism are the cornerstone therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic strategies specific for DIC aim to control activation of blood coagulation and bleeding risk. The clinical trials using DIC as entry criterion are limited. Large randomized, phase III clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of antithrombin (AT), activated protein C (APC), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and thrombomodulin (TM) in patients with sepsis, but the diagnosis of DIC was not part of the inclusion criteria. Treatment with APC reduced 28-day mortality of patients with severe sepsis, including patients retrospectively assigned to a subgroup with sepsis-associated DIC. Treatment with APC did not have any positive effects in other patient groups. The APC treatment increased the bleeding risk in patients with sepsis, which led to the withdrawal of this drug from the market. Treatment with AT failed to reduce 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis, but a retrospective subgroup analysis suggested possible efficacy in patients with DIC. Clinical studies with recombinant TFPI or TM have been carried out showing promising results. The efficacy and safety of other anticoagulants (ie, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin) or transfusion of platelet concentrates or clotting factor concentrates have not been objectively assessed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 230-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jecko Thachil

Abstract Anesthesiologists may encounter patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation, a potential complication of severe sepsis or major trauma. This practical guide discusses the clinical approach, laboratory diagnosis, and current management of this condition.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-141
Author(s):  
Sarah Lawrence ◽  
◽  
Andrew Claxton ◽  
Mark Holland ◽  
Jack Hodd ◽  
...  

A 51 year old man presented with severe sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and multiorgan dysfunction after a 24 hour history of diarrhoea and malaise. Despite fluid resuscitation and receiving a platelet transfusion, freshfrozen plasma and intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics, he remained anuric with a worsening metabolic acidosis. He was transferred to critical care for organ support including renal replacement therapy. He subsequently developed purpura fulminans. Blood cultures were positive for Captocytophaga carnimorsis, a gram-negative canine zoonosis that is an underdiagnosed cause of severe sepsis, for which DIC at presentation is characteristic. Treatment is with penicillins and fluoroquinolones. Identification of risk factors for unusual organisms and recognition of DIC allowing prompt treatment is critical for the acute physician.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e024878
Author(s):  
Jumpei Yoshimura ◽  
Kazuma Yamakawa ◽  
Akira Kodate ◽  
Mari Kodate ◽  
Satoshi Fujimi

IntroductionDisseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common and serious condition that can lead to poor outcomes in critically ill patients. To make a correct diagnosis and improve the outcome of patients with DIC, several organisations have put forward DIC scoring systems. However, which criteria is the best to use for diagnosing DIC remains a continuing controversy even though many studies have been conducted to validate the diagnostic accuracy of each DIC scoring system.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of DIC criteria for the prediction of mortality in critically ill adult patients. The primary objective is to assess the predictive values of the DIC criteria of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis and Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for 28-day mortality. We will search electronic bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-II tool. If pooling is appropriate, we will compute parameter estimates using bivariate random-effects and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models to produce summary receiver operating curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity) and 95% confidence regions around the summary operating points. Clinical and methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review will help physicians diagnose DIC accurately and improve their clinical practice in critically ill settings. Approval from an ethics committee is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017079350.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document