scholarly journals Cervical or Thoracic Anastomosis After Esophageal Resection and Gastric Tube Reconstruction

2003 ◽  
Vol 238 (6) ◽  
pp. 803-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Walther ◽  
Jan Johansson ◽  
Folke Johnsson ◽  
Christer Staël von Holstein ◽  
Thomas Zilling
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 108-109
Author(s):  
Eliza Hagens ◽  
Maarten Anderegg ◽  
Mark I Van Berge Henegouwen ◽  
Suzanne Gisbertz

Abstract Background For patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, radical esophageal resection with gastric tube reconstruction preceded by chemo(radio)therapy offers the best chance for cure. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications following esophageal surgery, leading to significant morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, considerable costs, decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Management is complicated and not standardized. The objective is to gain insight into the different opinions on AL management among upper gastrointestinal surgeons and to verify the need for a diagnostic and treatment guideline. Methods Surgeons with particular interest in esophageal surgery, were invited to participate in an online questionnaire. The survey consisted of questions pertaining to the surgeons’ experience, operation characteristics, management routine and their opinion on international guidelines on the diagnosis and therapy of AL. Results Of the 331 invited physicians, 40% participated in the survey. 90.7% Use laboratory diagnostics and 62.8% imaging and/or endoscopy postoperatively on routine basis. In case of suspected AL, the first choice of diagnostic imaging modalities was mostly a CT scan (35.7%) or a dynamic swallow investigation (33.3%). In case of AL, indepently of the clincal manifestations (local symptoms only, medianstinal manifestations or In case of gastric conduit necrosis) the treatment strategies differed widely between surgeons (table 1). Over 70% of the responders agree that there is a need for a solid international guideline on AL management. Conclusion There is no general consensus in the management of AL. There is a need for an international guideline regarding the optimal management of AL. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Logeman ◽  
J.J.J. Borm ◽  
J.J.B. van Lanschot ◽  
M.M.C. Tiel-van Buul ◽  
L.M.A. Akkermans ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-145
Author(s):  
M. Sakai ◽  
R. Muranushi ◽  
H. Saito ◽  
K. Kuriyama ◽  
T. Yoshida ◽  
...  

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiguo Li ◽  
Yan Ma ◽  
Guiting Liu ◽  
Ming Fang ◽  
Yingwei Xue

Abstract Objective Proximal gastrectomy acts as a function-preserving operation for upper-third gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition reconstruction in upper-third gastric cancer. Methods A retrospective review of 301 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition (JI) or gastric tube (GT) at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between June 2007 and December 2016 was performed. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Visick grade were used to evaluate postgastrectomy syndromes. Gastrointestinal fiberoscopy was used to evaluate the prevalence and severity of reflux esophagitis based on the Los Angeles (LA) classification system. Results The JI group had a longer operation time than the GT group (220 ± 52 vs 182 ± 50 min), but no significant difference in blood loss was noted. Compared to the GT group, the Visick grade and GSRS score were significantly higher. Reflux esophagitis was significantly increased in the GT group compared with the JI group. Conclusion Proximal gastrectomy is well tolerated with excellent short-term outcomes in patients with upper-third gastric cancer. Compared with GT construction, JI construction has clear functional advantages and may provide better quality of life for patients with upper-third gastric cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document