Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies

Background:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and surgical characteristics of patients who required reoperation after mechanical mitral valve replacement (MVR).Methods:We retrospectively identified 204 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation after mechanical MVR between 2009 and 2018. Patients were categorized according the reason for reoperation (perivalvular leakage, thrombus formation, or pannus formation). The patients' medical and surgical records were studied carefully and the rates of in-hospital complications were calculated.Results:The mean age was 51±12 years and 44% of the patients were male. The reasons for reoperation were perivalvular leakage (117 patients), thrombus formation (35 patients), and pannus formation (52 patients). The most common positions for perivalvular leakage were at the 6–10 o'clock positions (proportions of ≥25% for each hour position). Most patients had an interval of >10 years between the original MVR and reoperation. The most common reoperation procedure was re-do MVR (157 patients), and 155 of these patients underwent concomitant cardiac procedures. There were 10 in-hospital deaths and 32 patients experienced complications. The 10-year survival rate was 82.2 ± 3.9% in general, and the group of lowest rate was patients with PVL (77.5 ± 5.2%). The independent risk factors were “male” (4.62, 95% CI 1.57–13.58, P = 0.005) and “Hb <9g/dL before redo MV operation” (3.45, 95% CI 1.13–10.49, P = 0.029).Conclusion:Perivalvular leakage was the most common reason for reoperation after mechanical MVR, with a low survival rate in long term follow-up relatively.

MINIMALLY INVASIVE MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT (MIMVR) THROUGH RIGHT MINITHORACOTOMY: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE FROM CENTRAL INDIA

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve replacement surgery (MIMVR) is gaining popularity for its multifold advantages. Here we report our single-institution experience with MIMVR through the right minithoracotomy over two years. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective analytical study. Forty-two patients undergoing MIMVR between August 2019 and July 2021 were included. Recorded perioperative data were collected and evaluated retrospectively. Results: A total of 42 patients were included in the study, of which 29 were females (69%). The mean age was 43.2+/- 8.2 years. Overall 30-day mortality was 2.38% (n = 1). Mean operating time, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamp times were 264.9 ± 48.7, 151.5 ± 39.8, and 89.8 ± 25.6 minutes, respectively. Tricuspid valve annuloplasty was performed in 8 patients (19%). One patient (2.38%) required conversion to median sternotomy, and three patients (7.1%) underwent re-explorations due to bleeding. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. Conclusions: MIMVR through right minithoracotomy is feasible, safe, and reproducible with low mortality and morbidity. Mitral valve surgery through a small anterior thoracotomy is a good alternative to conventional thoracotomy. Keywords: minimally invasive, minithoracotomy, mitral valve replacement

Comments of results after surgical replacement of mechanical mitral and aortic valve in children at Hanoi Heart Hospital

Objective: Assessment of early results after surgical treatment of mechanical mitral valve and aortic valve replacement in children at Hanoi Heart Hospital from 2004 to June 2019. Methods: Analysis and evaluation based on data collected from patients undergoing surgery and from the results of follow-up examination. Results: The total number of patients was 50, in which 34 cases of simple mechanical mitral valve replacement, 16 cases of simple mechanical aortic valve replacement. Average age of surgery: 7.58 ± 6.01 years (The lowest age is 7 months, the highest is 15 years). Male: 29 patients (58%), female: 21 patients (42%). Ultrasound before discharge and after 3 months, we found similar results: mean EF: mechanical mitral valve: 56.28 ± 10.67 %; Aortic valve: 54.72 ± 9.66% .Mean pressure : Mitral valve: 3.18 ± 1.25; Aortic valve: 12.12 ± 3.25 mmHg. INR index: mitral valve : 2.58 ± 1.20; Aortic valve: 2.34 ± 0.92. Complications of valve replacement: 2 cases of mitral valve replacement after surgery 3 years and 4 years; There was 1 case of aortic valve 5 years after surgery. Death immediately after surgery: mitral valve: 2 cases (5.88%); aortic valve: 1 case (6.25%); Late death: After 2 years, there was 1 case of death after mitral valve replacement; After 4 years, there was 1 case of death after aortic valve replacement. Conclusion: The results of heart valve replacement surgery in children are positive. It is necessary to have better equipment and experience in open heart surgery in low-birth-weight children in order to operate the disease as early and effectively as possible, in which the treatment of complications of heart failure and post-operative coagulopathy should be considered important.

Imaging in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: State-of-Art Review

Mitral regurgitation is the second-most frequent valvular heart disease in Europe and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recognition of MR should encourage the assessment of its etiology, severity, and mechanism in order to determine the best therapeutic approach. Mitral valve surgery constitutes the first-line therapy; however, transcatheter procedures have emerged as an alternative option to treat inoperable and high-risk surgical patients. In patients with suitable anatomy, the transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral leaflet repair is the most frequently applied procedure. In non-reparable patients, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has appeared as a promising intervention. Thus, currently TMVR represents a new treatment option for inoperable or high-risk patients with degenerated or failed bioprosthetic valves (valve-in-valve); failed repairs, (valve-in-ring); inoperable or high-risk patients with native mitral valve anatomy, or those with severe annular calcifications, or valve-in-mitral annular calcification. The patient selection requires multimodality imaging pre-procedural planning to select the best approach and device, study the anatomical landing zone and assess the risk of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. In the present review, we aimed to highlight the main considerations for TMVR planning from an imaging perspective; before, during, and after TMVR.