Comparative Outcomes of Cooled Versus Traditional Radiofrequency Ablation of the Lateral Branches for Sacroiliac Joint Pain

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguo Cheng ◽  
Jason E. Pope ◽  
Jarrod E. Dalton ◽  
Olivia Cheng ◽  
Albatoul Bensitel
2021 ◽  
pp. 75-82
Author(s):  
Benjamin K. Homra ◽  
Yashar Eshraghi ◽  
Maged Guirguis

The posterior sacral network is a complex meshwork of lateral branches of the dorsal sacral rami that innervate the posterior aspect of the sacroiliac joint. Pain arising from this joint can be diagnostically targeted using either a fluoroscopic or ultrasound technique to determine if the patient would benefit from radiofrequency ablation of the lateral branches. Injecting local anesthetic near the dorsal foramina using these techniques will temporarily block the transmission of pain by the lateral branches from the sacroiliac joint. This chapter covers the anatomy of the posterior sacral network, discusses the details of the two techniques for lateral branch blocks and evidence for their utility, provides information about the risks and contraindications associated with the techniques, and concludes by discussing the implications of the procedure.


2021 ◽  
pp. 83-92
Author(s):  
Haider M. Ali ◽  
Yashar Eshraghi ◽  
Maged Guirguis

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a revolutionary procedure in the practice of pain management that can be used in the treatment of sacroiliac joint pain syndromes. It is a technology that uses radiofrequency needle probes to create lesions by way of localized tissue destruction. It is indicated for patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain who have had a positive response to a lateral branch block. This procedure typically provides at least 6 and up to 12 months of significant pain relief and can be repeated. Practitioners should be well versed in the different evolving methods for RFA as well as its evidence, relevant anatomy, the technology used in RFA, and the complications that may occur with this procedure and how to prevent them. This chapter explores these principles and presents the relevant findings from the literature for this innovative procedure for sacroiliac joint pain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Provenzano ◽  
Asokumar Buvanendran ◽  
Oscar A. de León-Casasola ◽  
Samer Narouze ◽  
Steven P. Cohen

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. P69
Author(s):  
P. Satija ◽  
M. Parker ◽  
M. Eckmann ◽  
S. Ramamurthy

PM&R ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 842-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve M. Aydin ◽  
Christopher G. Gharibo ◽  
Michael Mehnert ◽  
Todd P. Stitik

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. 489-496
Author(s):  
Samarjit Dey

Background: Sacroiliac joint dysfunctional pain has always been an enigma to the pain physician, whether it be the diagnosis or the treatment. Diagnostic blocks are the gold standard way to diagnose this condition. Radiofrequency neurotomy of the nerves supplying the sacroiliac joint has shown equivocal results due to anatomical variation. Intraarticular depo-steroid injection is a traditional approach to treating sacroiliac joint pain. For long-term pain relief, however, lesioning the sacral lateral branches may be a better approach. Objective: This study compared the efficacy of intraarticular depo-methylprednisolone injection to that of pulsed radiofrequency ablation for sacroiliac joint pain. Study Design: This study used a randomized, prospective design. Setting: Thirty patients with diagnostic block-confirmed sacroiliac joint dysfunctional pain were randomly assigned to 2 groups. One group received intraarticular methylprednisolone and another group underwent pulsed radiofrequency of the L4 medial branch, the L5 dorsal rami, and the lateral sacral branches. Results: Reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain at 1 month post-procedure remained similar in Group A, while in Group B few patients reported a further decrease in the NRS score (3.333 ± 0.4880 and 2.933 ± 0.5936, respectively). At 3 months post-procedure, the NRS score began to rise in most patients in group A, while in Group B, the NRS score remained the same since the last visit (4.400 ± 0.9856 and 3.067 ± 0.8837, respectively). At 6 months post-procedure, the NRS score began to rise further in most patients in group A. In Group B, the NRS score remained the same in most of the patients since the last visit (5.400 ± 1.549 and 3.200 ± 1.207). There was a marked difference between the 2 groups in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at 3 months post-procedure (Group A, 12.133 ± 4.486 vs Group B, 9.133 ± 3.523) and at 6 months post-procedure there was a significant (P = 0.0017) difference in ODI scores between Group A and Group B (13.067 ± 4.284 and 8.000 ± 3.703, respectively). Global Perceived Effect (GPE) was assessed in both groups at 3 months post-procedure Only 33.3% (Confidence Interval (CI) of 11.8- 61.6 ) of patients in Group A had positive GPE responses whereas in Group B, 86.67% (CI of 59.5- 98.3 ) of patients had positive GPE responses. At 6 months post-procedure, the proportion of patients with positive GPE declined further in Group A, while in Group B, positive GPE responses remained the same (20% with a CI of 4.30- 48.10 and 86.67% with a CI of 59.5- 98.3, respectively ). Limitations: Small sample size. Conclusion: This comparative study shows that pulsed radiofrequency denervation of the L4 and L5 primary dorsal rami and S1-3 lateral branches provide significant pain relief and functional improvement in patients with sacroiliac joint pain. Key words: Low back pain, sacroiliac joint dysfunctional pain, radiofrequency, intraarticular injection


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document