Open Lung Approach for the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Kacmarek ◽  
Jesús Villar ◽  
Demet Sulemanji ◽  
Raquel Montiel ◽  
Carlos Ferrando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Open Lung ◽  
Open Lung Approach

Physiological Effects of the Open Lung Approach in Patients with Early, Mild, Diffuse Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 1113-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilda Cinnella ◽  
Salvatore Grasso ◽  
Pasquale Raimondo ◽  
Davide D’Antini ◽  
Lucia Mirabella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Driving Pressure ◽  
Lung Mechanics ◽  
Positive End Expiratory Pressure ◽  
Open Lung ◽  
Open Lung Approach

Abstract Background To test the hypothesis that in early, mild, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients with diffuse loss of aeration, the application of the open lung approach (OLA) would improve homogeneity in lung aeration and lung mechanics, without affecting hemodynamics. Methods Patients were ventilated according to the ARDS Network protocol at baseline (pre-OLA). OLA consisted in a recruitment maneuver followed by a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure trial. Respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), cardiac index, and stroke volume variation were measured at baseline and 20 min after OLA implementation (post-OLA). Esophageal pressure was used for lung and chest wall elastance partitioning. The tomographic lung image obtained at the fifth intercostal space by EIT was divided in two ventral and two dorsal regions of interest (ROIventral and ROIDorsal). Results Fifteen consecutive patients were studied. The OLA increased arterial oxygen partial pressure/inspired oxygen fraction from 216 ± 13 to 311 ± 19 mmHg (P < 0.001) and decreased elastance of the respiratory system from 29.4 ± 3 cm H2O/l to 23.6 ± 1.7 cm H2O/l (P < 0.01). The driving pressure (airway opening plateau pressure − total positive end-expiratory pressure) decreased from 17.9 ± 1.5 cm H2O pre-OLA to 15.4 ± 2.1 post-OLA (P < 0.05). The tidal volume fraction reaching the dorsal ROIs increased, and consequently the ROIVentral/Dorsal impedance tidal variation decreased from 2.01 ± 0.36 to 1.19 ± 0.1 (P < 0.01). Conclusions The OLA decreases the driving pressure and improves the oxygenation and lung mechanics in patients with early, mild, diffuse ARDS. EIT is useful to assess the impact of OLA on regional tidal volume distribution.

The Open Lung Approach Improves Pulmonary Vascular Mechanics in an Experimental Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. e298-e305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnoldo Santos ◽  
Luca Lucchetta ◽  
M. Ignacio Monge-Garcia ◽  
Joao Batista Borges ◽  
Gerardo Tusman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Experimental Model ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Vascular Mechanics ◽  
Open Lung ◽  
Open Lung Approach

Acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes with distinct clinical outcomes in PHARLA trial cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-170
Author(s):  
Shailesh Bihari ◽  
◽  
Andrew Bersten ◽  
Eldho Paul ◽  
Shay McGuinness ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽  
Respiratory Distress ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Lung Ventilation ◽  
Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor ◽  
Open Lung ◽  
Inflammatory Phenotype ◽  
Parsimonious Model

Background: The Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure (PHARLAP) randomised controlled trial compared an open lung ventilation strategy with control ventilation, and found that open lung ventilation did not reduce the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) or mortality in patients with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Parsimonious models can identify distinct phenotypes of ARDS (hypo-inflammatory and hyperinflammatory) which are associated with different outcomes and treatment responses. Objective: To test the hypothesis that a parsimonious model would identify patients with distinctly different clinical outcomes in the PHARLAP study. Design, setting and participants: Blood and lung lavage samples were collected in a subset of PHARLAP patients who were recruited in Australian and New Zealand centres. A previously validated parsimonious model (interleukin-8, soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor-1 and bicarbonate) was used to classify patients with blood samples into hypo-inflammatory and hyperinflammatory groups. Generalised linear modelling was used to examine the interaction between inflammatory phenotype and treatment group (intervention or control). Main outcome measure: The primary outcome was number of VFDs at Day 28. Results: Data for the parsimonious model were available for 56 of 115 patients (49%). Within this subset, 38 patients (68%) and 18 patients (32%) were classified as having hypo-inflammatory and hyperinflammatory phenotypes, respectively. Patients with the hypo-inflammatory phenotype had more VFDs at Day 28 when compared with those with the hyperinflammatory phenotype (median [IQR], 19.5 [11–24] versus 8 [0–21]; P = 0.03). Patients with the hyperinflammatory phenotype had numerically fewer VFDs when managed with an open lung strategy than when managed with control “protective” ventilation (median [IQR], 0 [0–19] versus 16 [8–22]). Conclusion: In the PHARLAP trial, ARDS patients classified as having a hyperinflammatory phenotype, with a parsimonious three-variable model, had fewer VFDs at Day 28 compared with patients classified as having a hypo-inflammatory phenotype. Future clinical studies of ventilatory strategies should consider incorporating distinct ARDS phenotypes into their trial design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document