Measurement of Internal Radiation Exposure among Decontamination Workers in Villages near the Crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

2013 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaharu Tsubokura ◽  
Masahiko Nihei ◽  
Katsumi Sato ◽  
Shin Masaki ◽  
Yu Sakuma ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e0140482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junichi Akiyama ◽  
Shigeaki Kato ◽  
Masaharu Tsubokura ◽  
Jinichi Mori ◽  
Tetsuya Tanimoto ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (sp) ◽  
pp. 755-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kota Tomoyasu ◽  
◽  
Reo Kimura ◽  
Hitomi Mashima ◽  
Ikuno Kazama ◽  
...  

Although over three years have passed since the Great East Japan Earthquake, it is estimated that there remain approximately 135,000 evacuees from the nuclear power plant accident, 81,000 of whom had been living in areas under evacuation orders and 54,000 of whom had been living outside these areas (i.e., voluntary evacuees). However, the lived experience of such voluntary evacuees has been uncertain, as it is not possible to identify them. Consequently, it has not been possible to clarify the anxieties they harbor as they continue their extended existence as evacuees or to determine the issues they face in reconstructing their lives, making it difficult to extend suitable assistance measures. In this study, we worked with NHK to conduct a survey of voluntary evacuees. A list of interviewees compiled by NHK reporters was used to survey voluntary evacuees, who are difficult to identify. By analyzing the collected cases, we examined issues faced by “voluntary evacuees.” The results showed that the majority of the voluntary evacuees in this survey were mothers who had evacuated with their young children (but without their spouses) and who felt that they had had to evacuate due to anxieties about the effects of radiation exposure on their children’s growth. They tended to feel that it was difficult to return to their former areas of residence and that they had no choice except to continue living as evacuees. Furthermore, there were cases in which couples that had previously been living together had separated for reasons of work or place of occupation and had been forced into situations where they were obliged to economically support two households, with adverse effects on their budgets, minds, and bodies. In addition, the nuclear power plant accident made it difficult for them to decide where to base themselves in the future; in some cases, evacuees returned to their pre-disaster areas of residence only to evacuate again. Against the designation “voluntary,” the voluntary evacuees in this survey lived under circumstances in which they felt that they had had no choice but to evacuate; in enduring the difficulties of evacuation, they did not feel they had acted according to their voluntary will. This points to the need to implement effective assistance.


2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (10) ◽  
pp. E914-E923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kouji H. Harada ◽  
Tamon Niisoe ◽  
Mie Imanaka ◽  
Tomoyuki Takahashi ◽  
Katsumi Amako ◽  
...  

Radiation dose rates were evaluated in three areas neighboring a restricted area within a 20- to 50-km radius of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in August–September 2012 and projected to 2022 and 2062. Study participants wore personal dosimeters measuring external dose equivalents, almost entirely from deposited radionuclides (groundshine). External dose rate equivalents owing to the accident averaged 1.03, 2.75, and 1.66 mSv/y in the village of Kawauchi, the Tamano area of Soma, and the Haramachi area of Minamisoma, respectively. Internal dose rates estimated from dietary intake of radiocesium averaged 0.0058, 0.019, and 0.0088 mSv/y in Kawauchi, Tamano, and Haramachi, respectively. Dose rates from inhalation of resuspended radiocesium were lower than 0.001 mSv/y. In 2012, the average annual doses from radiocesium were close to the average background radiation exposure (2 mSv/y) in Japan. Accounting only for the physical decay of radiocesium, mean annual dose rates in 2022 were estimated as 0.31, 0.87, and 0.53 mSv/y in Kawauchi, Tamano, and Haramachi, respectively. The simple and conservative estimates are comparable with variations in the background dose, and unlikely to exceed the ordinary permissible dose rate (1 mSv/y) for the majority of the Fukushima population. Health risk assessment indicates that post-2012 doses will increase lifetime solid cancer, leukemia, and breast cancer incidences by 1.06%, 0.03% and 0.28% respectively, in Tamano. This assessment was derived from short-term observation with uncertainties and did not evaluate the first-year dose and radioiodine exposure. Nevertheless, this estimate provides perspective on the long-term radiation exposure levels in the three regions.


JAMA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 308 (7) ◽  
pp. 669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaharu Tsubokura ◽  
Stuart Gilmour ◽  
Kyohei Takahashi ◽  
Tomoyoshi Oikawa ◽  
Yukio Kanazawa

2015 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaharu Tsubokura ◽  
Shigeaki Kato ◽  
Shuhei Nomura ◽  
Tomohiro Morita ◽  
Amina Sugimoto ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e114407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makiko Orita ◽  
Naomi Hayashida ◽  
Hiroshi Nukui ◽  
Naoko Fukuda ◽  
Takashi Kudo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Naoi, MD ◽  
Akira Fujikawa, MD ◽  
Yukishige Kyoto, MD ◽  
Naoaki Kunishima, MD ◽  
Masahiro Ono, RT ◽  
...  

When the Great East Japan Earthquake occurred on March 11, 2011, the Ground Self-Defense Force (GSDF) was dispatched nationally to Northeast area in Japan. The highly trained GSDF members were simultaneously assigned to various missions for the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants disaster. The missions of GSDF terminated on August 31, 2011. Special medical examinations were conducted for the members as they returned to each military unit. GSDF members who were assigned to the nuclear power plant were at risk of radiation exposure; therefore, pocket dosimeters were used to assess external radiation exposure. A few months after the mission was terminated, measurements of internal radiation exposure were performed. This is the first report of the internal exposure of GSDF members who worked in the restricted radiation contamination area. Here, we report the amounts of internal and external exposure of and the equipment used by the GSDF members.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document