Preoperatively Assessable Clinical and Pathological Risk Factors for Parametrial Involvement in Surgically Treated FIGO Stage IB–IIA Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1722-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emel Canaz ◽  
Eser Sefik Ozyurek ◽  
Baki Erdem ◽  
Merve Aldikactioglu Talmac ◽  
Ipek Yildiz Ozaydin ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Yamazaki ◽  
Yukiharu Todo ◽  
Kazuhira Okamoto ◽  
Katsushige Yamashiro ◽  
Hidenori Kato

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S717-S717
Author(s):  
S. Ryu ◽  
S. Park ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
B. Kim ◽  
M. Kim ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1027-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.-B. Lee ◽  
J.-M. Lee ◽  
K.-D. Ki ◽  
S.-K. Lee ◽  
C.-Y. Park ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of chemotherapy or radiation as adjuvant therapy for patients with FIGO stage IB–IIA cervical cancer and surgically confirmed intermediate risk factors. Data were collected from patients with uterine cervical cancer FIGO stage IB–IIA who had adjuvant chemotherapy following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (RHLND, cases) or adjuvant radiotherapy following RHLND (controls). The study groups consisted of 38 cases and 42 controls. Adjuvant treatment was given to the patients with a combination of intermediate risk factors including deep stromal invasion (>50%), lymphvascular space invasion, large tumor size (3–6 cm), or close vaginal resection margin (<1 cm). Comparison of the cases with the controls revealed no significant differences in variables studied including median age (P= 0.18), stage distribution (P= 0.30), histologic subtype (P= 0.93), pathologic tumor size (P= 0.46), depth of the stromal invasion (P= 0.29), lymphvascular space invasion (P= 0.50), and close vaginal resection margin (P= 0.62). The difference in disease-free survival rates was not significant (P= 0.68). However, the overall survival analysis was incomplete due to the limited number of events available at the end of the study period. The findings of this study suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB–IIA uterine cervical cancer and surgically confirmed intermediate risk factors may be effective.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taner Turan ◽  
Burcu Aykan Yildirim ◽  
Gokhan Tulunay ◽  
Nurettin Boran ◽  
Mehmet Faruk Kose

2011 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. S113
Author(s):  
K. Lee ◽  
S. Lim ◽  
S. Cheon ◽  
S. Park ◽  
C. Park

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
E. Pereira ◽  
N. Nair ◽  
M.A. Schwartz ◽  
J. Gorski ◽  
P. Dottino ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1086-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Li ◽  
Ashwin Shinde ◽  
Ernest Han ◽  
Stephen Lee ◽  
Sushil Beriwal ◽  
...  

BackgroundRandomized trials describe differing sets of high–intermediate risk criteria.ObjectiveTo use the National Cancer Database to compare the impact of radiation therapy in patients with stage I endometrial cancer meeting different criteria, and define a classification of “unfavorable risk.”MethodsPatients with stage I endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database and stratified into two cohorts: (1) patients meeting Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-99 criteria only for high–intermediate risk, but not Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC)-1 criteria and (2) those meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. High-risk stage I patients with both FIGO stage IB (under FIGO 2009 staging) and grade 3 disease were excluded. In each cohort, propensity score-matched survival analyses were performed. Based on these analyses, we propose a new classification of unfavorable risk. We then analyzed the association of adjuvant radiation with survival, stratified by this classification.ResultsWe identified 117,272 patients with stage I endometrial cancer. Of these, 11,207 patients met GOG-99 criteria only and 5,920 patients met PORTEC-1 criteria only. After propensity score matching, adjuvant radiation therapy improved survival (HR=0.73; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89; p=0.002) in the GOG-99 only cohort. However, there was no benefit of adjuvant radiation (HR=0.89; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.14; p=0.355) in the PORTEC-1 only cohort. We, therefore, defined unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer as two or more of the following risk factors: lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2–3 disease, and FIGO stage IB. Adjuvant radiation improved survival in stage I patients with adverse risk factors (HR=0.74; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.80; p<0.001), but not in other stage I patients (HR=1.02; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; p=0.710; p interaction <0.001).ConclusionOur study showed that adjuvant radiation was associated with an overall survival benefit in patients meeting GOG-99 criteria only; however, no survival benefit was seen in patients meeting PORTEC-1 criteria only. We propose a definition of unfavorable risk stage I endometrial cancer: ≥2 risk factors from among lymphovascular invasion, age ≥70, grade 2–3 disease, and FIGO stage IB disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document