A Novel Surgical Technique for the Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Gusher Encountered During Cochlear Implantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. e1177
Author(s):  
Anthony M. Tolisano ◽  
Cameron C. Wick ◽  
Joe Walter Kutz
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Eftekharian ◽  
Maryam Amizadeh

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 727-732
Author(s):  
Kazuaki Kawagishi ◽  
Harukazu Hiraumi ◽  
Kirito Shimamoto ◽  
Tomoko Mizukawa ◽  
Hiroaki Sato

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Filipo ◽  
Edoardo Covelli ◽  
Chiara D'elia ◽  
Patrizia Mancini

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mohamed Mehanna ◽  
MohamedFawzi Fathala ◽  
MohamedSamy Elwany

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Bianchin ◽  
Valeria Polizzi ◽  
Patrizia Formigoni ◽  
Carmela Russo ◽  
Lorenzo Tribi

Objective. To share our experience of cerebrospinal fluid gusher in cochlear implantation in patients with enlarged cochlear or vestibular aqueduct.Study Design. Case series with comparison and a review of the literature.Methods. A retrospective study was performed.Demographic and radiological results of patients with enlarged cochlear aqueduct or enlarged vestibular aqueduct in 278 consecutive cochlear implant recipients, including children and adults, were evaluated between January 2000 and December 2015.Results. Six patients with enlarged cochlear aqueduct and eight patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct were identified. Cerebrospinal fluid gusher occurs in five subjects with enlarged cochlear aqueduct and in only one case of enlarged vestibular aqueduct.Conclusion. Based on these findings, enlarged cochlear aqueduct may be the best risk predictor of cerebrospinal fluid gusher at cochleostomy during cochlear implant surgery despite enlarged vestibular aqueduct.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leise Elisabeth Hviid Korsager ◽  
Jesper Hvass Schmidt ◽  
Christian Faber ◽  
Jens Højberg Wanscher

2011 ◽  
Vol 120 (8) ◽  
pp. 529-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Jia ◽  
Frédéric Venail ◽  
Jean-Pierre Piron ◽  
Charlène Batrel ◽  
Pierfrancesco Pelliccia ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (v1supplement) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas D. Backous

The indications for cochlear implantation continue to extend to patients with increased levels of residual hearing. Single-sided deafness and tinnitus are currently under various clinical trials as even further expansion of the application of cochlear implant device and programming technology is underway. This video details a round window and hearing preservation approach for cochlear implant placement, and incorporates the most recent advances in surgical technique.The video can be found here: http://youtu.be/bDqkbboXrU4.


2018 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 007-010
Author(s):  
Milind Kirtane ◽  
Kashmira Chavan

Abstract Introduction Different surgical approaches have been adopted for cochlear implantation, with cortical mastoidectomy–posterior tympanotomy being the most commonly followed technique. Method In this article, we describe the surgical technique for cochlear implant followed at our center, which has been successfully implemented in more than 2,500 cochlear implant surgeries. Cochlear implant surgery using the cortical mastoidectomy–posterior tympanotomy technique has been performed in more than 2,500 cases with some modifications to the original technique over a period of time. Results In spite of not using tie-down holes and securing down the receiver–stimulator with sutures, no cases of receiver–stimulator displacement or outward electrode migration have been noted with the current technique of creating a snug-fitting subperiosteal pocket along with a hook for the electrode array. Conclusion Adhering to a strict intraoperative surgical protocol plays an extremely important role in carrying out successful cochlear implant surgeries with minimal complications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document