scholarly journals Comparison of dexamethasone intravitreal implant with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (22) ◽  
pp. e15798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaibao Ji ◽  
Qinglin Zhang ◽  
Man Tian ◽  
Yiqiao Xing
2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212094759
Author(s):  
Raymond Pranata ◽  
Amelinda Vania ◽  
Rachel Vania ◽  
Andi Arus Victor

Purpose: Intravitreal ranibizumab (RNB) and dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DII) were developed in the recent past and has been widely used for macular edema secondary to BRVO. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (RNB) compared to dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DII) in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: We performed a comprehensive search on topics that assess RNB and DII in patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO from several electronic databases. Results: There were 678 subjects from five studies. Ranibizumab was associated with a greater increase in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; mean difference 9.13, I2: 0%) compared to DII. Ranibizumab also demonstrated a greater ⩾10 (OR 2.76, I2: 0%) and ⩾15 letters (OR 2.78, I2: 0%) gain. RNB has better BCVA (logMAR scale) improvement at 6 months’ follow up (mean difference −0.15, I2: 64%) in favor of RNB. Higher IOP was found in DII group on follow-up (mean difference −2.92, I2: 89%) and RNB has lesser IOP ⩾10 mmHg increase compared to DII (OR 0.08, I2: 0%). Cataract formation and/or progression was less in RNB (OR 0.53, I2: 75%). The need for rescue laser was similar the two groups. Conclusion: Intravitreal RNB was more effective with less pronounced effect on IOP and cataract formation and/or progression compared to DII for patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Te Huang ◽  
Chun-Ju Lin ◽  
Huan-Sheng Chen ◽  
Peng-Tai Tien ◽  
Chun-Ting Lai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study evaluated the effects of dexamethasone intravitreal implant on treatment-naïve branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)-induced macular edema (ME), and the risk factors for earlier repeated treatment. Methods Patients treated from 2013 to 2016 were enrolled. The patients’ demographics, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central retinal thickness (CRT) were recorded. Risk factors for repeated treatment were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model and logistic regression. Results 29 patients (mean age: 58.64 ± 13.3 years) were included; 44.8% received only one injection, while 55.2% received two or more. The mean initial CRT was 457.8 ± 167.1 μm; the peak CRT and final CRT improved significantly to 248.9 ± 57.9 μm and 329.2 ± 115.1 μm, respectively. The peak BCVA improvement and final improvement were 29.5 ± 23.5 approximate ETDRS letters and 19.8 ± 24.4 letters, respectively, with 62.1% of patients improving by more than 15 letters. Older age, higher initial CRT, and diabetes were the risk factors for multiple injections. Conclusion Dexamethasone intravitreal implant results in significant peak CRT and BCVA improvements, while older age, higher initial CRT, and diabetes are risk factors for repeated injections. The optimal retreatment schedule for these patients should be further explored.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-237
Author(s):  
Michael Singer ◽  
Darren Bell ◽  
Joshua Singer ◽  
Paul Woods ◽  
Tyson R. Jergensen ◽  
...  

Background and Objective: Sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant is an effective treatment for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) but ocular hypertension is a side effect. This study evaluated whether the addition of a single combination IOP-lowering medication will reliably control intraocular pressure (IOP) for those patients.   Study Design/Patients and Methods: Retrospective chart review of 62 patients that underwent multiple injections of combination anti-VEGF and sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant for macular edema secondary to RVO. IOP spikes were treated with brimonidine 0.2% - timolol 0.5%. IRB approval was obtained.   Results: The average elevated IOP requiring treatment was 28.6 mmHg. The average IOP after adding brimonidine 0.2% - timolol 0.5% was 16.7 mmHg. 100 percent of treatment cycles had an IOP< 30 mmHg after starting treatment.   Conclusions: Using one combination IOP-lowering drop can reliably control the ocular hypertension that occurs secondary to combination therapy for macular edema in RVO.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document