scholarly journals Can intraoperative ultrasound visualize the closed reduction and elastic intramedullary nail fixation processes of double forearm fractures in children?

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (12) ◽  
pp. e24324
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Yang ◽  
Lang Li ◽  
Xueyang Tang ◽  
Bo Xiang ◽  
Tianfu Wen
Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Ovidiu Adam ◽  
Vlad Laurentiu David ◽  
Florin George Horhat ◽  
Eugen Sorin Boia

Background and objectives: There are various methods in the management of forearm fractures in children. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing using Titanium Elastic Nail (TEN) is nowadays employed in diaphysis fractures of children, with clear benefits over other treatment options. However, in the case of TEN versus other treatment methods of forearm fractures in children, cost is an important issue. This report will focus on the cost assessment of using TEN versus other therapeutic means in the treatment of forearm fractures in children. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective longitudinal study of 173 consecutive patients with forearm fractures treated in a single institution during 2017. We calculated the cost for each patient by summing up direct costs plus indirect costs, calculated at an aggregate level. Hospital income data were extracted from the Diagnosis Related Groups database. Results: A total of 173 patients with forearm fractures were treated, 44 using TEN, 86 using K-wire, and 46 using closed reduction and cast. There were 66 radius fractures, 1 ulna fracture, and 106 that were both radius and ulna fractures. Mean treatment cost were $632.76 for TEN, $499.50 for K-wire, and $451.30 for closed reduction and cast. Costs for TEN were higher than for K-wire insertion (p = 0.00) and higher than closed reduction and cast ($182.42; p = 0.00). Reimbursement per patient was higher with TEN versus K-wire patients; $497.88 vs. $364.64 /patient (p = 0.00), and higher than for patients treated with closed reduction and cast (p = 0.00). Conclusions: The treatment of upper extremity fractures using TEN was more expensive than the other methods. In Romania, because the reimbursement for TEN is higher as well, there are no differences in the financial burden when treating forearm fractures with TEN versus K-wire. Non-surgical treatment has the lowest cost but also the lowest reimbursement.


1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Voto ◽  
Dennis S. Weiner ◽  
Bonnie Leighley

Author(s):  
Alamgir Jhan ◽  
Wazir Fahad Jan ◽  
Ganesh Singh Dharamshaktu ◽  
Tajinder Bhalla ◽  
Saika Rasool ◽  
...  

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> There is a recent trend towards elastic intramedullary nailing in fixation of pediatric forearm bone diaphyseal fractures. But in children we should always attempt closed reduction and immobilsation in a moulded plaster cast. Irreducible, open fractures and those that get redisplaced in moulded plaster cast need operative fixation with intramedullary nailing. Our aim was to know the outcome of tens nailing in such fractures.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> We studied functional and radiological outcome of elastic intramedullary nailing by pin leverage technique in forearm fractures in 34 children. The study was done at a tertiary care centre in Uttrakhand, India from May, 2016 to July, 2018. Inclusion criteria were closed forearm fractures; diaphyseal fractures; age 1 to 19 years. Exclusion criteria were open type 2 and type 3 Gustillo-Anderson fractures; metaphyseal, epiphyseal forearm fractures; age &gt;19 years; pathological fractures.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Closed reduction and percutaneous pin leverage technique for reduction was successful in all but 4 patients where limited open reduction was used for reduction of fracture fragments. All fractures united radiologically between 7 to 13 weeks with mean distribution of 9.2 weeks. For functional outcome we used modified Price and Daruwala’s score. 28 patients showed excellent results and 6 patients showed good results. All our patients had radiological union in mean of 9.2 weeks (7-13 weeks).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Fixation with intramedullary TENS nailing is an effective and affordable way of treating patients in paediatric age group.</p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Janis Upenieks ◽  
Sintija Sloka ◽  
Aigars Petersons ◽  
Anita Villerusa

SummaryIntroduction.Forearm fractures make up a significant part of overall fracture rate in pediatric population, especially in 7-15 years old children. Different methods of treatment have been used, depending on the age of children and type and localization of fracture. Most controversies can be seen among conservative and surgical methods of treatment.Aim of the Study.The aim of our study is to identify common localizations and types of forearm bone fractures in pediatric population, as well as analyze patient data and treatment process depending on selected method of treatment for out-patients and in-patients.Materials and Methods.Retrospective analysis of out-patient and in-patient records, treated in University Children’s hospital from 2007 to 2011 was made, including first time patients with fractures of one or both forearm bones, according to ICD-10 codes S52.0- S52.9. Demographical data, trauma mechanisms, localization and type of fracture, as well as applied treatment and stay length at hospital were analyzed. 1742 out-patients and 1029 in-patients, 7-15 years old at the moment of trauma, were included in this research.Results.2771 forearm fractures were registered, 62.9% patients were treated on out-patient basis, 37.1 % patients required treatment in hospital. Forearm bone fractures were gender specific - 2235 boys and 536 girls had to be treated (Male:Female ratio was 4.2 : 1). The peak incidence was seen in 13 years old boys and girls. Boys suffered from forearm fractures more often in any age group. Most common mechanisms of injuries causing forearm fractures in children were related with sports trainings - 22.1%, skiing - 15.0% and traffic injuries - 10.0%. Most common activities at the moment of trauma differ by season - during winter months they include skiing, skating and sledging while in summer falls from height, bicycles and swings are dominant. Several trauma mechanisms, like sport trainings, are not season-dependent. Some injury mechanisms differ significantly by gender. Boys were more often as girls injured during sports trainings and skiing, while girls experience forearm fractures due to bicycling and skating. Occurrence of forearm fractures in children has seasonal differences with two peaks: from June to August and from December to February. Distal forearm fractures are the most often seen localization of overall forearm fractures (42 % in boys and 36 % in girls). In out-patients group conservative treatment was performed - plaster immobilization in 1339 cases and closed reduction, followed by plaster immobilization in 403 cases. In-patients were treated both - conservatively with immobilization in 21 cases and closed reduction in 188 cases, and surgically with K-wire osteosynthesis in 137 cases or elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) in 683 cases. The type and localization of each fracture, along with the age of patient, are the key factors for choosing the right treatment method. K-wire osteosynthesis was performed in all age groups for unstable fractures in distal or proximal third of forearm. ESIN was a method of choice for unstable or comminuted midshaft fractures of one or both bones, metadiaphyseal fractures and some specific conditions (radial neck fractures, Monteggia fractures-dislocations), especially in older patients. Stay length at hospital was ranging from 1 to 2 hospital days in case of immobilization (mean = 1,05 days), from 1 to 4 days in closed reduction group (mean = 1,32 days), but 1 to 12 days in hospital spent children after K-wire osteosynthesis (mean = 1,99 days) or ESIN (mean = 2,38 days).Conclusions.1. Forearm fractures in children have a significant gender diversity (M : F ratio is 4,2 : 1).2. Peak incidence group is 13 years old adolescents of both genders.3. Seasonality and season-specific injury patterns are typical for pediatric forearm fractures.4. The most common anatomic localization is the distal segment of forearm bones.5. Younger children (7-9 years) are mainly treated by conservative methods, while methods of choice for treatment of forearm fractures in adolescents (13-15 years) are operative.6. Surgical treatment of fractures do not significantly increase stay length at hospital.


1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Voto ◽  
Dennis S. Weiner ◽  
Bonnie Leighley

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 635
Author(s):  
Florian Freislederer ◽  
Susanne Bensler ◽  
Thomas Specht ◽  
Olaf Magerkurth ◽  
Karim Eid

Background: Recommended treatment for severely displaced proximal humeral fractures in children is the closed reduction and percutaneous fixation by K-wires or intramedullary nailing. Methods: From January 2016 to January 2017 6, 21 children/adolescents (range 8 to 16 years) with proximal humeral fractures were treated surgically for severe displacement. In these six patients, several attempts of closed reduction were unsuccessful, and an open reduction was performed. The humeral head was fixed with a 3.5 mm T-plate without affecting the growth plate. Plate removal was performed at a mean interval of 132 days after initial surgery. Two years after initial surgery, the clinical outcome was assessed by the Constant–Murley score and QuickDASH score (including sport/music and work) and the shoulder joint was evaluated with a standardized sonographic examination for the rotator cuff and the conjoint tendon. Results: In all six patients, dorsal displacement of the fracture was irreducible due to the interposition of tendinous or osseous structures. Intraoperatively, the interposed structures were the long biceps tendon in two, periosteal tissue in two, a bony fragment in one, and the long biceps tendon together with the conjoint tendon in one case. At mean follow-up of 26 months (range 22 months to 29 months), patients showed very good clinical results with an excellent mean Constant–Murley score of 97.5 (range 91 to 100) and mean QuickDASH score (including sport/music and work) of 5.5 (range 0–20.8). An X-ray follow-up 6 weeks after surgery demonstrated early consolidation and correct alignment in all patients. A sonographic evaluation at 2 years post injury showed that the biceps and the conjoined tendon were intact in all patients. Conclusions: If a proximal humeral fracture is not reducible by closed means, a tissue entrapment (most likely biceps tendon) should be considered. Treatment with an open reduction and plate fixation yields very good clinical and radiological results and preserves interposed structures as the biceps and conjoint tendon.


2021 ◽  
pp. 194338752199028
Author(s):  
José Henrique Santana Quinto ◽  
Andressa Bolognesi Bachesk ◽  
Lucas Costa Nogueira ◽  
Liogi Iwaki Filho

The prevalence of dentoalveolar injuries in children is approximately 25%, with falls from own height being one of the main etiologies. Diagnosis is based on the clinical evaluation associated with complementary imaging tests. The treatment of choice depends on the type of damage and structure affected. For alveolar process fractures, closed reduction and semi-rigid dental splinting for 4 to 6 weeks is generally satisfactory. However, some cases, such as severe segmental fractures, require open treatment to ensure adequate reduction and stabilization of the displaced alveolar segment, which is usually achieved by titanium miniplates and screws. Nevertheless, there are situations where this type of fixation is not possible, requiring alternative methods. Therefore, this article describes a surgical technique performed by open reduction, associating semi-rigid dental splint and circummandibular wiring in pediatric patient diagnosed with dentoalveolar fracture through clinical examination (with bone fracture displacement) and tomography. The technique promoted a good prognostic to the patient, proving to be a viable alternative for treating dentoalveolar fractures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document