An Optimistic Look at the New Home Health Payment Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-177
Author(s):  
E. Liza Greenberg
Author(s):  
David C. Grabowski ◽  
David G. Stevenson ◽  
Haiden A. Huskamp ◽  
Nancy L. Keating

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Fout ◽  
Michael Plotzke ◽  
Thomas Christian

A criticism of Medicare’s home health prospective payment system is its partial reliance on cost-based reimbursement of therapy services provided by home health agencies (HHAs) to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, potentially overincentivizing the provision of therapy services. Using Medicare FFS home health claims and assessment data, we estimated a model to predict therapy use as a proxy for clinical need and replace actual therapy use with the prediction in the home health payment system. We estimated a $1.178 billion (95% confidence interval, $1.171-$1.184) decrease in home health payments relative to levels under the current system. The majority of the decrease was due to the model predicting fewer high therapy episodes than actually occurred. It may therefore be more appropriate to predict both therapy and nontherapy use, requiring an overhaul of the current system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 260-260
Author(s):  
Julia Burgdorf ◽  
Jennifer Wolff

Abstract Older adults with cognitive impairment have unique care needs that often lead to greater levels of health care utilization. Prior work suggests that older adults with cognitive impairment access home health care at higher rates; yet, recent Medicare home health payment system revisions exclude patient cognitive status when determining risk adjustment. This research examines the relationship between patient cognitive status and resource utilization during Medicare home health care. We examine 1,217 (weighted n=2,134,620) community-dwelling older adults who received Medicare-funded home health between 2011-2016, using linked nationally representative survey data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), home health patient assessment data, Medicare claims data, and Medicare Provider of Services files. We use weighted, multivariable negative binomial regressions to model the relationship between patient dementia status and the expected number of total visits and number of each visit type (nursing, therapy, and aide) during home health. Models adjusted for patient sociodemographic characteristics and health and functional status during home health, as well as home health provider characteristics. Among Medicare home health patients, the presence of cognitive impairment during home health is associated with 2.87 additional total visits (p<0.001), 1.27 additional nursing visits (p<0.01), and 1.23 additional therapy visits (p=0.04) during the home health episode. Findings suggest that recent revisions to the Medicare home health payment system may disincentivize home health care for older adults with dementia and/or financially penalize home health providers whose patient populations have a greater dementia burden.


1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-262
Author(s):  
Jason Marks
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-261
Author(s):  
Penny Hollander Feldman ◽  
Christopher M. Murtaugh

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-262
Author(s):  
J. Marks
Keyword(s):  

ASHA Leader ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 24-25
Author(s):  
Sarah Warren
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa Lee ◽  
Melissa O’Connor

In November 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services published a report commissioned from Abt Associates titled “Medicare Home Health Prospective Payment System: Case-Mix Methodology Refinements, Overview of the Home Health Groupings Model.” The report presents a proposal to dramatically change Medicare payment for home health care. Based on Medicare claims and home health patient assessment data from 2013, the proposal and its approach raise issues and questions about whether historical practice patterns in home health care provide optimal grounding for a redesign of the home health payment system of the future.


2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 946-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Rosati ◽  
David Russell ◽  
Timothy Peng ◽  
Carlin Brickner ◽  
Daniel Kurowski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 188-188
Author(s):  
Julia Burgdorf ◽  
Kathy Bowles

Abstract Medicare beneficiaries with cognitive impairment are more likely to access home health care than those without such impairment, and an estimated 1 in 3 Medicare home health patients has diagnosed dementia. However, recent changes to the Medicare home health payment system do not adjust for patients’ cognitive impairment. To the extent that cognitive impairment prompts higher intensity care, this could create a financial disincentive for providers serving this patient population. We draw on a nationally representative sample of 1,214 (weighted n=5,856,333) community-living Medicare beneficiaries who received home health care between 2011-2016. We measure care intensity by the number and type of visits received during an index home health care episode. We model care intensity as a function of patient cognitive impairment during the episode, measured via clinician reports in standardized patient assessment data. In propensity score adjusted, multivariable models holding all covariates at their means, home health patients with identified cognitive impairment received a significantly greater number of visits. During the index home health episode, cognitively impaired patients received an additional 2.82 total visits (95% CI: 1.32-4.31; p<0.001), 1.39 nursing visits (95% CI: 0.49-2.29; p=0.003), 0.72 physical therapy visits (95% CI: 0.06-1.39; p=0.03), and 0.60 occupational therapy visits (95% CI: 0.15-1.05; p=0.01). Findings suggest that recent changes to Medicare home health care reimbursement do not reflect the more intensive care needs of patients with cognitive impairment, and may threaten access to care for these individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document