Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction in Immediate Single-Stage versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 1e-8e ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas M. Susarla ◽  
Ingrid Ganske ◽  
Lydia Helliwell ◽  
Donald Morris ◽  
Elof Eriksson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Stage Versus ◽  
Two Stage

Risk of Malocclusion Among Patients Undergoing Single-Stage Versus Two-Stage Cleft Palate Repair

2022 ◽  
pp. 105566562110449
Author(s):  
Hilary McCrary ◽  
Vanessa Torrecillas ◽  
Sarah Hatch Pollard ◽  
Dave S. Collingridge ◽  
Duane Yamashiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Stage Versus ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
Palate Repair

Objective Evaluate impact of single-stage versus staged palate repair on the risk of developing malocclusion among patients with cleft palate (CP). Design Retrospective cohort study 2000–2016 Setting Academic, tertiary children’s hospital. Patients Patients undergoing CP repair between 1999–2015. Interventions CP repair, categorized as either single-stage or staged. Main Outcome Measure Time to development of Class III malocclusion. Results 967 patients were included; 60.1% had a two-stage CP repair, and 39.9% had single-stage. Malocclusion was diagnosed in 28.2% of patients. In the model examining all patients at ≤5 years ( n = 659), patients who were not white had a higher risk of malocclusion (HR 2.46, p = 0.004) and staged repair was not protective against malocclusion (HR 0.98, p = 0.91). In all patients >5 years ( n = 411), higher Veau classification and more recent year of birth were significantly associated with higher hazard rates ( p < 0.05). Two-staged repair was not protective against developing malocclusion (HR 0.86, p = 0.60). In the model examining patients with staged repair ≤5 years old ( n = 414), higher age at hard palate closure was associated with reduced malocclusion risk (HR 0.67, p < 0.001) and patients who were not white had increased risk (HR 2.56, p = 0.01). In patients with staged repair >5 years old, more recent birth year may be associated with a higher risk of malocclusion (HR 1.06, p = 0.06) while syndrome may be associated with lower risk of malocclusion diagnosis (HR 0.46, p = 0.07). Conclusion Our data suggests that staged CP repair is not protective against developing Class III malocclusion.

Patient satisfaction and complication rate after mastectomy with immediate two-stage breast reconstruction as compared to mastectomy without immediate breast reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 120-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timme M.A.J. van Vuuren ◽  
Elizabeth R.M. van Haaren ◽  
Theo J. vd Kar ◽  
Johannes W. Kortleve ◽  
Clarissa I.E. Scheeren
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Immediate Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Two Stage

scholarly journals Abstract 58. Single-Stage versus Two-Stage Arteriovenous Loop Microsurgical Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 51-52
Author(s):  
Rebecca Knackstedt ◽  
Rachel Aliotta ◽  
Risal Djohan ◽  
Brian Gastman ◽  
Graham Schwarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Stage ◽  
Stage Versus ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Microsurgical Reconstruction ◽  
Arteriovenous Loop

Single-Stage versus Two-Stage Bilateral Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Patients with Bilateral Femur Fractures, A Multicenter Retrospective Review

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilexa R Flagstad ◽  
Lauren M Tatman ◽  
Austin Heare ◽  
Harsh R Parikh ◽  
Melissa Albersheim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intramedullary Nail ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Stage Versus ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Multicenter Retrospective Review
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document