Changing Characteristics of Facial Fractures Treated at a Regional, Level 1 Trauma Center, From 2005 to 2010

2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 461-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine S. Roden ◽  
Winnie Tong ◽  
Matthew Surrusco ◽  
William W. Shockley ◽  
John A. Van Aalst ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (7) ◽  
pp. 1408-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian C. Hoppe ◽  
Anthony M. Kordahi ◽  
Angie M. Paik ◽  
Edward S. Lee ◽  
Mark S. Granick

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. e15-e16
Author(s):  
R. Garza ◽  
J.M. Adkinson ◽  
J.N. Gilstrap ◽  
N.F. Miller ◽  
S.M. Eid ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Kim ◽  
Nicholas Ottaiano ◽  
Francisco Brito ◽  
Bradley Spieler ◽  
Crawford Dixon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sallie Long ◽  
Daniel B. Spielman ◽  
Tasher Losenegger ◽  
Adetokunbo A. Obayemi ◽  
Romy Neuner ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1825-1828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian C. Hoppe ◽  
Anthony M. Kordahi ◽  
Angie M. Paik ◽  
Edward S. Lee ◽  
Mark S. Granick

2020 ◽  
Vol 252 ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
Amanda Fazzalari ◽  
David Alfego ◽  
J. Taylor Shortsleeve ◽  
Qiming Shi ◽  
Jomol Mathew ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110474
Author(s):  
Brett M. Tracy ◽  
Amy K. Whitson ◽  
JC Chen ◽  
Brian D. Weiss ◽  
Carrie A. Sims

Introduction There is a growing concern that certain public health restrictions imposed to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could result in more violence against women (VAW). We sought to determine if the rates and types of VAW changed during the COVID-19 pandemic at our level 1 trauma center (L1TC). Methods We performed a retrospective review of female patients who presented to our L1TC because of violence from 2019 through 2020. Patients were grouped into a pre-COVID or COVID period. The primary aim of this study was to compare rates of VAW between groups. Secondary aims sought to evaluate for any difference in traumatic mechanism between periods and to determine if a temporal relationship existed between COVID-19 and VAW rates. Results There was no difference in rates of VAW between the pre-COVID and COVID period (3.1% vs 3.6%, P = .6); however, rates of penetrating trauma were greater during the COVID period (38.2% vs 10.3%, P = .01). After controlling for patient age and race, the odds of penetrating trauma increased during the pandemic (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.6-28.5, P < .01). From February 2020 through October 2020, there was a direct relationship between rates of COVID-19 and VAW ( r2 .78, P < .01). Conclusion Rates of VAW were unchanged between the pre-COVID and COVID periods, yet the odds of penetrating VAW were 5 times greater during the pandemic. Moving forward, trauma surgeons must remain vigilant for signs of violence and ensure that support services are available during future crises.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie A. Sewalt ◽  
Benjamin Y. Gravesteijn ◽  
Daan Nieboer ◽  
Ewout W. Steyerberg ◽  
Dennis Den Hartog ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prehospital triage protocols typically try to select patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) above 15 for direct transportation to a Level-1 trauma center. However, ISS does not necessarily discriminate between patients who benefit from immediate care at Level-1 trauma centers. The aim of this study was to assess which patients benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers. Methods We used the American National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), a retrospective observational cohort. All adult patients (ISS > 3) between 2015 and 2016 were included. Patients who were self-presenting or had isolated limb injury were excluded. We used logistic regression to assess the association of direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers with in-hospital mortality adjusted for clinically relevant confounders. We used this model to define benefit as predicted probability of mortality associated with transportation to a non-Level-1 trauma center minus predicted probability associated with transportation to a Level-1 trauma center. We used a threshold of 1% as absolute benefit. Potential interaction terms with transportation to Level-1 trauma centers were included in a penalized logistic regression model to study which patients benefit. Results We included 388,845 trauma patients from 232 Level-1 centers and 429 Level-2/3 centers. A small beneficial effect was found for direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers (adjusted Odds Ratio: 0.96, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.92–0.99) which disappeared when comparing Level-1 and 2 versus Level-3 trauma centers. In the risk approach, predicted benefit ranged between 0 and 1%. When allowing for interactions, 7% of the patients (n = 27,753) had more than 1% absolute benefit from direct transportation to Level-1 trauma centers. These patients had higher AIS Head and Thorax scores, lower GCS and lower SBP. A quarter of the patients with ISS > 15 were predicted to benefit from transportation to Level-1 centers (n = 26,522, 22%). Conclusions Benefit of transportation to a Level-1 trauma centers is quite heterogeneous across patients and the difference between Level-1 and Level-2 trauma centers is small. In particular, patients with head injury and signs of shock may benefit from care in a Level-1 trauma center. Future prehospital triage models should incorporate more complete risk profiles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document