scholarly journals Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II–III Triple Negative Breast Cancer on Eligibility for Breast-conserving Surgery and Breast Conservation Rates

2015 ◽  
Vol 262 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehra Golshan ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
William M. Sikov ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Sara Jasinski ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12081-e12081
Author(s):  
Alexander Philipovskiy ◽  
Javier Chavez Corral ◽  
Rosalinda Heydarian ◽  
Alok Kumar Dwivedi ◽  
Gong Xiaoming ◽  
...  

e12081 Background: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in Hispanic/Latino (H/L) women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 104 records of female patients diagnosed with TNBC, stages I–III, treated at Texas Tech Breast Care Center from 2006 to 2016. Pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and compared between two treatment groups. Kaplan Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to determine unadjusted and adjusted effects of NACT compared to ACT. Results: Of 104 TNBC patients with median duration of follow up of 6 (range 2-11) years, 30 (29%) received NACT and 74 (71%) received ACT. Women undergoing NACT were mostly younger, with a mean age of 50.8 (range 40-67) years, compared with those in the ACT group, mean age of 53 (range 32-80) years. Additionally, women in the NACT group had more advanced cancer, stage III (61%) and stage II (33%), in contrast to the ACT group, who had stage III (23%) and stage II (55%). Of 30 patients received NACT,twelve (40%) had pCR. The (median 6 years/range 2-11 years Women who achieved pCR had better PFS and OS compared with patients who received ACT. On the other hand, women with residual cancer after NACT had worse survival outcomes compared with women who received ACT (Hazards Ratio-HR = 0.1, p = 0.001). Conclusions: In our study, we observed that the patients in the NACT group with residual cancer had statistically significantly worse survival outcomes compared with ACT group. Patients who received NACT and had pCR had no relapse over the observation period. Our study suggests that there is a need of a prospective study to better understand the biology of TNBC among H/L women in order to individualized NACT to population of patients with “chemosensitive” subtype of TNBC.


JAMA Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. e195410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehra Golshan ◽  
Sibylle Loibl ◽  
Stephanie M. Wong ◽  
Jens Bodo Houber ◽  
Joyce O’Shaughnessy ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 586-586
Author(s):  
Liulu Zhang ◽  
Zhiyong Wu ◽  
Ying Lin ◽  
jie li ◽  
Zhenzhen Liu ◽  
...  

586 Background: Taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant regimens have become a standard treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous studies have shown that adding carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens significantly improved pCR rate in TNBC patients. The NeoCART study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus carboplatin with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC. Methods: NeoCART was designed as a multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial. The patients enrolled were at least 18 years old with previously untreated stage II-III (T1cN1-2 or T2-4N0-2) invasive TNBC who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. All eligible patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to the experimental arm (docetaxel (75 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (AUC 6) for six cycles) or the standard treatment arm (epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 four cycles, followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 for four cycles). The primary end point was the pCR rate (ypT0/is and ypN0). Secondary endpoints included event-free survival, frequency of breast-conserving surgery, and safety. Results: Between September 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, 88 patients from 6 participating centers were included and randomized (44 patients to the DCb arm and 44 to the EC-D arm). In the primary end point analysis, 27 patients (61.4%, 95% CI 47.0 - 75.8) in the DCb group achieved a pCR compared with 17 patients (38·6%, 95% CI 24.3 - 53.0) in the EC-D group (odds ratio 2.52, 95% CI 2.4 - 43.1; p = 0.033). In different stage disease, the pCR rates of the DCb and the EC-D groups were 73.3% (22/30) vs 48.4% (15/31) in stage II (p = 0.046), and 35.7% (5/14) vs 15.4% (2/13) in stage III (p = 0.384). In patients with axillary lymph node involvement, the pCR rates were 45.8% (11/24) vs 30.8% (8/26) (p = 0.273); and 80.0% (16/20) vs 50.0% (9/18) with lymph node negative disease (p = 0.052). The frequency of breast-conserving surgery in the DCb and EC-D groups was 36.4% and 37.2%, respectively (p = 0·935). The grade 3/4 adverse events include anemia (4.5%), thrombocytopenia (2.3%), neutropenia (2.3%) and ALT/AST increased (2.3%) in the DCb group. Conclusions: Compared with the standard neoadjuvant regimen, docetaxel combined with carboplatin showed a higher pCR rate in TNBC. The higher pCR rate was more significant in patients with earlier disease stage and negative lymph node. Clinical trial information: NCT03154749 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document