Risks of Laparoscopic Harvest of Free Intestinal Flaps for Esophageal Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Dicle Aksoyler ◽  
Luigi Losco ◽  
Gokhan Sert ◽  
Shih-Heng Chen ◽  
Hung-Chi Chen
1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-337
Author(s):  
Nobuhiko Nishino ◽  
Katsunori Aoki ◽  
Hiroyuki Konno ◽  
Yuji Maruo ◽  
Tatsuo Tanaka ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
Mikhail Ter-ovanesov ◽  
Aleksandr Levitskiy ◽  
E. Lesnidze ◽  
Aram Gaboyan ◽  
Mariya Kukosh ◽  
...  

In the current oncological practice surgical treatment of gastroesophageal cancer with high involvement of the esophagus can extend to total esophago-gastrectomy with colonic interposition as the main method of radical treatment. However the technical complexity and high risk of the intervention are factors in determining the divergent views on the operation itself, testimony for the criteria of patient’s selection, choice of surgical access and the formation of a colonic graft in conjunction with method of esophageal reconstruction. The long-term results of operative intervention depend primarily on the extent of tumor process but obviously higher than after conservative treatment. This article presents a brief critical overview of the main aspects of the simultaneous application of esophago-gastrectomy in surgery of gastroesophageal cancer with high esophageal involvement and our clinical case of successful surgical treatment of a woman with pregnancy-associated gastroesophageal cancer.


2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris D. Tzarnas ◽  
William S. Wittenborn ◽  
Joseph D. Whitlark ◽  
William H. Ayers

2018 ◽  
Vol 226 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Noma ◽  
Yasuhiro Shirakawa ◽  
Nobuhiko Kanaya ◽  
Tsuyoshi Okada ◽  
Naoaki Maeda ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ilitch Diaz-Gutierrez ◽  
Jesse E. Doyle ◽  
Kaustav Majumder ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Madhuri V. Rao ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keizo Sugimachi ◽  
Masahito Ikeda ◽  
Hiroaki Ueo ◽  
Hidenobu Kai ◽  
Yasuyuki Okudaira ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233
Author(s):  
R.M. Neagoe R.M. Neagoe ◽  
Daniela Sala ◽  
D. Zamfir ◽  
S. Bancu ◽  
L. Kiss

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (20) ◽  
pp. 215-223
Author(s):  
Irina Predescu ◽  
Dragos Predescu ◽  
Codrut Sarafoleanu ◽  
Silviu Constantinoiu

Abstract Background. The increased incidence of accidental or non-accidental ingestion of corrosive substances or drug compounds leading to postcaustic esophagitis represents a major public health issue. The treatment of postcaustic esophagitides is difficult and long lasting, calling for a complex team trained in this borderline pathology: gastroenterologist, general surgeon, otorhinolaryngologist, anesthesiologist, psychiatrist. In cases when preventive treatment has failed, the only effective therapy remains the surgical one. Material and methods. Our study involved an analysis of the cases treated and/or operated in the Department of General and Esophageal Surgery of the “Sfanta Maria” Hospital in Bucharest, between 1981-2014; respectively 195 patients who benefited from reconstructive esophageal interventions. Of the selected patients, 191 were operated for corrosive pathology produced by ingestion of caustic soda and only four cases by ingestion of acids. The lesion balance showed that, besides the esophagus, the oropharynx (28 patients), the larynx (7 patients) and the stomach (31 patients) had been affected by the corrosion process, requiring particular surgical solutions. The bypass reconstruction (preserving the esophagus) was the standard treatment, esophagectomy having been performed in only 4 patients. Results. The main remote postoperative complaint was feeding inability, a consequence of various causes: cervical anastomosis stenosis, motor dysfunctions of the graft or of the laryngopharyngeal complex, over-time alteration of the graft, technical vices or the degradation of intra-abdominal assemblies, traumatic injuries of the presternal substituent. Conclusion. One of the most important moments during the esophageal reconstruction surgery remains the duration of the cervical anastomosis, since the postoperative complication rate and the remote functional outcome depend on it. Minimizing postoperative risks and complications requires a complete mastery of surgical methods, of the small technical “artifices” and of the necessary therapeutic refinements adapted to each individual case.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document