Total hip replacement in patients with hip fracture

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 738-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond E. Anakwe ◽  
Scott D. Middleton ◽  
Paul J. Jenkins ◽  
Alison P. Butler ◽  
Stuart A. Aitken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Total Hip

Total hip replacement for hip fracture: Surgical techniques and concepts

Injury ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 2060-2064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Coomber ◽  
Matthew Porteous ◽  
Matthew J.W. Hubble ◽  
Martyn J. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Total Hip

scholarly journals Total hip replacement versus hemiarthroplasty in intracapsular fracture of the elderly

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 2606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Aljizani ◽  
Faris Baawad ◽  
Ahmad Almaghrabi ◽  
Abdulsalam Alshehri ◽  
Atif Alhawash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Operative Revision ◽  
Intracapsular Hip Fracture

Hip fracture is common among elderly and it is considered a major public health problem. Total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty are the procedures of choice for managing intracapsular hip fracture among this population. Each procedure has its advantages and disadvantages. Total hip replacement is generally more preferred because of its safety, efficacy, higher success rates, better early recovery, and lower need for operative revision. On the other hand, it is associated with higher dislocation rates and higher general complications. Hemiarthroplasty is another safe option for management of intracapsular hip fracture. It is associated with higher stability and lower dislocation rates. However, revision may be required postoperatively, and the functional outcomes are slightly lower. This article will review the literature evidence of the advantages and disadvantages of both total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty.

Reduced Revision Risk for Dual-Mobility Cup in Total Hip Replacement Due to Hip Fracture

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (14) ◽  
pp. 1278-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ammar Jobory ◽  
Johan Kärrholm ◽  
Søren Overgaard ◽  
Alma Becic Pedersen ◽  
Geir Hallan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Dual Mobility Cup ◽  
Dual Mobility ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Revision Risk

Hip Fracture Surgery vs Elective Total Hip Replacement

JAMA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 315 (9) ◽  
pp. 941
Author(s):  
Fu S. Xue ◽  
Gao P. Liu ◽  
Rui P. Li
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
Fracture Surgery

Hip Fracture Surgery vs Elective Total Hip Replacement—Reply

JAMA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 315 (9) ◽  
pp. 942
Author(s):  
Yannick Le Manach ◽  
Gary S. Collins ◽  
P. J. Devereaux
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
Fracture Surgery

scholarly journals Adherence to guidelines regarding total hip replacement for fractured neck of femur

2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 422-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Fishlock ◽  
C Scarsbrook ◽  
R Marsh
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
National Average ◽  
Fractured Neck Of Femur ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
American Society

Introduction In 2011 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published guidelines suggesting that clinicians offer total hip replacement (THR) to patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures who could walk independently outside with no aids or one stick, who are not cognitively impaired and are ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade ≤2. They also stated that best practice is operating within 36 hours of presentation. This audit aimed to determine whether Scarborough Hospital was following these guidelines and compared the results with the national average. Methods Two years of data (January 2012 – December 2013) were collected retrospectively from Scarborough Hospital’s hip fracture database on all patients presenting with an intracapsular hip fracture. Data were analysed to determine whether patients who had a THR fulfilled NICE criteria. Furthermore, patients with hemiarthroplasties who were eligible for THRs were identified. Finally, the time to surgery was calculated to examine whether patients receiving THRs waited longer than patients receiving hemiarthroplasties. Results In 2012, 48.6% of all eligible patients received a THR while in 2013 the figure was 55.9%. These percentages are much higher than the national average. However, 36 (53.7%) of the 67 patients who received a THR did not fulfil all the NICE criteria, mainly owing to high ASA grade. The mean time from presentation to theatre for THR was 8 hours and 37 minutes longer for THR patients than for hemiarthroplasty in 2012. This difference was reduced to 2 hours and 12 minutes in 2013. Conclusions Small general hospitals can meet and even exceed the standards regarding treatment strategies for hip factures. However, there is still room for improvement. Departmental training may be useful in achieving this aim. The anaesthetic team should be involved at the earliest opportunity, to help optimise patients preoperatively and determine whether patients listed for THR with higher ASA grades are suitable for this surgery.

scholarly journals Hip Fracture Surgery vs Elective Total Hip Replacement

JAMA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 315 (9) ◽  
pp. 941
Author(s):  
David Metcalfe ◽  
Daniel C. Perry ◽  
Matthew L. Costa
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Total Hip Replacement ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
Fracture Surgery
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document