Human sex differences in emotional processing of own-race and other-race faces

Neuroreport ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 683-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangming Ran ◽  
Xu Chen ◽  
Yangu Pan
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 279-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli J. Finkel ◽  
Erica B. Slotter

AbstractAccording to I3 Theory, individuals enact aggressive behaviors when (a) instigating triggers are severe, (b) impelling forces are strong, and/or (c) inhibiting forces are weak. Archer's analysis of human sex differences in aggression could be bolstered by a careful analysis of male-female discrepancies in reactivity (or exposure) to instigating triggers, proneness toward impelling forces, and/or proneness toward inhibiting forces.


Addiction ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 727-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea R. Vansickel ◽  
William W. Stoops ◽  
Craig R. Rush

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. R190-R191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce F. Benenson ◽  
Henry Markovits ◽  
Richard Wrangham

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 292-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Archer

AbstractMy response is organized into three sections. The first revisits the theme of the target article, the explanatory power of sexual selection versus social role theory. The second considers the range and scope of sexual selection, and its application to human sex differences. Two topics are examined in more detail: (1) the paternity uncertainty theory of partner violence; (2) evolution of inter-group aggression. Section 4 covers ultimate and proximal explanations and their integration within an ethological approach. I consider the development of sex differences in aggression, and their causal mechanisms, within this framework.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document