scholarly journals VI. On the variation with temperature of the rate of a chemical change

In a study of the laws of connexion between the conditions of a chemical change and its amount, whose results have been communicated at intervals to the Royal Society, one of the conditions varied was the temperature of the solution in which the change took place. On considering the numerical results, our first observation was that the increase of rate due to increase of temperature could be nearly represented for equal increments of temperature by a geometric progression. The rate was approximately doubled by each rise of ten degrees in the temperature of the solution. But the ratio of the series gradually diminished as the temperature rose, and a formula had to be found giving a series of this kind. For the way in which such a formula was found, see ‘Phil. Trans.,’ Series A, vol. 186, pp. 855-866.

1806 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
pp. 305-326 ◽  

Dear Sir, Being perfectly convinced of your love of mathematical science, and your extensive acquirements in it, I submit to your perusal a new demonstration of the binomial theorem, when the exponent is a positive or negative fraction. As I am a strenuous advocate for smoothing the way to the acquisition of useful knowledge, i deem the following articles of some importance ; and unless I were equally sincere in this persuasion, and in that of your desire to promote mathemati­cal studies, in requesting the perusal, I should accuse myself of an attempt to trifle with your valuable time. The following demonstration is new only to the extent above mentioned ; but in order that the reader may perceive the proof to be complete, a successive perusal of all the articles is necessary. As far as it relates to the raising of in­tegral powers, it is in substance the same with one which I drew up in the year 1794, and which was honoured with a place in the Philosophical Transactions for 1795. If, therefore, you think the following demonstration worthy the attention of mathematicians, you will much oblige me by presenting it to the Royal Society.


1876 ◽  
Vol 166 ◽  
pp. 725-735 ◽  

In a paper read before the Royal Society, April 1874, I pointed out that the communication of heat from a solid surface to a gas, whether accompanied by evaporation or not, must, according to the kinetic theory, be attended by a reactionary force equi­valent to an increase in the pressure of the gas on the surface, and, conversely, when heat is communicated from the gas to the surface the pressure against the surface is diminished; and I also suggested that these forces are the probable cause of the motion, resulting in some way from radiation, which Mr. Crookes had brought into such pro­minent notice. Since the publication of this paper neither my conclusions as to the existence of these “heat reactions,” nor the reasoning by which I supported them, have been controverted or even questioned; but, on the other hand, they have received important confirmation. The results at which Professors Tait and Dewar arrived after a careful investigation fully bear out my conclusions, not only as to the existence of the forces, but also as to the way in which they explain Mr. Crookes’s experiments.


Having undertaken the magnetic survey of the Indian Archipelago at the recommendation of the Royal Society, I think a slight sketch, detailed as briefly as possible, of my operations may not be uninteresting to Sir John Herschel and the Committee of Physics of which he is Chairman, prior to the publication of the Survey. I trust likewise I have acted strictly in accordance with the wishes of those who so kindly recommended me for the Survey, and I hope that my earnest efforts to do my duty will gain for me that approbation which I have under no ordinary difficulties incessantly striven to obtain. I will in the first place mention the different stations I visited, and then describe in a few words, the way in which the observations were taken.


Nearly thirty years ago we laid before the Royal Society the results of our inquiries into two cases of gradual chemical change, viz.: (1) the reaction of hydrogen permanganate and hydrogen oxalate, and (2) the reaction of hydrogen dioxide and hydrogen iodide. We have continued at intervals our investigation into the latter reaction, and have obtained some further results, which we desire now to communicate to the Royal Society.


1853 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-193
Author(s):  
William John Macquorn Rankine

(33*.) In my paper on the Mechanical Action of Heat, published in the 1st Part of the 20th Volume of the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, some of the numerical results depend upon the dynamical equivalent of a degree of temperature in liquid water. The value of that quantity which I then used, was calculated from the experiments of De la Roche and Bérard on the apparent specific heat of atmospheric air under constant pressure, as compared with liquid water.The experiments of Mr Joule on the production of heat by friction, give, for the specific heat of liquid water, an equivalent about one-ninth part greater than that which is determined from those of De la Roche and Bérard. I was formerly disposed to ascribe this discrepancy in a great measure to the smallness of the differences of temperature measured by Mr Joule, and to unknown causes of loss of power in his apparatus, such as the production of sound and of electricity; but, subsequently to the publication of my paper, I have seen the detailed account of Mr Joule's last experiments in the Philosophical Transactions for 1850, which has convinced me, that the uncertainty arising from the smallness of the elevations of temperature, is removed by the multitude of experiments (being forty on water, fifty on mercury, and twenty on cast iron); that the agreement amongst the results from substances so different, shews that the error by unknown losses of power is insensible, or nearly so; and that the necessary conclusion is, that the dynamical value assigned by Mr Joule to the specific heat of liquid water, viz.:—772 feet per degree of Fahrenheit, does not err by more than two or at the utmost, three feet; and therefore, that the discrepancy originates chiefly in the experiments of De la Roche and Bérard.


When in December 1970 I organized a Discussion Meeting at the Royal Society concerned with the active transport of salts and water in living tissues, the focus of our deliberations was principally on the transport of the dominant biological cations: sodium in vertebrates, and potassium in insects. The anions chloride and bicarbonate were not totally neglected, and Jean Maetz, whose tragic death in a car accident a few years ago so saddened us all, gave us a masterly review (Maetz 1971) of their role in the transfer of salts in fish gills. But on looking through the published proceedings, one gets the impression that all the time it was sodium that was in the limelight with the thick black arrows, while chloride was relegated to the indignity of being passively transported, and was shuffled off with dashed lines in an obscure corner of the diagram. One of the reasons for this emphasis was, of course, the accident of the way in which the subject had happened to develop historically.


THE following letter has been received from the Secretaries of the Society for publication in the hope that it may provoke discussion on a matter of some importance to the well-being of the Society. To the Secretaries of the Royal Society. Dear Sirs, In recent years a good deal of dissatisfaction has been expressed in the Society with the way in which papers have been ‘ read ’ before it. I do not think that those who read the papers have been entirely to blame, since, as far as I know, it has never been properly considered what the purpose of the reading is. It is easy to say that when someone has made an important discovery he is to tell the Society about it, but in fact hardly one paper in a hundred of those communicated is of this class. In the remaining ninety^nine cases the paper will consist of a small advance in some field of study, often very specialized study, of which the great majority of the audience is largely ignorant, and this evidently calls for different treatment. In giving his account, the speaker is usually embarrassed by the fact that among his audience there are a few experts in his subject, while the remainder have only a rather vague knowledge of it, and he (especially if he is a young man) tends to address the experts. Moreover, he is apt to assume that he may refer to any previous work in his subject as being familiar to the whole audience. The result is that he is incomprehensible to the great majority, and on the other hand the experts can hardly be expected to pronounce critical opinions on a paper which they have not seen in detail. No useful purpose on either side is achieved by this manner of reading papers.


Since the publication in 1950 of E. S. de Beer’s valuable article on ‘The Earliest Fellows of the Royal Society’ (1), there have come to light some early account books of the Society (2). The earliest one is particularly useful because of the way in which it presents information on the membership of the Society before the granting of the first and second charters of incorporation. The first collected statement of accounts is that of the treasurer, William Balle,* and relates, in respect of receipts, to the period of 134 weeks from 28 November 1660 to 24 June 1663, this being the date up to which the Council of the Royal Society ‘ordered, that all persons, that have been elected or admitted into the Royal Society, do pay their whole arrears . . . ’(3). The statement is presented in columns, which give the following information: 1. Number of entry. 2. Name of member. 3. Number of weekly subscriptions due. 4. Date on which subscriptions first became due. 5. Admission money. 6. Amount paid by member. 7. Arrears owing by member. With two exceptions’)* only the names are listed in the order in which the members were accepted or admitted into the Society; in subsequent years the names are given roughly alphabetically. The information in the third and fourth columns provides the date on which any individual was, in so far as subscriptions were concerned, considered to be a member, but in some cases does not agree with the date given either in the Journal Book of the Royal Society or the Minutes of Council.


1865 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 358-371 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
New Work ◽  

The present memoir presented to the Royal Society is preliminary; it does not profess to do more than to open the way to new work, and to show the reasons why the restoration of action, in cases where life is suspended, is at present so doubtful and difficult.


1935 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 145-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson

Fifty years ago, when this Royal Society was a hundred years old, it fell to Lord Moncrieff, the President, to speak to the occasion. He sketched the history of the Society through its hundred years, and dwelt most on the days when it was born. He told how the Founders made their way one winter's night from homes in Lawnmarket or Canongate to the College Library (as Johnson and Boswell had lately done), with a few flickering oil-lamps to light the way and tallow-candles which dimly lit the room.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document