scholarly journals The Prognostic Importance of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Monitoring Patients Undergoing Maximum Androgen Blockage for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 118-124
Author(s):  
Ahmet Kiper ◽  
Orhan Yiğitbasi ◽  
Abdurrahim Imamoglu ◽  
Can Tuygun ◽  
Celaleddin Turan

The changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations can be used as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing maximum androgen blockage for metastatic prostate cancer. A total of 149 patients followed in our department were classified into 4 groups on the basis of PSA changes: group 1, those with normalisation of PSA levels within the first 3 months; group 2, those with normalisation of PSA between months 3 and 6; group 3, those with a decrease in PSA, but not reaching normal range; group 4, those with no decrease. The gleason scores and the number of bone metastases were also compared between the groups. Again time to progression in patients with Gleason scores 5-7 (grade 2) and over 7 (grade 3) whose PSA levels decreased between first and 3rd months (mean 21.2 months) were significantly longer than the patients with same gleason scores whose PSA levels decreased between 3rd and 6th months (mean 13.4 months) (p < 0.001). The decrease in PSA level is more important than gleason scores in determining the time to progression. Early normalisation of PSA delays the time to progression and when combined with gleason scores, PSA is an important prognostic factor in predicting the success of the therapy.

2005 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-330
Author(s):  
A. Kiper ◽  
O. Yigitbasi ◽  
A. Imamoglu ◽  
C. Tuygun ◽  
C. Turan

The changes in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations can be used as a prognostic factor in patients undergoing maximum androgen blockade for metastatic prostate cancer. Materials and methods One hundred and forty-nine patients followed-up in our department were classified into four groups based on PSA changes. Group 1, those with a normalization of PSA levels within the 1st 3 months; group 2, those with a normalization of PSA levels between months 3 and 6; group 3, those with a reduction in PSA levels, but not reaching the normal range; group 4, those with no reduction in PSA levels. The gleason scores and the number of bone metastases were also compared between the groups. Results The time to progression was significantly delayed in group 1 (mean: 23.3 months) compared to that of group 2 (mean: 16.9 months) (p<0.02). The time to progression in group 3 (mean: 8.45 months) was significantly shorter compared to groups 1 and 2 (p<0.001). In addition, in patients with gleason scores 5–7 (grade 2) and gleason scores >7 (grade 3) and in group 1, the time to progression (mean: 21.2 months) was significantly delayed compared to those with the same gleason scores but in group 2 (mean: 13.4 months) (p<0.001). Conclusion The reduction in PSA levels is more important than gleason scores in determining the time to progression. Early normalization of PSA levels delays the time to progression, and when combined with gleason scores, PSA is an important prognostic factor in predicting the success of the therapy.


2006 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 060123080936010
Author(s):  
David M. Lubaroff ◽  
Badrinath Konety ◽  
Brian K. Link ◽  
Timothy L. Link ◽  
Tammy Madsen ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzo Furuya ◽  
Susumu Akimoto ◽  
Koichiro Akakura ◽  
Tatsuo Igarashi ◽  
Shino Murakami ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document