scholarly journals Fitting phenological curves with Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin Edwards ◽  
Elizabeth E. Crone

AbstractUnderstanding organismal phenology has been an emerging interest in ecology, in part because phenological shifts are one of the most conspicuous signs of climate change. While we are seeing increased collection of phenological data and creative use of historical data sets, existing statistical tools to measure phenology are generally either limited (e.g., first day of observation, which has problematic biases) or are challenging to implement (often requiring custom coding, or enough data to fit many parameters). We present a method to fit phenological data with Gaussian curves using linear models, and show how robust phenological metrics can be obtained using standard linear regression tools. We then apply this method to eight years of Baltimore checkerspot data using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). This case study illustrates the ability of years with extensive data to inform years with less data and shows that butterfly flight activity is somewhat earlier in warmer years. We believe our new method fills a convenient midpoint between ad hoc measures and custom-coded models.

Author(s):  
Intesar N. El-Saeiti ◽  
Khalil Mostafa ALsawi

This article is concerned with hierarchical generalized linear models. It includes generalized linear models and generalized linear mixed models, which are related to linear models. In generalized linear mixed models, the dependent variable and the standard error follow any distribution from the exponential family, e.g. normal, Poisson, binomial, gamma, etc. We studied counting data, and then use the Poisson-gamma model,where the dependentvariable follows the Poisson distribution and the standard error follow the gamma distribution. Several estimation techniques can be used for generalized linear mixed model. In this paperthe hierarchical likelihood estimation technique was used to prove the performance of H-likelihood methodwhen thecounting data were balanced or unbalanced. Real data were used to test the performance of Poisson-gamma H-likelihood estimation method in case of balanced and unbalanced counting data.When real data used in the past research for another problem, it was noticed that the performance of the hierarchical likelihood estimation technique gave a close approximations in the event of balanced and unbalanced counting data, and the output of the technique was approximately equivalent in both instances.


2021 ◽  
pp. 096228022110175
Author(s):  
Jan P Burgard ◽  
Joscha Krause ◽  
Ralf Münnich ◽  
Domingo Morales

Obesity is considered to be one of the primary health risks in modern industrialized societies. Estimating the evolution of its prevalence over time is an essential element of public health reporting. This requires the application of suitable statistical methods on epidemiologic data with substantial local detail. Generalized linear-mixed models with medical treatment records as covariates mark a powerful combination for this purpose. However, the task is methodologically challenging. Disease frequencies are subject to both regional and temporal heterogeneity. Medical treatment records often show strong internal correlation due to diagnosis-related grouping. This frequently causes excessive variance in model parameter estimation due to rank-deficiency problems. Further, generalized linear-mixed models are often estimated via approximate inference methods as their likelihood functions do not have closed forms. These problems combined lead to unacceptable uncertainty in prevalence estimates over time. We propose an l2-penalized temporal logit-mixed model to solve these issues. We derive empirical best predictors and present a parametric bootstrap to estimate their mean-squared errors. A novel penalized maximum approximate likelihood algorithm for model parameter estimation is stated. With this new methodology, the regional obesity prevalence in Germany from 2009 to 2012 is estimated. We find that the national prevalence ranges between 15 and 16%, with significant regional clustering in eastern Germany.


Biometrics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1043-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Yasui ◽  
Ziding Feng ◽  
Paula Diehr ◽  
Dale McLerran ◽  
Shirley A. A. Beresford ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document