scholarly journals Development and validation of a length- and habitus-based method of ideal and lean body weight estimation for critically ill adults requiring urgent weight-based medical intervention

Author(s):  
Mike Wells ◽  
Lara Nicole Goldstein ◽  
Giles N Cattermole

Objective: Accurate drug dosing in obese patients requires an estimation of ideal body weight (IBW) or lean body weight (LBW) for dosing hydrophilic medications. Erroneous weight estimates during the management of critically ill adults may contribute to poor outcomes. Existing methods of IBW and LBW estimation or measurement are very difficult to use during emergency care. A new point-of-care model is needed to provide rapid estimates of IBW and LBW for this purpose. Methods A model was derived based on the PAWPER XL-MAC tape, a pediatric weight estimation system, which uses recumbent length and mid-arm circumference to estimate IBW and LBW. The model was used to generate weight estimations in a derivation sample (n=33155) and a validation sample (n=5926) from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) datasets. The outcome measure was to achieve >95% of IBW and LBW estimations within 20% of recognized reference standards (P20>95%) and >70% of estimations within 10% of these standards (P10>70%). Main Results: The new model achieved a P20 of 100% and a P10 of 99.9% for IBW and a P20 of 98.3% and a P10 of 78.3% for LBW. This accuracy was maintained in both sexes, all ages, all ethnic groups, all lengths and in all habitus-types, except for the morbidly obese female subgroup. Conclusions The modified PAWPER XL-MAC model proved to be an accurate method of IBW and LBW estimation. It could, therefore, have an important role in facilitating emergency drug dose calculations in acutely or critically ill obese adult patients. Conclusions The modified PAWPER XL-MAC model proved to be an accurate method of IBW and LBW estimation. It could, therefore, have an important role in facilitating emergency drug dose calculations in acutely or critically ill obese adult patients.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Wells ◽  
Lara Nicole Goldstein ◽  
Giles N Cattermole

Background Erroneous weight estimation during the management of emergency presentations in adults may contribute to patient harm and poor outcomes. Patients can often not be weighed during emergencies and a weight estimation is required to facilitate weight-based therapies. Many existing methods of weight estimation are either unacceptably inaccurate or very difficult to use during the provision of emergency care. Methods The weight estimation system developed in this study was based on and modified from the PAWPER XL-MAC method, a paediatric weight estimation system that uses recumbent length and mid-arm circumference (MAC) to predict total body weight. This model was validated in the 2015 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) datasets. The primary outcome measure was to achieve >95% of estimations within 20% of measured weight (P20>95%). Results The modified PAWPER XL-MAC model achieved a P20 of 96.0% and a P10 of 71.3% in the validation dataset (N=11520). This accuracy (P20>95%) was maintained in both sexes, all ages, all ethnic groups, all lengths and in all habitus-types, except for the subgroup of severely obese individuals. Conclusions The modified PAWPER XL-MAC model proved to be a very accurate method of weight estimation. It is more accurate than most other published reports of existing methods of weight estimation, except for patients' own estimations. It therefore could have a role in facilitating emergency drug dose calculations, if prospective studies bear out the accuracy found in this study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document